EredivisieGoffertstadion, Nijmegen15°10 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    NECNECPossession & high press
    vs
    ExcelsiorExcelsiorPossession control
    The model's lean: 1 · NEC (63%)

    NECExcelsior · Eredivisie

    1 · NEC 63%X 21%16% Excelsior · 2

    Analysis: NECExcelsior

    Erik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work

    Twenty-five matches. That’s how long NEC have gone without failing to score in the league. It’s a record that not only suggests offensive consistency but underscores their ability to find the net against any opponent. With a model probability placing NEC as a 63% favorite and an expected goals tally of 2.18, they are clearly the team to beat against Excelsior Rotterdam.

    NEC's attacking philosophy, built around possession and high press, has effectively translated to an impressive xG per match of 2.6, compared to Excelsior Rotterdam's 1.6. Furthermore, NEC's ability to generate 0.69 xG within 8 seconds of winning the ball highlights their lethal transition play. In contrast, Excelsior Rotterdam manages just 0.25 xG under the same conditions. Despite the small head-to-head sample size — just two matches since 2022 — NEC's two victories further corroborate their superiority in this matchup.

    Numbers lean heavily towards a scoreline of 2-1, with a 10% probability, closely followed by the possibility of a 1-1 or 2-0 outcome. Both teams are expected to find the back of the net, with a 60% probability supporting that scenario. The expectation of more than 2.5 goals (64%) aligns with NEC's scoring streak and their tendency to engage in high-scoring affairs.

    Excelsior Rotterdam, with just a 16% probability of winning, are likely to struggle against NEC’s robust attack and press. Their defensive vulnerabilities are apparent in their xGA of 1.5 per match, significantly higher than NEC's 1.1.

    Given the current form and statistical edges, NEC not only have the upper hand but also present a valuable betting angle. With a reputable bookmaker offering odds that underscore NEC's expected dominance, there’s clear value (EV+) in backing NEC to win. This match looks primed for a 2-1 win for NEC, with plenty of action to satisfy those leaning toward the over 2.5 goals market.

    NECNEC
    Form DLWLW
    League ranking xG #2xGA #6xT #1xP/match #7Points #12
    Key players
    • Bryan Catharina Anna Petronella LinssenFxG 0.81 · xT 0.05
    • Dušan TadićFxG 0.15 · xT 0.37
    • Brayann PereiraRWxG 0.04 · xT 0.26
    ExcelsiorExcelsior
    Form WDWWL
    League ranking xG #9xGA #8xT #12xP/match #9Points #13
    Key players
    • Irakli YegoianRWxG 0.10 · xT 0.35
    • David GardenFxG 0.36 · xT -0.08
    • Lennard HartjesCDMxG 0.03 · xT -0.07

    Match prediction: NECExcelsior

    Predicted score matrix

    Excelsior
    NEC
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–03.9%
    0–13.9%
    0–22.3%
    0–30.9%
    0–4+0.3%
    1
    1–07.7%
    1–19.3%
    1–25.0%
    1–31.9%
    1–4+0.7%
    2
    2–08.7%
    2–19.8%
    2–25.5%
    2–32.1%
    2–4+0.7%
    3
    3–06.4%
    3–17.1%
    3–24.0%
    3–31.5%
    3–4+0.5%
    4+
    4+–05.8%
    4+–16.5%
    4+–23.6%
    4+–31.4%
    4+–4+0.5%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.2-110%
    2. 2.1-19%
    3. 3.2-09%
    4. 4.1-08%
    5. 5.3-17%
    Expected goals
    2,181,12
    Both teams to score
    60%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 3,3
    Under 2,536%
    @2.71
    Over 2,564%
    @1.42

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • NEC to win63%
    • Over 1.5 goals84%

    Combined probability

    53%

    Fair odds

    1.88

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • NEC to win63%
    • Over 2.5 goals64%
    • Tjaronn Inteff Chefren Chery to score32%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score60%
    • Over 2.5 goals64%
    • Tjaronn Inteff Chefren Chery to score32%
    • Lennard Hartjes to be booked23%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    Bookmaker1 · NECX2 · Excelsior
    Betsafe1.494.485.76
    Betsson1.494.485.76
    Nordicbet1.494.485.76

    Odds updated 18 Aug, 14:36

    Odds movement

    Market signal

    The market has moved clearly towards an Excelsior win since 15 August — the odds have shortened from 6.31 to 5.76 (−9%).

    1+4 %
    67 %62 %

    1.431.49

    X-6 %
    23 %18 %

    4.764.48

    2-9 %
    18 %13 %

    6.315.76

    Over 2,5+1 %
    68 %63 %

    1.401.42

    Betsson · 13 recorded price levels · 15/08/2026 → 18/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    2 matches
    NEC 2Draw 0Excelsior 0
    Goals: 70 (⌀ 3,5)

    Head-to-head based on Eredivisie data since 2022.

    Key facts

    • NEC have scored in 25 consecutive league matches.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    NEC
    Excelsior
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    NEC (53)
    Excelsior (52)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    NEC
    Deveron Fonville: 137 passningar, xT 0.31FonvilleBrayann Pereira: 114 passningar, xT 0.45PereiraJamiro Gregory Monteiro Alvarenga: 91 passningar, xT 0.14AlvarengaDarko Nejašmić: 90 passningar, xT 0.39NejašmićDušan Tadić: 80 passningar, xT 0.71TadićTjaronn Chery: 75 passningar, xT 0.21CheryGonzalo Alejandro Crettaz: 69 passningar, xT 0.13CrettazClement Mutahi Bischoff: 66 passningar, xT 0.7BischoffTobias Storm: 56 passningar, xT 0.13StormIsak Hansen-Aarøen: 49 passningar, xT 0.14Hansen-AarøenNoé Lebreton: 36 passningar, xT -0.1Lebreton
    Excelsior
    Jan Plug: 111 passningar, xT 0.11PlugRick Meissen: 94 passningar, xT 0.05MeissenStijn van Gassel: 84 passningar, xT 0.23GasselLennard Hartjes: 68 passningar, xT -0.12HartjesIrakli Yegoian: 59 passningar, xT 0.62YegoianCasper Ludvig Widell: 55 passningar, xT 0.07WidellSimon Janssen: 53 passningar, xT 0.69JanssenDaniël van Vianen: 45 passningar, xT -0.08VianenNolan Martens: 41 passningar, xT 0.06MartensDavid Garden: 17 passningar, xT -0.12GardenAymen Sliti: 14 passningar, xT 0.17Sliti
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    NEC
    Deveron Fonville: 137 passningar, xT 0.31FonvilleBrayann Pereira: 114 passningar, xT 0.45PereiraJamiro Gregory Monteiro Alvarenga: 91 passningar, xT 0.14AlvarengaDarko Nejašmić: 90 passningar, xT 0.39NejašmićDušan Tadić: 80 passningar, xT 0.71TadićTjaronn Chery: 75 passningar, xT 0.21CheryGonzalo Alejandro Crettaz: 69 passningar, xT 0.13CrettazClement Mutahi Bischoff: 66 passningar, xT 0.7BischoffTobias Storm: 56 passningar, xT 0.13StormIsak Hansen-Aarøen: 49 passningar, xT 0.14Hansen-AarøenNoé Lebreton: 36 passningar, xT -0.1Lebreton
    Excelsior
    Jan Plug: 111 passningar, xT 0.11PlugRick Meissen: 94 passningar, xT 0.05MeissenStijn van Gassel: 84 passningar, xT 0.23GasselLennard Hartjes: 68 passningar, xT -0.12HartjesIrakli Yegoian: 59 passningar, xT 0.62YegoianCasper Ludvig Widell: 55 passningar, xT 0.07WidellSimon Janssen: 53 passningar, xT 0.69JanssenDaniël van Vianen: 45 passningar, xT -0.08VianenNolan Martens: 41 passningar, xT 0.06MartensDavid Garden: 17 passningar, xT -0.12GardenAymen Sliti: 14 passningar, xT 0.17Sliti

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceNECExcelsior
    Points33
    xPoints3.22.9
    xG per match2.61.6
    xGA per match1.11.5
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.690.25
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.370.27
    Playing styleNECExcelsior
    Build-up efficiency0.320.33
    Field tilt0.880.52
    xT per match2.81
    xTA per match0.891.1
    Won balls, offensive half3333
    Pressing intensity0.230.23
    Pressing efficiency0.450.25
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.440.21
    Entries into the box per match369
    Entries into the box against714
    Pass completion %0.810.75
    Pass completion % under pressure0.760.68
    Passes per match504357
    Passes against per match172447
    Switches of play per match20.534.4
    Long balls per match2546
    Set piecesNECExcelsior
    xG from free kicks00
    Corners per match7.54.6
    Corners against per match26.2
    xG per corner0.010.07
    xGA per corner against0.060.01
    First touch, offensive corners %0.470.44
    First touch, defensive corners %0.750.67
    OtherNECExcelsior
    Throw-in control0.90.74
    The goalkeepersGonzalo Alejandro Crettaz (NEC)Stijn van Gassel (Excelsior)
    Saves27
    Save %40%78%
    xG prevented11%64%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins NEC vs Excelsior according to our model?

    The model gives NEC a 63% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: NEC 63%, draw 21%, Excelsior 16%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 2-1 at 10% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 64% and under at 36%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 60% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.