01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Groningen to win57%
- Over 1.5 goals80%
EredivisieEuroborg, Groningen19°2,9 mm23 km/h
Läs på svenskaSofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
Groningen boasts a 57% chance of victory against Fortuna Sittard, with their possession-driven style contrasting sharply with the visitors' low defense and direct approach. The head-to-head record is evenly split over four matches (2W-0D-2L for Groningen), showing no clear edge. However, this is a small sample and weighs less heavily than current form and expected goals.
Expected goals indicate a clear advantage for the hosts, with Groningen at 1.91 compared to Fortuna Sittard's 1.06. This aligns with the model's suggestion of a Groningen win, supported by their superior xG and xPoints figures. Yet, the presence of rain could suppress scoring, already accounted for in the model's numbers. The over 2.5 goals probability is 57%, but with both teams expected to score 56% of the time, a cagey 1-1 or 2-1 outcome is plausible.
There is notable value in the under 2.5 goals market at 2.71 odds with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet. Each presents a 17% edge according to the model's 43% rating. For a disciplined bettor, this under could present a calculated opportunity, despite the statistical lean towards a higher-scoring match.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Groningen | X | 2 · Fortuna Sittard |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.48 | EV+ 7% 4.29 | EV+ 15% 6.30 |
| Betsson | 1.48 | EV+ 7% 4.29 | EV+ 15% 6.30 |
| Nordicbet | 1.48 | EV+ 7% 4.29 | EV+ 15% 6.30 |
| Pinnacle | 1.49 | EV+ 21% 4.84 | EV+ 12% 6.12 |
Odds updated 28 Aug, 11:38
1.47 → 1.49
4.81 → 4.84
5.82 → 6.12
Pinnacle · 12 recorded price levels · 23/08/2026 → 28/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Eredivisie data since 2022.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Groningen | Fortuna Sittard |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 6 | 4 |
| xPoints | 4.1 | 3.2 |
| xG per match | 1.5 | 0.88 |
| xGA per match | 2.1 | 2.9 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.14 | 0.11 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.41 | 0.42 |
| Playing style | Groningen | Fortuna Sittard |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.32 | 0.31 |
| Field tilt | 0.39 | 0.16 |
| xT per match | 1 | 0.31 |
| xTA per match | 1.5 | 2.2 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 18 | 18 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.26 | 0.28 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.22 | 0.21 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.19 | 0.23 |
| Entries into the box per match | 11 | 8 |
| Entries into the box against | 23 | 28 |
| Pass completion % | 0.74 | 0.65 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.69 | 0.65 |
| Passes per match | 322 | 190 |
| Passes against per match | 390 | 581 |
| Switches of play per match | 18.5 | 11.1 |
| Long balls per match | 39 | 24 |
| Set pieces | Groningen | Fortuna Sittard |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0 | 0.03 |
| Corners per match | 3.6 | 2.4 |
| Corners against per match | 5 | 10.4 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.05 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.09 | 0.71 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.6 | 0.42 |
| Other | Groningen | Fortuna Sittard |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.76 | 0.64 |
| The goalkeepers | Etienne Vaessen (Groningen) | Mattijs Branderhorst (Fortuna Sittard) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 16 | 20 |
| Save % | 73% | 80% |
| xG prevented | 45% | 62% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Groningen a 57% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Groningen 57%, draw 25%, Fortuna Sittard 18%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 57% and under at 43%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 56% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.