01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Gent to win49%
- Over 1.5 goals76%
Belgian Pro LeaguePlanet Group Arena, Gent15°0,3 mm22 km/h
Läs på svenskaErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
TEXT:
Gent's dominance in the head-to-head encounters since 2023 is unmistakable, having claimed victory in all four of their recent matchups against Standard Liège. While the sample size is small, it nonetheless aligns with their current form. Gent enters this contest riding a wave of five consecutive wins, an indication of their solid performance this season. Their robust defensive setup, allowing just 0.59 expected goals against per match, further underscores their strength at the back.
Standard, on the other hand, have been rallying with three straight wins, finding success through a possession-based approach. However, their defensive frailty, conceding an expected 1.6 goals per match, could be their undoing against Gent's balanced and physical style. Despite Standard's ability to generate more expected goals per match at 1.8, their vulnerability in defense presents a stark contrast to Gent's solidity.
The model probabilities offer Gent a substantial edge, with a 49% chance of securing the win compared to Standard's 21%. A tight contest is anticipated, reflected in the most likely scorelines of 1-1 and 1-0, each suggesting a close match with possibly only a single goal margin.
With a slight edge towards over 2.5 goals at 51%, the expectation leans toward a moderately high-scoring affair, though both teams finding the net remains close to a coin flip at 53%. This points towards a game that might see goals at both ends rather than a tightly shut-out contest.
For bettors searching for value, Gent's model win probability of 49% against the field stands out as a point of interest, offering a potential angle based on current form and historical dominance.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Head-to-head based on Belgian Pro League data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Gent | Standard Liège |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 15 | 11 |
| xPoints | 10.3 | 7.4 |
| xG per match | 1.3 | 1.8 |
| xGA per match | 0.59 | 1.6 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.2 | 0.34 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.1 | 0.51 |
| Playing style | Gent | Standard Liège |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Field tilt | 0.44 | 0.53 |
| xT per match | 0.9 | 1.1 |
| xTA per match | 0.84 | 1.2 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 26 | 28 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.21 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.25 | 0.33 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.19 | 0.32 |
| Entries into the box per match | 10 | 15 |
| Entries into the box against | 9 | 16 |
| Pass completion % | 0.8 | 0.72 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.73 | 0.68 |
| Passes per match | 413 | 356 |
| Passes against per match | 452 | 329 |
| Switches of play per match | 45.2 | 23.3 |
| Long balls per match | 50 | 35 |
| Set pieces | Gent | Standard Liège |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.01 | 0.06 |
| Corners per match | 3.4 | 6 |
| Corners against per match | 4.2 | 5.4 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.29 | 0.43 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.81 | 0.48 |
| Other | Gent | Standard Liège |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.65 | 0.65 |
| The goalkeepers | Davy Roef (Gent) | Matthieu Epolo (Standard Liège) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 10 | 11 |
| Save % | 83% | 65% |
| xG prevented | 65% | 37% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Gent a 49% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Gent 49%, draw 29%, Standard Liège 21%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 51% and under at 49%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 53% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.