01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Feyenoord to win71%
- Over 1.5 goals88%
EredivisieMAC3PARK Stadion, Zwolle17°8,5 mm18 km/h
Läs på svenskaAnna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
TEXT: 71 percent. That's the probability Feyenoord walks away with a win against PEC Zwolle, a number that decisively shapes the analysis of this encounter. The visitors boast an impressive unbeaten streak stretching across 14 league matches, underscoring their dominance. In contrast, the hosts have yet to register a win against Feyenoord since 2022, a small head-to-head sample that bolsters the visitors' credentials.
With expected goals heavily skewed in favor of Feyenoord—2.67 to Zwolle's 0.99—the projection leans towards a multi-goal victory for the visitors. Their high-scoring form, having found the net in ten consecutive games, contrasts sharply with Zwolle's defensive vulnerabilities. The model suggests a 71% chance of surpassing 2.5 goals, supporting the likelihood of a 0-2 or 1-2 scoreline.
The betting edge can't be ignored. With Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet all offering Feyenoord at 1.45 odds, there's a small but noteworthy 3% value edge based on the model’s assessment. Rain is forecast for the match. Feyenoord's victory seems the most probable outcome, giving investors a sharp angle to consider on the away side.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · PEC Zwolle | X | 2 · Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bet365 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 1.40 |
| Betsafe | 6.27 | 4.51 | EV+ 3% 1.45 |
| Betsson | 6.27 | 4.51 | EV+ 3% 1.45 |
| Nordicbet | 6.27 | 4.51 | EV+ 3% 1.45 |
| Pinnacle | 6.29 | 4.94 | EV+ 1% 1.43 |
Odds updated 11 Sept, 15:38
6.18 → 6.29
4.88 → 4.94
1.44 → 1.43
Pinnacle · 4 recorded price levels · 06/09/2026 → 11/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Eredivisie data since 2022.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | PEC Zwolle | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 4 | 11 |
| xPoints | 5.4 | 9.4 |
| xG per match | 1.1 | 2.4 |
| xGA per match | 2.2 | 0.99 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.27 | 0.22 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.27 | 0.08 |
| Playing style | PEC Zwolle | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.27 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.3 | 0.71 |
| xT per match | 0.69 | 1.7 |
| xTA per match | 1.4 | 0.93 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 24 | 22 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.26 | 0.21 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.28 | 0.3 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.26 | 0.25 |
| Entries into the box per match | 10 | 20 |
| Entries into the box against | 18 | 11 |
| Pass completion % | 0.68 | 0.81 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.62 | 0.77 |
| Passes per match | 243 | 422 |
| Passes against per match | 437 | 324 |
| Switches of play per match | 17 | 18.2 |
| Long balls per match | 28 | 28 |
| Set pieces | PEC Zwolle | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| Corners per match | 3.5 | 6.2 |
| Corners against per match | 8.5 | 3.6 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.5 | 0.29 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.51 | 0.41 |
| Other | PEC Zwolle | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.69 | 0.75 |
| The goalkeepers | Jasper Schendelaar (PEC Zwolle) | Tjark Ernst (Feyenoord) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 24 | 9 |
| Save % | 73% | 56% |
| xG prevented | 51% | 33% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Feyenoord a 71% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: PEC Zwolle 12%, draw 17%, Feyenoord 71%.
The model's most likely final score is 0-2 at 9% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 71% and under at 29%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 59% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.