01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Jong PSV to win45%
- Over 1.5 goals87%
Eerste Divisie19°1,6 mm15 km/h
Läs på svenskaErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
The numbers tilt in favor of Jong PSV, carrying a 45% model probability for victory against Jong AZ's 31%. With the hosts slightly ahead in points and expected points, the data reinforces their edge, albeit a modest one. The most likely scorelines, 1-1 and 2-1, each at 9%, signal a close contest where Jong PSV could marginally prevail. Despite the small head-to-head sample of four games, PSV's clean record—three wins and a draw—adds psychological weight that suggests they maintain the upper hand.
Expected goals of 1.93 for the hosts to 1.59 for the visitors hint at an open game, boosted by both sides' tendency towards possession-heavy strategies. The high probabilities for over 2.5 goals (68%) and both teams to score (68%) reflect this dynamic. However, the visitors' marginal defensive edge, with slightly better xGA figures, might play a role in containing the hosts' high press and possession style.
Jong AZ's approach to possession control could see them absorb pressure effectively, turning the match into a tactical battle. Yet, the hosts' aggressive high press could exploit any defensive lapses, tipping the scales in their favor. The expectation for a close encounter doesn't negate the likelihood of goal-scoring opportunities on both ends.
While the model leans towards a victory for the hosts, the draw remains a tantalizing possibility at 24%. Yet, the slight preference for a 2-1 scoreline underscores the belief in PSV's attacking potency to edge past their defensive frailties. As for the total goals market, the inclination towards over 2.5 goals aligns with the anticipated flow of the game.
Overall, the data paints Jong PSV as the likely, if not overwhelming, favorite in this contest.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Head-to-head based on Eerste Divisie data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Jong PSV | Jong AZ |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 11 | 9 |
| xPoints | 10.2 | 9.2 |
| xG per match | 1.7 | 1.6 |
| xGA per match | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.2 | 0.14 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.22 | 0.16 |
| Playing style | Jong PSV | Jong AZ |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.29 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.6 | 0.55 |
| xT per match | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| xTA per match | 1.1 | 0.88 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 26 | 26 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.22 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.38 | 0.3 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.34 | 0.24 |
| Entries into the box per match | 13 | 19 |
| Entries into the box against | 13 | 11 |
| Pass completion % | 0.77 | 0.78 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.72 | 0.72 |
| Passes per match | 396 | 398 |
| Passes against per match | 280 | 351 |
| Switches of play per match | 26.5 | 25.8 |
| Long balls per match | 40 | 48 |
| Set pieces | Jong PSV | Jong AZ |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| Corners per match | 5.7 | 4.9 |
| Corners against per match | 4.5 | 4 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.53 | 0.5 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.63 | 0.61 |
| Other | Jong PSV | Jong AZ |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.77 | 0.83 |
| The goalkeepers | Khadim Ngom (Jong PSV) | Kiyani Zeggen (Jong AZ) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 16 | 10 |
| Save % | 73% | 59% |
| xG prevented | 76% | 47% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Jong PSV a 45% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Jong PSV 45%, draw 24%, Jong AZ 31%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 9% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 68% and under at 32%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 68% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.