Eerste Divisie15°2,7 mm14 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Helmond SportHelmond SportLow block & direct
    vs
    Jong PSVJong PSVPossession & high press
    The model's lean: 2 · Jong PSV (49%)

    Helmond SportJong PSV · Eerste Divisie

    1 · Helmond Sport 28%X 23%49% Jong PSV · 2

    Analysis: Helmond SportJong PSV

    Marcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work

    With only four matches played between Helmond Sport and Jong PSV since 2023, the head-to-head record is too slender to outshine the clear patterns in current form and expected goals. The visitors have had the upper hand with two victories, but the sample size is small. For this particular matchup, the form book and model predictions lean heavily towards Jong PSV, buoyed by their possession-based approach and high press, which contrasts sharply with Helmond's more direct, low-defence setup.

    The model gives Jong PSV a 49% chance of winning, supported by their superior xG (1.7 per match) compared to Helmond's 1.1. Helmond's defensive vulnerabilities are highlighted by their xGA of 1.8, much higher than Jong PSV's 1.2. This suggests that the visitors are not only more likely to find the net but also more capable of keeping the hosts at bay. With both teams predicted to score at a rate of 63%, the likelihood of a lively encounter is strong, but all indicators suggest the scales tip in favor of the visitors.

    Scoreline predictions reinforce this narrative. The most probable outcomes are a 1-1 draw and a 1-2 victory for Jong PSV, each at 10%, with a 7% chance of the visitors winning 0-2. Over 2.5 goals are expected in 63% of scenarios, aligning with the visitors' attacking potential and Helmond's defensive frailties. While a tight contest isn't off the table, Jong PSV's offensive prowess and Helmond's leaky defense signal a probable away victory.

    For bettors, the away win at odds of 2.35 with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet presents a clear edge, rated by the model with a 16% value advantage. Given the statistical backing and potential payout, this wager stands out as the sharpest play for those looking to capitalize on the evening's action.

    Helmond SportHelmond Sport
    Form DLDLW
    League ranking xG #18xGA #16xT #20xP/match #12Points #14
    Key players
    • Mauro LenaertsFxG 0.51 · xT 0.00
    • Livio CiceroRWxG 0.20 · xT 0.30
    • Sem DekkersRWBxG 0.05 · xT 0.20
    Jong PSVJong PSV
    Form LWDDW
    League ranking xG #7xGA #5xT #13xP/match #3Points #4
    Key players
    • Austyn Monet JonesFxG 0.71 · xT -0.01
    • Jordy BawuahCDMxG 0.10 · xT 0.06
    • Madi MonamayCBxG 0.07 · xT 0.07

    Match prediction: Helmond SportJong PSV

    Predicted score matrix

    Jong PSV
    Helmond Sport
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–04.1%
    0–17.1%
    0–27.2%
    0–34.7%
    0–4+3.5%
    1
    1–04.7%
    1–110.1%
    1–29.5%
    1–36.2%
    1–4+4.7%
    2
    2–03.3%
    2–16.5%
    2–26.3%
    2–34.1%
    2–4+3.1%
    3
    3–01.5%
    3–12.9%
    3–22.8%
    3–31.8%
    3–4+1.4%
    4+
    4+–00.7%
    4+–11.3%
    4+–21.2%
    4+–30.8%
    4+–4+0.6%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-110%
    2. 2.1-210%
    3. 3.0-27%
    4. 4.0-17%
    5. 5.2-16%
    Expected goals
    1,321,95
    Both teams to score
    63%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 3,3
    Under 2,537%
    Over 2,563%

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Jong PSV to win49%
    • Over 1.5 goals84%

    Combined probability

    44%

    Fair odds

    2.25

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Jong PSV to win49%
    • Over 2.5 goals63%
    • Jim Koller to score27%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score63%
    • Over 2.5 goals63%
    • Jim Koller to score27%
    • Michel-Simon Ludwig to be booked21%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 2 · Jong PSV49% probability@2.25BetsafeEV+11%reference odds
    • 2 · Jong PSV49% probability@2.25BetssonEV+11%reference odds
    • 2 · Jong PSV49% probability@2.25NordicbetEV+11%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Helmond SportX2 · Jong PSV
    Betsafe2.553.45
    EV+ 11%
    2.25
    Betsson2.553.45
    EV+ 11%
    2.25
    Nordicbet2.553.45
    EV+ 11%
    2.25

    Odds updated 11 Sept, 09:38

    Odds movement

    1+5 %
    38 %33 %

    2.422.55

    X0 %
    29 %24 %

    3.453.45

    2-4 %
    41 %36 %

    2.352.25

    Betsson · 10 recorded price levels · 09/09/2026 → 11/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    4 matches
    Helmond Sport 1Draw 1Jong PSV 2
    Goals: 69 (⌀ 3,8)

    Head-to-head based on Eerste Divisie data since 2023.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Helmond Sport
    Jong PSV
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Helmond Sport (99)
    Jong PSV (119)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Helmond Sport
    Tijn Landheer: 221 passningar, xT 0.22LandheerBrian Koglin: 181 passningar, xT 0.3KoglinMichel Ludwig: 150 passningar, xT -0.07LudwigMenno Bergsen: 134 passningar, xT 0.04BergsenSem Dekkers: 123 passningar, xT 0.78DekkersXander Jan Van der Velde: 123 passningar, xT 0.31VeldeWassim Lantaki: 120 passningar, xT 0.5LantakiHelgi Frodi Ingason: 69 passningar, xT 0.25IngasonThomas Poll: 50 passningar, xT 0.11PollLivio Cicero: 48 passningar, xT 0.97CiceroJoep van der Sluijs: 32 passningar, xT -0.01Sluijs
    Jong PSV
    Fabian Merién: 259 passningar, xT 0.13MeriénMadi Monamay: 208 passningar, xT 0.2MonamayKhadim Ngom: 167 passningar, xT 0.13NgomGino Verhulst: 159 passningar, xT 0.35VerhulstEssien Bassey: 142 passningar, xT 0.51BasseyMichael Bresser: 135 passningar, xT 0.3BresserShuryjano Cornecion: 100 passningar, xT 0.59CornecionFabio Kluit: 98 passningar, xT 0.32KluitJordy Bawuah: 74 passningar, xT 0.06BawuahJoël van den Berg: 74 passningar, xT 0BergSouleymane Lamine Sidibe: 72 passningar, xT 0.03Sidibe
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Helmond Sport
    Tijn Landheer: 221 passningar, xT 0.22LandheerBrian Koglin: 181 passningar, xT 0.3KoglinMichel Ludwig: 150 passningar, xT -0.07LudwigMenno Bergsen: 134 passningar, xT 0.04BergsenSem Dekkers: 123 passningar, xT 0.78DekkersXander Jan Van der Velde: 123 passningar, xT 0.31VeldeWassim Lantaki: 120 passningar, xT 0.5LantakiHelgi Frodi Ingason: 69 passningar, xT 0.25IngasonThomas Poll: 50 passningar, xT 0.11PollLivio Cicero: 48 passningar, xT 0.97CiceroJoep van der Sluijs: 32 passningar, xT -0.01Sluijs
    Jong PSV
    Fabian Merién: 259 passningar, xT 0.13MeriénMadi Monamay: 208 passningar, xT 0.2MonamayKhadim Ngom: 167 passningar, xT 0.13NgomGino Verhulst: 159 passningar, xT 0.35VerhulstEssien Bassey: 142 passningar, xT 0.51BasseyMichael Bresser: 135 passningar, xT 0.3BresserShuryjano Cornecion: 100 passningar, xT 0.59CornecionFabio Kluit: 98 passningar, xT 0.32KluitJordy Bawuah: 74 passningar, xT 0.06BawuahJoël van den Berg: 74 passningar, xT 0BergSouleymane Lamine Sidibe: 72 passningar, xT 0.03Sidibe

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceHelmond SportJong PSV
    Points511
    xPoints6.510.2
    xG per match1.11.7
    xGA per match1.81.2
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.190.2
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.20.22
    Playing styleHelmond SportJong PSV
    Build-up efficiency0.30.29
    Field tilt0.320.6
    xT per match0.851.1
    xTA per match1.41.1
    Won balls, offensive half2226
    Pressing intensity0.240.24
    Pressing efficiency0.260.38
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.20.34
    Entries into the box per match1013
    Entries into the box against2013
    Pass completion %0.730.77
    Pass completion % under pressure0.620.72
    Passes per match271396
    Passes against per match447280
    Switches of play per match25.126.5
    Long balls per match3140
    Set piecesHelmond SportJong PSV
    xG from free kicks00.02
    Corners per match4.45.7
    Corners against per match64.5
    xG per corner0.020.03
    xGA per corner against0.040.04
    First touch, offensive corners %0.270.53
    First touch, defensive corners %0.430.63
    OtherHelmond SportJong PSV
    Throw-in control0.720.77
    The goalkeepersMenno Bergsen (Helmond Sport)Khadim Ngom (Jong PSV)
    Saves2316
    Save %72%73%
    xG prevented55%76%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Helmond Sport vs Jong PSV according to our model?

    The model gives Jong PSV a 49% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Helmond Sport 28%, draw 23%, Jong PSV 49%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 10% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 63% and under at 37%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 63% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.