01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Royal Charleroi or draw (X2)65%
- Over 1.5 goals77%
Belgian Pro LeagueRegenboogstadion, Waregem18°3,1 mm16 km/h
Läs på svenskaAnna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
The unbeaten streak of Zulte Waregem is the standout number. Twelve matches without a loss is a formidable record, yet the underlying numbers point to a different reality. Charleroi not only edges their hosts in points and expected points but also boasts superior xG and xGA metrics. Despite Waregem's streak and head-to-head results, the model's lean towards Charleroi seems justified.
The expected goals suggest a close contest, with Zulte Waregem at 1.36 and Charleroi slightly ahead at 1.45. Such figures align with the most likely scorelines of 1-1 and 1-2. With both sides utilizing a possession control style, and the rain likely to suppress goal-scoring, we might witness a tactical battle rather than a high-scoring affair. However, the model still favors over 2.5 goals at 53%, indicating potential for action despite the weather.
Charleroi's chances appear undervalued in the markets, with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet offering odds of 2.6, representing a 1% edge on the model's 39% assessment. This slim advantage might appeal to value-seekers eyeing the visitors to break Waregem's streak. A narrow 1-2 victory for Charleroi is the call, aligning with both the model's probabilities and expected goals.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Zulte Waregem | X | 2 · Royal Charleroi |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.55 | 3.45 | EV+ 1% 2.60 |
| Betsson | 2.55 | 3.45 | EV+ 1% 2.60 |
| Nordicbet | 2.55 | 3.45 | EV+ 1% 2.60 |
| Pinnacle | 2.58 | 3.44 | EV+ 4% 2.67 |
Odds updated 11 Sept, 16:39
2.73 → 2.58
3.48 → 3.44
2.50 → 2.67
1.71 → 1.78
Pinnacle · 6 recorded price levels · 07/09/2026 → 10/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Belgian Pro League data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Zulte Waregem | Royal Charleroi |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 11 | 12 |
| xPoints | 8.1 | 9.1 |
| xG per match | 1.3 | 2 |
| xGA per match | 1 | 0.86 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.32 | 0.15 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.06 | 0.28 |
| Playing style | Zulte Waregem | Royal Charleroi |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.34 | 0.33 |
| Field tilt | 0.43 | 0.57 |
| xT per match | 0.9 | 1.6 |
| xTA per match | 1.1 | 0.79 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 30 | 33 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.23 | 0.34 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.16 | 0.31 |
| Entries into the box per match | 13 | 16 |
| Entries into the box against | 11 | 11 |
| Pass completion % | 0.71 | 0.77 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.63 | 0.72 |
| Passes per match | 279 | 423 |
| Passes against per match | 449 | 308 |
| Switches of play per match | 18.9 | 34.5 |
| Long balls per match | 27 | 41 |
| Set pieces | Zulte Waregem | Royal Charleroi |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Corners per match | 4.7 | 6.2 |
| Corners against per match | 5.3 | 3.6 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.46 | 0.32 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.59 | 0.56 |
| Other | Zulte Waregem | Royal Charleroi |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.69 | 0.67 |
| The goalkeepers | Louis Bostyn (Zulte Waregem) | Mohamed Koné (Royal Charleroi) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 16 | 11 |
| Save % | 84% | 73% |
| xG prevented | 63% | 68% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Royal Charleroi a 39% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Zulte Waregem 34%, draw 28%, Royal Charleroi 39%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 53% and under at 47%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 57% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.