01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Lyngby or draw (1X)70%
- Over 1.5 goals80%
Danish SuperligaLyngby Stadion, Kongens Lyngby17°7,6 mm22 km/h
Läs på svenskaAnna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
41% is the figure that stands out. It leans towards Lyngby, suggesting the hosts are slight favorites against Odense despite trailing in points. However, the expected goals tell a different story, with Lyngby leading at 1.67 to Odense's 1.34. This paints a picture of a tighter contest than the points table might suggest, hinting at a clash where current form perhaps edges history.
The most probable scoreline is 1-1, but the 58% over 2.5 goals probability indicates the potential for more action. Both teams prefer possession and high pressing, likely leading to an open game. Yet, the expected rain could dampen scoring opportunities, a factor already considered in the model's calculations. While Lyngby have an edge in xPoints and xGA, Odense’s actual points tally gives them a psychological boost.
Yet, odds of 3.2 on an Odense win with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet offer intriguing value, matching the model's away win probability at a 5% edge. Given this, the sharp betting angle is on the away odds, with a nod to a potential over 2.5 goals. Expect a narrow victory for either side, possibly 2-1, leaning toward Lyngby, with weather conditions as a wildcard.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Lyngby | X | 2 · Odense |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betfair Exchange | 1.12 | 1.61 | 1.61 |
| Betsafe | 2.05 | 3.60 | EV+ 10% 3.35 |
| Betsson | 2.08 | 3.65 | EV+ 10% 3.35 |
| Nordicbet | 2.08 | 3.65 | EV+ 10% 3.35 |
| Paddy Power | 2.30 | 3.60 | 2.60 |
| Pinnacle | 2.06 | EV+ 2% 3.94 | EV+ 10% 3.35 |
Odds updated 30 Aug, 11:35
2.00 → 2.06
3.71 → 3.94
3.51 → 3.35
Pinnacle · 15 recorded price levels · 24/08/2026 → 30/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Lyngby | Odense |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 2 | 4 |
| xPoints | 8.7 | 7.2 |
| xG per match | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| xGA per match | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.51 | 0.34 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.34 | 0.19 |
| Playing style | Lyngby | Odense |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.32 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.71 | 0.51 |
| xT per match | 1.5 | 1.2 |
| xTA per match | 0.66 | 1.1 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 40 | 26 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.33 | 0.28 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.31 | 0.23 |
| Entries into the box per match | 19 | 12 |
| Entries into the box against | 11 | 15 |
| Pass completion % | 0.73 | 0.78 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.71 | 0.73 |
| Passes per match | 366 | 406 |
| Passes against per match | 320 | 412 |
| Switches of play per match | 11.3 | 22.5 |
| Long balls per match | 24 | 26 |
| Set pieces | Lyngby | Odense |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.12 | 0.01 |
| Corners per match | 5.9 | 5.6 |
| Corners against per match | 3.4 | 8 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.43 | 0.21 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.59 | 0.65 |
| Other | Lyngby | Odense |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.63 | 0.71 |
| The goalkeepers | Diego Kochen (Lyngby) | Viljar Myhra (Odense) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 10 | 11 |
| Save % | 50% | 69% |
| xG prevented | 33% | 59% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Lyngby a 41% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Lyngby 41%, draw 26%, Odense 33%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 58% and under at 42%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 60% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.