01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Middlesbrough or draw (X2)70%
- Under 3.5 goals72%
EFL ChampionshipSt Andrew's, Birmingham14°1,8 mm17 km/h
Läs på svenskaOscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
Middlesbrough's 43% win probability suggests they're rightly favored against Birmingham City, although nuances in the stats add layers to this matchup. Birmingham's two losses in as many head-to-head encounters since 2023 might catch the eye, but the small sample size downplays its significance compared to current form and expected goals. The model leans towards Middlesbrough, underscored by their superior xG per match at 1.9, compared to Birmingham's 1.3, which emphasizes the visitors' attacking prowess.
The expected goals tally paints a clearer picture: Birmingham's 1.18 against Middlesbrough's 1.47 suggests a narrow advantage for the visitors in breaking down defenses. Birmingham's counter-attacking style might find some joy against Boro's high press, yet the hosts' defensive vulnerabilities signalled by an xGA of 1.3 work against their chances. In contrast, Middlesbrough's stronger defensive numbers (xGA 1.1) support their position as favorites.
Despite the expected goals indicating a slight edge for Middlesbrough, the most likely scoreline remains 1-1 at 13%. There's a tight margin between a draw and a Boro win, with a 10% chance for a 0-1 result and 9% for 1-2. This reflects a game that could tip either way depending on execution in the final third and defensive resilience.
Given the over 2.5 goals probability at 49%, the game may not explode into a high-scoring affair. Both teams to score is a more probable 54%, hinting at the potential for a closely contested match.
Expect a gritty contest where Middlesbrough's clinical edge might just eke out a slender victory, potentially settling at a 0-1 or 1-2 scoreline. The value sits with the visitors, especially if their high press can unsettle Birmingham's backline early.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Head-to-head based on Championship data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Birmingham City | Middlesbrough |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 7 | 10 |
| xPoints | 8.5 | 8 |
| xG per match | 1.3 | 1.9 |
| xGA per match | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.13 | 0.31 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.3 | 0.13 |
| Playing style | Birmingham City | Middlesbrough |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.34 | 0.34 |
| Field tilt | 0.57 | 0.62 |
| xT per match | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| xTA per match | 0.99 | 0.75 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 28 | 23 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.34 | 0.32 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.35 | 0.29 |
| Entries into the box per match | 13 | 17 |
| Entries into the box against | 10 | 11 |
| Pass completion % | 0.64 | 0.83 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.61 | 0.78 |
| Passes per match | 255 | 493 |
| Passes against per match | 278 | 309 |
| Switches of play per match | 18.2 | 31 |
| Long balls per match | 28 | 28 |
| Set pieces | Birmingham City | Middlesbrough |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.09 | 0.18 |
| Corners per match | 6.5 | 5.2 |
| Corners against per match | 3.8 | 6 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.01 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.42 | 0.62 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.61 | 0.87 |
| Other | Birmingham City | Middlesbrough |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.73 | 0.75 |
| The goalkeepers | James Beadle (Birmingham City) | Radek Vítek (Middlesbrough) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 18 | 11 |
| Save % | 69% | 69% |
| xG prevented | 39% | 54% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Middlesbrough a 43% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Birmingham City 29%, draw 27%, Middlesbrough 43%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 49% and under at 51%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 54% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.