01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Club Brugge to win61%
- Over 1.5 goals86%
Belgian Pro LeaguePlanet Group Arena, Gent19°3,2 mm31 km/h
Läs på svenskaMarcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
Club Brugge's 61% model probability to win this match against Gent underscores their dominance, both historically and in current form. With a high-scoring average of 3.5 goals per meeting, this fixture typically delivers entertainment. Brugge's relentless scoring, netting in 20 consecutive league matches, coupled with their possession-based and high-press style, suggests they will control the tempo and enforce their strategy on a balanced and physical Gent side.
The head-to-head record, while indicating a Brugge advantage with six wins from ten encounters, holds less weight than the stark season performance differences. Brugge's four-game winning streak and xG advantage of 3.4 per match highlight their attacking prowess. Gent’s defensive resilience (xGA of 0.42) will be tested against Brugge’s attacking machine. Despite the hosts’ solidity at the back, their inferior xPoints of 3.9 against Brugge’s 6.2 points to an uphill battle.
A likely scoreline is 1-2 in favor of Club Brugge, with the over 2.5 goals at 67% an appealing play. For those hunting value, the over 4.5 goals at odds of 4.45 with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet, given a model rating of 26%, presents a significant 16% edge.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Gent | X | 2 · Club Brugge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 4.35 | 3.80 | EV+ 7% 1.75 |
| Betsson | 4.35 | 3.80 | EV+ 7% 1.75 |
| Nordicbet | 4.35 | 3.80 | EV+ 7% 1.75 |
| Pinnacle | 4.15 | 4.17 | EV+ 5% 1.73 |
Odds updated 28 Aug, 11:39
4.05 → 4.15
4.07 → 4.17
1.77 → 1.73
Pinnacle · 4 recorded price levels · 24/08/2026 → 26/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Belgian Pro League data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Gent | Club Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 6 | 9 |
| xPoints | 3.9 | 6.2 |
| xG per match | 1.1 | 3.4 |
| xGA per match | 0.42 | 0.79 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.39 | 0.38 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.12 | 0.19 |
| Playing style | Gent | Club Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.3 | 0.34 |
| Field tilt | 0.46 | 0.78 |
| xT per match | 0.65 | 2 |
| xTA per match | 0.57 | 0.51 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 33 | 28 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.2 | 0.22 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.25 | 0.35 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.22 | 0.33 |
| Entries into the box per match | 8 | 23 |
| Entries into the box against | 7 | 7 |
| Pass completion % | 0.81 | 0.85 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.77 | 0.79 |
| Passes per match | 478 | 648 |
| Passes against per match | 394 | 210 |
| Switches of play per match | 51.2 | 34.7 |
| Long balls per match | 49 | 35 |
| Set pieces | Gent | Club Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0 | 0 |
| Corners per match | 3 | 10.4 |
| Corners against per match | 3.5 | 3 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0.07 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.33 | 0.55 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 1 | 0.67 |
| Other | Gent | Club Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.65 | 0.73 |
| The goalkeepers | Davy Roef (Gent) | Yann Sommer (Club Brugge) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 6 | 7 |
| Save % | 86% | 100% |
| xG prevented | 73% | 100% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Club Brugge a 61% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Gent 18%, draw 21%, Club Brugge 61%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-2 at 10% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 67% and under at 33%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 63% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.