Eerste Divisie18°2,6 mm28 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    EmmenEmmenBalanced & physical
    vs
    VolendamVolendamPossession control
    The model's lean: 1 · Emmen (44%)Best value by the model: Under 2,5 @ 2.82 (+21 %)

    EmmenVolendam · Eerste Divisie

    1 · Emmen 44%X 28%29% Volendam · 2

    Analysis: EmmenVolendam

    Sofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work

    The numbers hint at a tight affair between Emmen and Volendam, with Emmen holding a slight edge in the model's eyes. The home side is given a 44% chance to secure victory, a reflection of their slightly better league position. However, Volendam's superior xG per match at 2.4 compared to Emmen's 1.9 suggests the visitors could create more high-quality chances. This clash of styles — Emmen's physicality against Volendam's possession play — may define the game.

    Despite Emmen's three-point lead in actual points, the xPoints tell a different story, slightly favoring Volendam with 6.6 to Emmen's 5.9. This discrepancy highlights the hosts' tendency to overperform relative to their underlying metrics. The head-to-head record since 2023 is balanced at one win each, but with only two matches played, it's not a reliable predictor of the outcome.

    Weather conditions could play a part, with 3.4 mm of rain expected, potentially dampening attacking play and already considered in the model's cautious 57% chance for over 2.5 goals. Both teams seem likely to find the net, with a 59% probability of both scoring. Given these dynamics, a 1-1 draw is the most probable scoreline at 11%, followed closely by a narrow 2-1 victory for the hosts.

    The sharpest angle lies in the under 2.5 goals market. Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet offer this at odds of 2.82, presenting a 21% edge according to the model's valuation. While the match promises potential for goals, the sizable edge on the under makes it a compelling option for those looking for value.

    EmmenEmmen
    Form WWWWL
    League ranking xG #6xGA #8xT #3xP/match #9Points #5
    Key players
    • Jack Cooper-LoveFxG 0.65 · xT 0.04
    • Nelson Efosa AmadinRWxG 0.29 · xT 0.10
    • Michael John BreijRWxG 0.19 · xT 0.20
    VolendamVolendam
    Form LLWLW
    League ranking xG #2xGA #3xT #12xP/match #5Points #11
    Key players
    • Nick DoodemanRWxG 0.13 · xT 0.42
    • Henk VeermanLWxG 0.91 · xT 0.15
    • Luca BlondeauCBxG 0.02 · xT 0.04

    Match prediction: EmmenVolendam

    Predicted score matrix

    Volendam
    Emmen
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–05.4%
    0–16.0%
    0–24.0%
    0–31.7%
    0–4+0.7%
    1
    1–08.5%
    1–111.3%
    1–26.9%
    1–32.9%
    1–4+1.2%
    2
    2–07.6%
    2–19.5%
    2–25.9%
    2–32.5%
    2–4+1.0%
    3
    3–04.4%
    3–15.5%
    3–23.4%
    3–31.4%
    3–4+0.6%
    4+
    4+–02.8%
    4+–13.5%
    4+–22.2%
    4+–30.9%
    4+–4+0.4%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-111%
    2. 2.2-110%
    3. 3.1-08%
    4. 4.2-08%
    5. 5.1-27%
    Expected goals
    1,731,25
    Both teams to score
    59%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 3,0
    Under 2,543%
    @2.82EV+21%
    Over 2,557%
    @1.41

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Emmen or draw (1X)73%
    • Over 1.5 goals80%

    Combined probability

    59%

    Fair odds

    1.70

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Emmen or draw (1X)73%
    • Over 2.5 goals57%
    • Freddy Quispel to score24%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score59%
    • Over 2.5 goals57%
    • Freddy Quispel to score24%
    • Nick Verschuren to be booked21%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • Under 2.543% probability@2.82BetsafeEV+21%reference odds
    • Under 2.543% probability@2.82BetssonEV+21%reference odds
    • Under 2.543% probability@2.82NordicbetEV+21%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · EmmenX2 · Volendam
    Betsafe
    EV+ 2%
    2.32
    3.602.65
    Betsson
    EV+ 2%
    2.32
    3.602.65
    Nordicbet
    EV+ 2%
    2.32
    3.602.65

    Odds updated 4 Sept, 00:36

    Odds movement

    Market signal

    The market has moved clearly towards a Emmen win since 31 August — the odds have shortened from 3.05 to 2.32 (−24%).

    1-24 %
    45 %25 %

    3.052.32

    X0 %
    36 %16 %

    3.603.60

    2+29 %
    49 %29 %

    2.052.65

    Over 2,5-9 %
    74 %54 %

    1.551.41

    Betsson · 17 recorded price levels · 31/08/2026 → 04/09/2026 · fixed scale 20 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    2 matches
    Emmen 1Draw 0Volendam 1
    Goals: 22 (⌀ 2)

    Head-to-head based on Eerste Divisie data since 2023.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Emmen
    Volendam
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Emmen (109)
    Volendam (115)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Emmen
    Yanis Dede-Lhomme: 249 passningar, xT 1.54Dede-LhommeJoshua Mukeh: 204 passningar, xT 0.1MukehLuca Everink: 171 passningar, xT 0.45EverinkCasper Staring: 158 passningar, xT 0.62StaringBryan Albert Van Hove: 125 passningar, xT 0.47HoveMichael John Breij: 114 passningar, xT 0.65BreijSam Karssies: 108 passningar, xT 0.25KarssiesFreddy Quispel: 77 passningar, xT 0.21QuispelNelson Efosa Amadin: 64 passningar, xT 0.43AmadinSybrand Veldhuis: 58 passningar, xT 0.44VeldhuisJack Cooper-Love: 56 passningar, xT 0.06Cooper-Love
    Volendam
    Precious Joel Uche-Chukwu Ugwu: 189 passningar, xT 0.26UgwuDaan Huisman: 154 passningar, xT 0.12HuismanRoy Johannes Maria Steur: 150 passningar, xT 0.32SteurErik Schouten: 145 passningar, xT 0.31SchoutenNordin Bukala: 132 passningar, xT 0.17BukalaLuca Blondeau: 123 passningar, xT 0.12BlondeauMawouna Amevor: 99 passningar, xT 0.14AmevorNick Doodeman: 84 passningar, xT 1.56DoodemanMike Kleijn: 56 passningar, xT 0.33KleijnAlex Plat: 53 passningar, xT 0.22PlatKayden Wolff: 51 passningar, xT 0.37Wolff
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Emmen
    Yanis Dede-Lhomme: 249 passningar, xT 1.54Dede-LhommeJoshua Mukeh: 204 passningar, xT 0.1MukehLuca Everink: 171 passningar, xT 0.45EverinkCasper Staring: 158 passningar, xT 0.62StaringBryan Albert Van Hove: 125 passningar, xT 0.47HoveMichael John Breij: 114 passningar, xT 0.65BreijSam Karssies: 108 passningar, xT 0.25KarssiesFreddy Quispel: 77 passningar, xT 0.21QuispelNelson Efosa Amadin: 64 passningar, xT 0.43AmadinSybrand Veldhuis: 58 passningar, xT 0.44VeldhuisJack Cooper-Love: 56 passningar, xT 0.06Cooper-Love
    Volendam
    Precious Joel Uche-Chukwu Ugwu: 189 passningar, xT 0.26UgwuDaan Huisman: 154 passningar, xT 0.12HuismanRoy Johannes Maria Steur: 150 passningar, xT 0.32SteurErik Schouten: 145 passningar, xT 0.31SchoutenNordin Bukala: 132 passningar, xT 0.17BukalaLuca Blondeau: 123 passningar, xT 0.12BlondeauMawouna Amevor: 99 passningar, xT 0.14AmevorNick Doodeman: 84 passningar, xT 1.56DoodemanMike Kleijn: 56 passningar, xT 0.33KleijnAlex Plat: 53 passningar, xT 0.22PlatKayden Wolff: 51 passningar, xT 0.37Wolff

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceEmmenVolendam
    Points96
    xPoints5.96.6
    xG per match1.92.4
    xGA per match1.31.1
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.230.3
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.020.05
    Playing styleEmmenVolendam
    Build-up efficiency0.340.31
    Field tilt0.590.53
    xT per match1.61.2
    xTA per match0.930.96
    Won balls, offensive half2926
    Pressing intensity0.240.23
    Pressing efficiency0.30.3
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.310.27
    Entries into the box per match2014
    Entries into the box against1010
    Pass completion %0.780.76
    Pass completion % under pressure0.760.69
    Passes per match380366
    Passes against per match340333
    Switches of play per match26.131
    Long balls per match3242
    Set piecesEmmenVolendam
    xG from free kicks00.34
    Corners per match5.54.8
    Corners against per match2.86.3
    xG per corner0.030.02
    xGA per corner against0.010.01
    First touch, offensive corners %0.380.42
    First touch, defensive corners %0.640.72
    OtherEmmenVolendam
    Throw-in control0.780.76
    The goalkeepersSam Karssies (Emmen)Roy Johannes Maria Steur (Volendam)
    Saves913
    Save %50%77%
    xG prevented34%53%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Emmen vs Volendam according to our model?

    The model gives Emmen a 44% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Emmen 44%, draw 28%, Volendam 29%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 57% and under at 43%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 59% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.