Belgian Pro LeagueJan Breydel Stadion, Brugge18°13 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Cercle BruggeCercle BruggePossession & high press
    vs
    GentGentBalanced & physical
    The model's lean: 2 · Gent (37%)Soft drawBest value by the model: X · Draw @ 3.61 (+11 %)

    Cercle BruggeGent · Belgian Pro League

    1 · Cercle Brugge 33%X 31%37% Gent · 2

    Analysis: Cercle BruggeGent

    Marcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work

    TEXT: Gent's recent form and their compact defensive setup present a formidable challenge as they travel to face Cercle Brugge. With three consecutive wins under their belt, the visitors are riding high on momentum. Yet, it's the hosts who have historically dominated this fixture, notching up four victories in their last six encounters against Gent. This head-to-head record, though notable, is a small sample and is likely overshadowed by current form and expected goals.

    Cercle Brugge’s high-pressing, possession-based style could unsettle Gent's balanced approach. However, the effectiveness of their press may be tested against Gent's physicality and discipline at the back. The hosts have been impressive with an xG of 1.8 per match, highlighting their ability to create chances. However, they also concede plenty, with an xGA of 1.8, suggesting vulnerabilities which Gent could exploit, particularly with their superior defensive xGA of 0.51.

    Expect a tightly contested affair with goals likely at both ends. The model suggests a 59% likelihood of over 2.5 goals and a 61% chance of both teams scoring. These probabilities are underpinned by Cercle Brugge's attacking prowess and Gent's recent scoring form. The model slightly leans towards Gent, bolstered by their current three-game winning streak and slightly better xPoints, which hint at an underlying edge despite their lesser historical success in this fixture.

    Given the balance of attacking and defensive metrics, a 1-2 scoreline in favor of Gent seems plausible. The data-driven probabilities, coupled with Gent's recent performances, make them a compelling choice for those seeking value.

    Cercle BruggeCercle Brugge
    Form LDDLL
    League ranking xG #6xGA #12xT #11xP/match #8Points #13
    Key players
    • Steve NgouraFxG 0.66 · xT 0.19
    • Viggo MartensFxG 0.12 · xT 0.15
    • Gary Jean MagnéeRWxG 0.12 · xT 0.23
    GentGent
    Form LDWWW
    League ranking xG #13xGA #1xT #10xP/match #1Points #3
    Key players
    • Momodou Lamin SonkoLWxG 0.15 · xT 0.11
    • Josué Yamir Vergara OrtegaFxG 0.95 · xT -0.01
    • Tibe De VliegerCMxG 0.03 · xT 0.06

    Match prediction: Cercle BruggeGent

    Predicted score matrix

    Gent
    Cercle Brugge
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–05.0%
    0–17.2%
    0–25.9%
    0–33.1%
    0–4+1.8%
    1
    1–06.6%
    1–111.3%
    1–28.7%
    1–34.6%
    1–4+2.6%
    2
    2–05.1%
    2–18.1%
    2–26.4%
    2–33.4%
    2–4+1.9%
    3
    3–02.5%
    3–13.9%
    3–23.1%
    3–31.7%
    3–4+0.9%
    4+
    4+–01.3%
    4+–12.0%
    4+–21.6%
    4+–30.8%
    4+–4+0.5%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-111%
    2. 2.1-29%
    3. 3.2-18%
    4. 4.0-17%
    5. 5.1-07%
    Expected goals
    1,471,59
    Both teams to score
    61%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 3,1
    Under 2,541%
    @2.16
    Over 2,559%
    @1.70

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Gent or draw (X2)65%
    • Over 1.5 goals81%

    Combined probability

    53%

    Fair odds

    1.89

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Gent or draw (X2)65%
    • Over 2.5 goals59%
    • Aka Wilfried Julien Kanga to score23%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score61%
    • Over 2.5 goals59%
    • Steve Ngoura to score25%
    • Leonardo Adelino da Silva Lopes to be booked20%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • X · Draw31% probability@3.61PinnacleEV+11%reference odds
    • X · Draw31% probability@3.55Betfair ExchangeEV+9%reference odds
    • X · Draw31% probability@3.45BetsafeEV+6%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Cercle BruggeX2 · Gent
    Betfair Exchange1.44
    EV+ 9%
    3.55
    1.43
    Betsafe2.82
    EV+ 6%
    3.45
    2.35
    Betsson2.82
    EV+ 6%
    3.45
    2.35
    Nordicbet2.82
    EV+ 6%
    3.45
    2.35
    Pinnacle2.85
    EV+ 11%
    3.61
    2.35

    Odds updated 4 Sept, 11:38

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    6 matches
    Cercle Brugge 4Draw 1Gent 1
    Goals: 107 (⌀ 2,8)

    Head-to-head based on Belgian Pro League data since 2023.

    Key facts

    • Cercle Brugge KSV dominate this fixture historically: 4 wins to 1 in 6 meetings.
    • KAA Gent come into this round on 3 straight wins.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Cercle Brugge
    Gent
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Cercle Brugge (57)
    Gent (62)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Cercle Brugge
    Geoffrey Kondo: 223 passningar, xT 0.8KondoEmmanuel Kakou: 137 passningar, xT 0.05KakouChristiaan Ravych: 120 passningar, xT 0.04RavychValy Konaté: 118 passningar, xT 0.29KonatéGary Jean Magnée: 104 passningar, xT 0.8MagnéeMakaya Ibrahima Diaby: 96 passningar, xT 0.1DiabyIbrahim Diakite: 79 passningar, xT 0.1DiakiteLukas Hubert Mondele Anzun: 70 passningar, xT 0.24AnzunDante Vanzeir: 65 passningar, xT 0.23VanzeirGaëtan Coucke: 61 passningar, xT 0.18CouckeViggo Martens: 52 passningar, xT 0.49Martens
    Gent
    Siebe Van der Heyden: 214 passningar, xT 0.51HeydenChristian Burgess: 170 passningar, xT 0.17BurgessTiago Araujo: 143 passningar, xT 0.8AraujoMouhamed El Bachir Ngom: 138 passningar, xT 0.49NgomDavy Roef: 102 passningar, xT 0.04RoefLeonardo Lopes: 100 passningar, xT 0.01LopesMathias Delorge: 66 passningar, xT 0.03DelorgeAime Omgba: 62 passningar, xT -0.04OmgbaAbdelkahar Kadri: 60 passningar, xT 0.01KadriMomodou Lamin Sonko: 59 passningar, xT 0.26SonkoTibe De Vlieger: 58 passningar, xT 0.02Vlieger
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Cercle Brugge
    Geoffrey Kondo: 223 passningar, xT 0.8KondoEmmanuel Kakou: 137 passningar, xT 0.05KakouChristiaan Ravych: 120 passningar, xT 0.04RavychValy Konaté: 118 passningar, xT 0.29KonatéGary Jean Magnée: 104 passningar, xT 0.8MagnéeMakaya Ibrahima Diaby: 96 passningar, xT 0.1DiabyIbrahim Diakite: 79 passningar, xT 0.1DiakiteLukas Hubert Mondele Anzun: 70 passningar, xT 0.24AnzunDante Vanzeir: 65 passningar, xT 0.23VanzeirGaëtan Coucke: 61 passningar, xT 0.18CouckeViggo Martens: 52 passningar, xT 0.49Martens
    Gent
    Siebe Van der Heyden: 214 passningar, xT 0.51HeydenChristian Burgess: 170 passningar, xT 0.17BurgessTiago Araujo: 143 passningar, xT 0.8AraujoMouhamed El Bachir Ngom: 138 passningar, xT 0.49NgomDavy Roef: 102 passningar, xT 0.04RoefLeonardo Lopes: 100 passningar, xT 0.01LopesMathias Delorge: 66 passningar, xT 0.03DelorgeAime Omgba: 62 passningar, xT -0.04OmgbaAbdelkahar Kadri: 60 passningar, xT 0.01KadriMomodou Lamin Sonko: 59 passningar, xT 0.26SonkoTibe De Vlieger: 58 passningar, xT 0.02Vlieger

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceCercle BruggeGent
    Points29
    xPoints5.96.2
    xG per match1.81.3
    xGA per match1.80.51
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.340.26
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.340.1
    Playing styleCercle BruggeGent
    Build-up efficiency0.310.3
    Field tilt0.420.43
    xT per match11.1
    xTA per match1.30.73
    Won balls, offensive half2729
    Pressing intensity0.220.2
    Pressing efficiency0.270.22
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.210.18
    Entries into the box per match139
    Entries into the box against149
    Pass completion %0.730.82
    Pass completion % under pressure0.710.76
    Passes per match306438
    Passes against per match440470
    Switches of play per match17.248.2
    Long balls per match2650
    Set piecesCercle BruggeGent
    xG from free kicks0.050.01
    Corners per match8.52.3
    Corners against per match5.74
    xG per corner0.060.01
    xGA per corner against0.030.02
    First touch, offensive corners %0.380.43
    First touch, defensive corners %0.350.75
    OtherCercle BruggeGent
    Throw-in control0.650.66
    The goalkeepersGaëtan Coucke (Cercle Brugge)Davy Roef (Gent)
    Saves108
    Save %59%80%
    xG prevented32%59%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Cercle Brugge vs Gent according to our model?

    The model gives Gent a 37% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Cercle Brugge 33%, draw 31%, Gent 37%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 59% and under at 41%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 61% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.