01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance OH Leuven or draw (1X)71%
- Over 1.5 goals78%
Belgian Pro LeagueDen Dreef, Leuven14°13,5 mm24 km/h
Läs på svenska
OH LeuvenLow block & direct
La LouvièreLow block & directSofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
Two head-to-head encounters since 2023, with a draw and a win for La Louvière, might suggest a tilt toward the visitors. Yet, with a sample this small, it holds little sway compared to the present form and expected goals. Leuven's recent six-match losing streak paints a stark contrast to La Louvière's modest but tangible edge in points and xPoints amassed this season. These figures hint at a tighter contest rather than a clear victor, with Leuven grappling for stability.
Leuven's scoring potential, pegged at 1.59 xG, speaks to sporadic offensive promise. In contrast, La Louvière's 1.22 xG suggests they might lean more on defensive lapses from their opponents. Both sides share a low-defense, direct playing style, indicating a possible back-and-forth rather than a strategic stalemate. With both teams expected to score in 57% of scenarios, goals could come from either end, adding layers to this matchup.
The model leans toward Leuven with a 43% chance of victory, yet the most likely scoreline of 1-1 at 12% underscores the draw's 30% probability. An over 2.5 goals probability of 53% signals goals are on the cards, though not overwhelmingly so. This aligns with the likelihood of a 2-1 outcome more than a goal drought, although neither team is secure at the back.
There's a glint of value for those eyeing La Louvière as the underdogs. With a 27% win probability, odds longer than 3.70 on La Louvière capture potential mispricing. Their edge in points and xPoints over a Leuven side struggling with form could turn the odds in their favor.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Head-to-head based on Belgian Pro League data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | OH Leuven | La Louvière |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 0 | 1 |
| xPoints | 3 | 5.9 |
| xG per match | 1.2 | 0.97 |
| xGA per match | 2.7 | 2.1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.39 | 0.34 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.27 | 0.66 |
| Playing style | OH Leuven | La Louvière |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.31 | 0.33 |
| Field tilt | 0.49 | 0.25 |
| xT per match | 1.4 | 0.7 |
| xTA per match | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 33 | 28 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.25 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.31 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.25 | 0.21 |
| Entries into the box per match | 15 | 9 |
| Entries into the box against | 17 | 21 |
| Pass completion % | 0.77 | 0.67 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.73 | 0.6 |
| Passes per match | 387 | 239 |
| Passes against per match | 371 | 546 |
| Switches of play per match | 33 | 15.8 |
| Long balls per match | 42 | 27 |
| Set pieces | OH Leuven | La Louvière |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.01 | 0.05 |
| Corners per match | 3.6 | 2.8 |
| Corners against per match | 8.5 | 7 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.05 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.72 | 0.14 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.6 | 0.51 |
| Other | OH Leuven | La Louvière |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.74 | 0.67 |
| The goalkeepers | Dani Van Den Heuvel (OH Leuven) | Marcos Peano (La Louvière) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 17 | 17 |
| Save % | 59% | 59% |
| xG prevented | 40% | 36% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives OH Leuven a 43% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: OH Leuven 43%, draw 30%, La Louvière 27%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 53% and under at 47%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 57% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.