Eerste Divisie19°23 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    DordrechtDordrechtPossession control
    36
    Jong AZJong AZPossession control
    The model's lean: 1 · Dordrecht (45%)

    DordrechtJong AZ · Eerste Divisie

    1 · Dordrecht 45%X 25%31% Jong AZ · 2

    Analysis: DordrechtJong AZ

    Sofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work

    The numbers suggest an intriguing tilt between Dordrecht and Jong AZ, where the hosts have a slight statistical edge, yet their form is less compelling than the model might imply. Despite Dordrecht's 45% win probability and a model lean in their favor, the expected goals for both sides are close: 1.89 for Dordrecht against 1.53 for the visitors. This balance hints at a tense affair, with both teams capable of finding the net.

    The head-to-head record, though inconclusive with just four encounters, shows parity with each team claiming a win and drawing twice. However, when delving into form, Jong AZ's stronger xPoints of 7.1 compared to Dordrecht’s 4.0 emphasizes their potential to outperform, aligning with their role as slight underdogs worth considering. Their xG and defensive stats give them a real chance to unsettle the hosts, despite the possession-control style that both teams favor.

    The goal prediction leans heavily toward a scoreline exceeding 2.5 goals, at a hefty 66% chance, supported by a 67% likelihood of both teams scoring. While Dordrecht seems more poised to control the game, Jong AZ's efficiency could exploit Dordrecht's leaky defense, averaging 2.2 xGA per match. This defensive vulnerability makes a 1-1 or 2-1 result plausible, with the former being the most likely at 10%.

    In the betting market, the potential value lies with Dordrecht's outright win at odds above the implied probability of 45%. However, given the visitors' edge in xG-related metrics and the high chance of goals, the over 2.5 goals market should tempt bettors seeking value.

    Favoring Dordrecht for a narrow 2-1 win acknowledges their statistical backing but underscores the volatility and the likely goal-rich nature of this matchup.

    DordrechtDordrecht
    Form LWDLL
    League ranking xG #16xGA #21xT #8xP/match #19Points #15
    Key players
    • Sem ValkCBxG 0.08 · xT 0.03
    • Martin VetkalFxG 0.03 · xT 0.05
    • Nick VenemaRWxG 0.07 · xT 0.36
    Jong AZJong AZ
    Form LWLLW
    League ranking xG #10xGA #4xT #16xP/match #10Points #10
    Key players
    • Ayoub OufkirFxG 0.52 · xT 0.24
    • Julian OeripCAMxG 0.22 · xT 0.11
    • Jesper ZwartRWBxG 0.05 · xT 0.09
    Final score
    36
    The model missed the outcome
    Predicted probabilities: Dordrecht 45% · Draw 25% · Jong AZ 31%

    How the bookmaker bet builders went

    The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.

    Matchresultat - DordrechtBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 4,78fair 5,35-11 %
    Miss

    Match prediction: DordrechtJong AZ

    Predicted score matrix

    Jong AZ
    Dordrecht
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–03.6%
    0–14.8%
    0–23.8%
    0–32.0%
    0–4+1.1%
    1
    1–05.9%
    1–19.8%
    1–27.2%
    1–33.7%
    1–4+2.0%
    2
    2–05.9%
    2–18.9%
    2–26.8%
    2–33.5%
    2–4+1.9%
    3
    3–03.7%
    3–15.6%
    3–24.3%
    3–32.2%
    3–4+1.2%
    4+
    4+–02.7%
    4+–14.1%
    4+–23.1%
    4+–31.6%
    4+–4+0.9%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-110%
    2. 2.2-19%
    3. 3.1-27%
    4. 4.2-27%
    5. 5.1-06%
    Expected goals
    1,891,53
    Both teams to score
    67%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 3,4
    Under 2,534%
    @2.72
    Over 2,566%
    @1.44

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Dordrecht or draw (1X)69%
    • Over 1.5 goals86%

    Combined probability

    59%

    Fair odds

    1.68

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Dordrecht or draw (1X)69%
    • Over 2.5 goals66%
    • Seung-Gyun Bae to score25%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score67%
    • Over 2.5 goals66%
    • Seung-Gyun Bae to score25%
    • Julian Sijbrands to be booked24%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    Bookmaker1 · DordrechtX2 · Jong AZ
    Betsafe2.223.602.80
    Betsson2.223.602.80
    Nordicbet2.223.602.80

    Odds updated 4 Sept, 02:37

    Odds movement

    10 %
    44 %39 %

    2.222.22

    X0 %
    28 %23 %

    3.603.60

    20 %
    36 %31 %

    2.802.80

    Over 2,5+2 %
    68 %63 %

    1.411.44

    Betsson · 5 recorded price levels · 01/09/2026 → 04/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    4 matches
    Dordrecht 1Draw 2Jong AZ 1
    Goals: 56 (⌀ 2,8)

    Head-to-head based on Eerste Divisie data since 2023.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Dordrecht
    Jong AZ
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Dordrecht (510)
    Jong AZ (99)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Dordrecht
    Jaden Pinas: 167 passningar, xT 0.19PinasCalvin Owen Harm Raatsie: 167 passningar, xT 0.24RaatsieAyoub Ouarghi: 130 passningar, xT 0.49OuarghiSenne Vugts: 129 passningar, xT 0.52VugtsYannis M'Bemba: 115 passningar, xT 0.2M'BembaAdil Lechkar: 109 passningar, xT 0.07LechkarJurre Van Aken: 101 passningar, xT 0.52AkenBeni Christophe Mpanzu: 99 passningar, xT 0.69MpanzuSem Valk: 92 passningar, xT 0.05ValkNick Venema: 87 passningar, xT 1.15VenemaBjörn Bryan Hardley: 51 passningar, xT 0.08Hardley
    Jong AZ
    Julian Oerip: 218 passningar, xT 0.46OeripJesper Zwart: 212 passningar, xT 0.38ZwartRion Ichihara: 174 passningar, xT 0.59IchiharaMathijs Menu: 169 passningar, xT 0.29MenuAndrea Natali: 121 passningar, xT 0.18NataliSam de Grand: 111 passningar, xT 0.3GrandRio Robbemond: 107 passningar, xT 0.16RobbemondJulian Sijbrands: 103 passningar, xT 0.09SijbrandsKiyani Zeggen: 102 passningar, xT 0.14ZeggenBilly van Duijl: 92 passningar, xT 0.35DuijlAyoub Oufkir: 87 passningar, xT 0.42Oufkir
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Dordrecht
    Jaden Pinas: 167 passningar, xT 0.19PinasCalvin Owen Harm Raatsie: 167 passningar, xT 0.24RaatsieAyoub Ouarghi: 130 passningar, xT 0.49OuarghiSenne Vugts: 129 passningar, xT 0.52VugtsYannis M'Bemba: 115 passningar, xT 0.2M'BembaAdil Lechkar: 109 passningar, xT 0.07LechkarJurre Van Aken: 101 passningar, xT 0.52AkenBeni Christophe Mpanzu: 99 passningar, xT 0.69MpanzuSem Valk: 92 passningar, xT 0.05ValkNick Venema: 87 passningar, xT 1.15VenemaBjörn Bryan Hardley: 51 passningar, xT 0.08Hardley
    Jong AZ
    Julian Oerip: 218 passningar, xT 0.46OeripJesper Zwart: 212 passningar, xT 0.38ZwartRion Ichihara: 174 passningar, xT 0.59IchiharaMathijs Menu: 169 passningar, xT 0.29MenuAndrea Natali: 121 passningar, xT 0.18NataliSam de Grand: 111 passningar, xT 0.3GrandRio Robbemond: 107 passningar, xT 0.16RobbemondJulian Sijbrands: 103 passningar, xT 0.09SijbrandsKiyani Zeggen: 102 passningar, xT 0.14ZeggenBilly van Duijl: 92 passningar, xT 0.35DuijlAyoub Oufkir: 87 passningar, xT 0.42Oufkir

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceDordrechtJong AZ
    Points46
    xPoints47.1
    xG per match1.11.4
    xGA per match2.21.1
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.170.09
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.380.11
    Playing styleDordrechtJong AZ
    Build-up efficiency0.310.32
    Field tilt0.540.55
    xT per match1.31
    xTA per match10.9
    Won balls, offensive half2524
    Pressing intensity0.250.22
    Pressing efficiency0.310.3
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.250.22
    Entries into the box per match1418
    Entries into the box against1411
    Pass completion %0.780.78
    Pass completion % under pressure0.710.73
    Passes per match369413
    Passes against per match298346
    Switches of play per match28.226.8
    Long balls per match5152
    Set piecesDordrechtJong AZ
    xG from free kicks0.10.02
    Corners per match5.84.7
    Corners against per match4.54.5
    xG per corner0.020.01
    xGA per corner against0.010.04
    First touch, offensive corners %0.430.5
    First touch, defensive corners %0.440.62
    OtherDordrechtJong AZ
    Throw-in control0.690.83
    The goalkeepersCalvin Owen Harm Raatsie (Dordrecht)Kiyani Zeggen (Jong AZ)
    Saves178
    Save %63%67%
    xG prevented41%51%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Dordrecht vs Jong AZ according to our model?

    The model gives Dordrecht a 45% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Dordrecht 45%, draw 25%, Jong AZ 31%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 10% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 66% and under at 34%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 67% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.