01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Emmen to win47%
- Over 1.5 goals85%
Eerste Divisie14°1,0 mm15 km/h
Läs på svenskaSofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
Emmen's 47% win probability stands out as the key figure here, reflecting their stronger recent form and statistical edges. The hosts have garnered 12 points compared to De Graafschap's meager 1, alongside superior xG and xGA metrics. Emmen's xG of 1.9 per match significantly surpasses the visitors' 1.2, highlighting their attacking potential. The visitors are on a four-match losing streak, which further tilts the scales in favor of the hosts.
Despite a small head-to-head sample, Emmen's record of three wins in four matches since 2023 suggests a psychological and tactical upper hand. However, the expected goals for both teams and model's most likely scorelines point to a close match, with a 65% chance for both teams to score and for the total to exceed 2.5 goals. The expected rain could temper some attacking momentum, but this is already considered in the model's numbers.
The sharpest angle lies with the under 2.5 goals market, where Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet offer odds of 3.35. The model rates this outcome at 35%, presenting a 19% value edge. While the game leans towards Emmen, the potential for fewer goals than anticipated offers a compelling betting angle.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Emmen | X | 2 · De Graafschap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.70 | 3.85 | EV+ 21% 4.25 |
| Betsson | 1.70 | 3.85 | EV+ 21% 4.25 |
| Nordicbet | 1.70 | 3.85 | EV+ 21% 4.25 |
Odds updated 11 Sept, 05:36
Market signal
The market has moved clearly towards a Emmen win since 6 September — the odds have shortened from 2.08 to 1.70 (−18%).
2.08 → 1.70
3.85 → 3.85
2.95 → 4.25
1.29 → 1.35
Nordicbet · 26 recorded price levels · 06/09/2026 → 11/09/2026 · fixed scale 20 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Eerste Divisie data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Emmen | De Graafschap |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 12 | 1 |
| xPoints | 7.7 | 4.7 |
| xG per match | 1.9 | 1.2 |
| xGA per match | 1.3 | 2 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.25 | 0.22 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.08 | 0.1 |
| Playing style | Emmen | De Graafschap |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.34 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.62 | 0.55 |
| xT per match | 1.6 | 1 |
| xTA per match | 0.93 | 1.3 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 28 | 25 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.31 | 0.36 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.3 | 0.33 |
| Entries into the box per match | 21 | 13 |
| Entries into the box against | 10 | 14 |
| Pass completion % | 0.77 | 0.77 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.76 | 0.7 |
| Passes per match | 369 | 397 |
| Passes against per match | 338 | 282 |
| Switches of play per match | 24.7 | 39.5 |
| Long balls per match | 31 | 48 |
| Set pieces | Emmen | De Graafschap |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0 | 0.04 |
| Corners per match | 5.6 | 4.6 |
| Corners against per match | 2.6 | 4.8 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.41 | 0.7 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.62 | 0.79 |
| Other | Emmen | De Graafschap |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.76 | 0.77 |
| The goalkeepers | Sam Karssies (Emmen) | Ties Wieggers (De Graafschap) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 13 | 15 |
| Save % | 52% | 47% |
| xG prevented | 34% | 27% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Emmen a 47% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Emmen 47%, draw 25%, De Graafschap 29%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 10% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 65% and under at 35%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 65% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.