01 · 2 legs
Safe
- NEC to win62%
- Over 1.5 goals84%
EredivisieMAC3PARK Stadion, Zwolle18°9,9 mm23 km/h
Läs på svenskaOscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
NEC's remarkable streak of scoring in 25 consecutive league matches sets the stage for their clash against PEC Zwolle. The visitors are clear favorites, with a 62% chance to win, according to the model. Crucially, this isn't just statistical noise: Zwolle's defense struggles, conceding an average of two expected goals per match, while NEC generates a robust 2.6 xG per game. This mismatch is evident not only in raw numbers but also in the expected style of play, where NEC's possession and high press are likely to dominate Zwolle’s direct approach.
For Zwolle, the head-to-head record against NEC since 2022 doesn’t inspire confidence either. In the small sample size of four matches, Zwolle has failed to win, managing only one draw and three losses. While these past encounters weigh less than current form and expected goals, they echo the broader narrative of NEC's superiority. NEC's high pressing style and better xG metrics indicate they can control and exploit Zwolle’s weaknesses effectively.
The expected goals suggest a likely 1-2 scoreline, which aligns with the most probable outcomes provided by the model. With over 64% chance of surpassing 2.5 goals, and a 59% probability that both teams will score, the game leans towards being an open affair, albeit with NEC expected to have the upper hand. Zwolle’s low defensive block may find itself overwhelmed by NEC’s relentless pressure and superior attacking metrics.
Bettors should note the value in backing NEC at odds of 1.69 with Betsafe, Betsson, or Nordicbet. The model perceives a 5% edge here, making NEC not just favorites, but a value bet tomorrow night. While no result is ever guaranteed in football, the numbers distinctly favor the visitors, with their scoring streak likely to continue at Zwolle’s expense.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · PEC Zwolle | X | 2 · NEC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 3.64 | 3.81 | EV+ 17% 1.88 |
| Betsson | 3.64 | 3.81 | EV+ 17% 1.88 |
| Nordicbet | 3.64 | 3.81 | EV+ 17% 1.88 |
| Paddy Power | 4.20 | 4.00 | EV+ 0% 1.61 |
| Pinnacle | 3.52 | 4.31 | EV+ 19% 1.91 |
Odds updated 29 Aug, 11:37
Market signal
The market has moved clearly towards a PEC Zwolle win since 23 August — the odds have shortened from 5.25 to 3.52 (−33%).
5.25 → 3.52
4.88 → 4.31
1.50 → 1.91
Pinnacle · 13 recorded price levels · 23/08/2026 → 29/08/2026 · fixed scale 20 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Eredivisie data since 2022.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | PEC Zwolle | NEC |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 3 | 3 |
| xPoints | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| xG per match | 1 | 2.6 |
| xGA per match | 2 | 1.1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.34 | 0.69 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.32 | 0.37 |
| Playing style | PEC Zwolle | NEC |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.27 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.24 | 0.88 |
| xT per match | 0.81 | 2.8 |
| xTA per match | 1.6 | 0.88 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 24 | 33 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.27 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.25 | 0.45 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.22 | 0.44 |
| Entries into the box per match | 10 | 36 |
| Entries into the box against | 21 | 7 |
| Pass completion % | 0.68 | 0.81 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.62 | 0.76 |
| Passes per match | 216 | 503 |
| Passes against per match | 517 | 172 |
| Switches of play per match | 16.1 | 20.5 |
| Long balls per match | 28 | 25 |
| Set pieces | PEC Zwolle | NEC |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0 | 0 |
| Corners per match | 2.6 | 7.5 |
| Corners against per match | 6.9 | 2 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.06 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.5 | 0.47 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.48 | 0.75 |
| Other | PEC Zwolle | NEC |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.7 | 0.9 |
| The goalkeepers | Jasper Schendelaar (PEC Zwolle) | Gonzalo Alejandro Crettaz (NEC) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 17 | 2 |
| Save % | 81% | 40% |
| xG prevented | 77% | 11% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives NEC a 62% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: PEC Zwolle 17%, draw 21%, NEC 62%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-2 at 10% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 64% and under at 36%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 59% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.