01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Osijek to win52%
- Under 3.5 goals73%
Croatian HNL27°11 km/h
Läs på svenska
Slaven BelupoLow block & directErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
Osijek's 52% win probability sets the stage, backed by their stronger xG and xPoints compared to Slaven Belupo. The hosts control possession, aiming to dominate, while the visitors rely on a low defensive block and direct play. Despite an even head-to-head since 2023, the form numbers favor Osijek significantly. Expected goals also lean towards the home side, projecting 1.60 against Slaven's 1.01.
The most likely outcomes are 1-1 and 1-0, both pointing to a match with limited goal action. The over/under on 2.5 goals is tightly balanced, with a slight tilt towards fewer goals. Both teams to score is essentially a coin toss at 51%. Given these factors, a cautious 1-0 victory for Osijek feels aligned with the patterns.
For those seeking value, the under 1.5 goals line stands out. With odds of 4.25 offered by Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet, the model's 26% probability signals an 11% edge. While not a guarantee, it's the sharpest angle on a game likely defined by tactical caution and defensive discipline.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Osijek | X | 2 · Slaven Belupo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.65 | EV+ 0% 3.70 | 4.50 |
| Betsson | 1.65 | EV+ 0% 3.70 | 4.50 |
| Nordicbet | 1.65 | EV+ 0% 3.70 | 4.50 |
| Pinnacle | 1.64 | EV+ 5% 3.87 | EV+ 8% 5.10 |
Odds updated 30 Aug, 05:13
1.60 → 1.64
3.84 → 3.87
5.18 → 5.10
1.62 → 1.63
Pinnacle · 5 recorded price levels · 24/08/2026 → 30/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Croatian HNL data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Osijek | Slaven Belupo |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 9 | 3 |
| xPoints | 7 | 3.2 |
| xG per match | 2.1 | 0.71 |
| xGA per match | 1.1 | 2.3 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.43 | 0.06 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.17 | 0.23 |
| Playing style | Osijek | Slaven Belupo |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.29 | 0.29 |
| Field tilt | 0.56 | 0.32 |
| xT per match | 1.2 | 0.72 |
| xTA per match | 0.77 | 1.4 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 24 | 20 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.21 | 0.25 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.32 | 0.26 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.23 | 0.22 |
| Entries into the box per match | 13 | 6 |
| Entries into the box against | 9 | 20 |
| Pass completion % | 0.78 | 0.7 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.7 | 0.65 |
| Passes per match | 350 | 269 |
| Passes against per match | 278 | 391 |
| Switches of play per match | 30.6 | 16.2 |
| Long balls per match | 33 | 27 |
| Set pieces | Osijek | Slaven Belupo |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0 | 0.01 |
| Corners per match | 5.8 | 3.5 |
| Corners against per match | 2.8 | 6.1 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.52 | 0.21 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.55 | 0.58 |
| Other | Osijek | Slaven Belupo |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.73 | 0.66 |
| The goalkeepers | Marko Malenica (Osijek) | Karlo Sentić (Slaven Belupo) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 8 | 15 |
| Save % | 62% | 63% |
| xG prevented | 58% | 50% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Osijek a 52% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Osijek 52%, draw 27%, Slaven Belupo 21%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 48% and under at 52%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 51% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.