01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Heracles Almelo to win56%
- Over 1.5 goals84%
Eerste Divisie14°2,1 mm25 km/h
Läs på svenskaMarcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
Heracles Almelo arrives at this fixture buoyed by a potent five-match winning streak, a pattern that speaks volumes about their current form. The small head-to-head sample against Jong Almere City means less here, allowing us to focus more on the teams' present dynamics and statistical strengths. The visitors have a clear upper hand reflected in their superior xG and xGA numbers, highlighting their effectiveness in both creating and preventing chances.
Jong Almere City, while possessing home advantage, face a daunting task given their defensive vulnerabilities. Their style leans heavily on a low defensive line and direct play, often leaving gaps that a counter-attacking side like Heracles is primed to exploit. The expected goals model paints a picture of a match where Heracles' crosses and counter-attacks could slice through Jong Almere’s defenses, with 1.87 xG for Heracles suggesting multiple scoring opportunities.
Weather conditions with rain could temper the attacking flow slightly, yet the model still suggests over 2.5 goals is a robust 63%. The numbers favor both teams to score at 64%, implying that while Jong Almere City might find the net, their defensive frailties could ultimately be their undoing. Heracles' tactical setup seems perfectly suited to capitalize on the hosts’ weaknesses, even if Jong Almere slots home a consolation.
Given these considerations, Heracles Almelo stands out as the likely winner, perhaps with a 1-2 scoreline. The model's probabilities offer a decisive lean toward Heracles with a 56% chance of victory. Those seeking value should note the 1-2 scoreline is evaluated at around 9%, suggesting a potential edge in odds.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Jong Almere City | Heracles Almelo |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 9 | 15 |
| xPoints | 5.7 | 10.9 |
| xG per match | 1.6 | 2.7 |
| xGA per match | 1.6 | 0.92 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.14 | 0.36 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.16 | 0.23 |
| Playing style | Jong Almere City | Heracles Almelo |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.29 | 0.3 |
| Field tilt | 0.36 | 0.68 |
| xT per match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| xTA per match | 1.1 | 0.87 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 24 | 32 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.25 | 0.21 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.27 | 0.37 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.2 | 0.32 |
| Entries into the box per match | 13 | 14 |
| Entries into the box against | 14 | 9 |
| Pass completion % | 0.7 | 0.72 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.63 | 0.67 |
| Passes per match | 249 | 314 |
| Passes against per match | 395 | 275 |
| Switches of play per match | 21.2 | 19.4 |
| Long balls per match | 38 | 36 |
| Set pieces | Jong Almere City | Heracles Almelo |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.06 | 0 |
| Corners per match | 5.2 | 7.5 |
| Corners against per match | 6.7 | 4 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.43 | 0.37 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.44 | 0.5 |
| Other | Jong Almere City | Heracles Almelo |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.72 | 0.8 |
| The goalkeepers | Wessel Speel (Jong Almere City) | Fabian de Keijzer (Heracles Almelo) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 18 | 12 |
| Save % | 86% | 63% |
| xG prevented | 76% | 39% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Heracles Almelo a 56% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Jong Almere City 24%, draw 20%, Heracles Almelo 56%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 10% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 63% and under at 37%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 64% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.