01 · 2 legs
Safe
- AZ Alkmaar to win46%
- Over 1.5 goals82%
EredivisieAbe Lenstra Stadion, Heerenveen16°11 km/h
Läs på svenskaSofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
TEXT (corrected):
AZ Alkmaar's impressive xG per match of 2.9 dwarfs Heerenveen's 1.1, underscoring the visitors' offensive threat. With a streak of four consecutive wins and a solid 46% chance of victory according to the model, AZ are justifiably favored. Though the head-to-head record is a small five-game sample, AZ's superior form and playing style give them the edge in this match-up.
Despite Heerenveen's physicality and balanced style, their xGA of 1.8 reveals defensive vulnerabilities, which AZ's high press could exploit. The expected goals point towards a 1.70 to 1.42 edge for AZ, suggesting a closely contested battle with a slight advantage to the visitors. The most likely scoreline of 1-1 at 11% probability reflects this, though the 9% chance of an AZ 1-2 win aligns with the model's lean.
While a high-scoring fixture is anticipated, with the over 2.5 goals at 60%, the significant value lies with the hosts. Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet offer odds of 4.21 for a Heerenveen win, which, with a 29% model probability, presents a notable 22% edge. This betting angle offers a compelling opportunity for those looking at potential upsets.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Heerenveen | X | 2 · AZ Alkmaar |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | EV+ 6% 3.65 | EV+ 1% 4.00 | 1.83 |
| Betsson | EV+ 6% 3.65 | EV+ 1% 4.00 | 1.83 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 6% 3.65 | EV+ 1% 4.00 | 1.83 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 8% 3.72 | EV+ 7% 4.22 | 1.87 |
Odds updated 6 Sept, 11:36
3.89 → 3.72
4.29 → 4.22
1.76 → 1.87
Pinnacle · 15 recorded price levels · 31/08/2026 → 06/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Eredivisie data since 2022.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Heerenveen | AZ Alkmaar |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 5 | 12 |
| xPoints | 3.5 | 9.4 |
| xG per match | 1.1 | 2.9 |
| xGA per match | 1.8 | 0.88 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.1 | 0.67 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| Playing style | Heerenveen | AZ Alkmaar |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.3 | 0.31 |
| Field tilt | 0.48 | 0.82 |
| xT per match | 0.78 | 1.5 |
| xTA per match | 1.8 | 0.57 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 20 | 28 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.19 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.26 | 0.28 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.24 | 0.27 |
| Entries into the box per match | 14 | 21 |
| Entries into the box against | 15 | 7 |
| Pass completion % | 0.81 | 0.8 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.76 | 0.74 |
| Passes per match | 449 | 441 |
| Passes against per match | 371 | 305 |
| Switches of play per match | 27.8 | 20 |
| Long balls per match | 37 | 28 |
| Set pieces | Heerenveen | AZ Alkmaar |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.07 | 0.01 |
| Corners per match | 4.5 | 10.1 |
| Corners against per match | 6.8 | 3.8 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.01 | 0.04 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.61 | 0.47 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.63 | 0.4 |
| Other | Heerenveen | AZ Alkmaar |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.8 | 0.69 |
| The goalkeepers | Bernt Klaverboer (Heerenveen) | Jari De Busser (AZ Alkmaar) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 15 | 6 |
| Save % | 75% | 67% |
| xG prevented | 51% | 22% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives AZ Alkmaar a 46% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Heerenveen 29%, draw 25%, AZ Alkmaar 46%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 60% and under at 40%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 62% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.