01 · 2 legs
Safe
- NAC Breda to win75%
- Over 1.5 goals83%
Eerste Divisie16°2,1 mm16 km/h
Läs på svenskaSofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
NAC Breda enters their clash against Jong Utrecht with a commanding 75% probability of victory, as per the model's lean. The hosts boast a significant advantage in expected goals, clocking in at 2.36 compared to the visitors' 0.87. This gap underscores Breda's superior attacking capabilities and suggests a likely outcome in their favor.
Despite both teams favoring a possession style, Breda's combination of high press and control seems more effective, reflected in their 7 points against Utrecht's single point. Notably, Breda's defensive stats are superior, conceding 1.6 xGA per match compared to Utrecht's 2.0. However, Utrecht's xPoints are surprisingly close, indicating a potential for resilience in their play. The most probable scoreline according to the data is 2-0, but a 2-1 is also plausible, with a 63% chance for over 2.5 goals and a 53% chance for both teams to score.
For those eyeing value, the under 3.5 goals market offers a noteworthy edge. Available at 1.82 with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet, the model rates this outcome at 60%, providing a 9% advantage. This aligns with a controlled performance by the home side, suggesting a tactical victory without a goal glut.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · NAC Breda | X | 2 · Jong Utrecht |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.28 | 4.55 | 8.30 |
| Betsson | 1.28 | 4.55 | 8.30 |
| Nordicbet | 1.28 | 4.55 | 8.30 |
Odds updated 10 Sept, 18:36
1.26 → 1.28
4.55 → 4.55
8.80 → 8.30
Betsson · 3 recorded price levels · 09/09/2026 → 10/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | NAC Breda | Jong Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 7 | 1 |
| xPoints | 5.8 | 5.6 |
| xG per match | 1.7 | 1 |
| xGA per match | 1.6 | 2 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.21 | 0.16 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.24 | 0.41 |
| Playing style | NAC Breda | Jong Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.3 | 0.28 |
| Field tilt | 0.67 | 0.36 |
| xT per match | 1.4 | 0.95 |
| xTA per match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 31 | 25 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.32 | 0.26 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.33 | 0.26 |
| Entries into the box per match | 16 | 11 |
| Entries into the box against | 12 | 18 |
| Pass completion % | 0.78 | 0.71 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.73 | 0.66 |
| Passes per match | 425 | 298 |
| Passes against per match | 281 | 370 |
| Switches of play per match | 30.4 | 24.4 |
| Long balls per match | 42 | 32 |
| Set pieces | NAC Breda | Jong Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.13 | 0.02 |
| Corners per match | 6.5 | 4.9 |
| Corners against per match | 3 | 4.9 |
| xG per corner | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.01 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.36 | 0.41 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.6 | 0.64 |
| Other | NAC Breda | Jong Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.82 | 0.76 |
| The goalkeepers | Michael Robin Verrips (NAC Breda) | Mees Eppink (Jong Utrecht) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 16 | 14 |
| Save % | 62% | 58% |
| xG prevented | 46% | 49% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives NAC Breda a 75% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: NAC Breda 75%, draw 15%, Jong Utrecht 10%.
The model's most likely final score is 2-0 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 63% and under at 37%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 53% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.