01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Sheffield United or draw (X2)64%
- Under 3.5 goals77%
EFL ChampionshipEwood Park, Blackburn13°7,8 mm30 km/h
Läs på svenskaOscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
Sheffield United’s slight edge in model probabilities—37% to Blackburn Rovers’ 33%—sets up a tightly contested clash. The most likely scorelines are 1-1 or a narrow 1-0 victory for either side, each at 10-13%. Rovers’ possession-heavy style will test United’s low defensive block and direct approach, but the expected goals (xG) figures, 1.23 for the hosts and 1.20 for the visitors, suggest a balanced encounter.
In terms of form, Sheffield United also has a slender advantage. They have collected 6 points to Blackburn's 5 and boast superior xPoints, 7.1 compared to Rovers’ 3.5. The goals against (xGA) statistics—1.7 for Blackburn versus 1.8 for Sheffield—indicate the home side might slightly edge defensively, yet it’s the visitors' attacking profile of xG 1.2 per match that catches the eye. A small head-to-head sample favors United with 2 wins in 4 matches since 2023, but it’s hardly decisive.
Yet, when dissecting the numbers, the model leans towards Sheffield United with subtle conviction, and a 1-0 away victory feels plausible. While the 44% chance for over 2.5 goals suggests caution, this is a sharp angle to consider for those looking for a calculated punt.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Blackburn Rovers | X | 2 · Sheffield United |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pinnacle | EV+ 4% 3.14 | EV+ 4% 3.44 | 2.25 |
Odds updated 6 Sept, 12:32
3.15 → 3.14
3.41 → 3.44
2.26 → 2.25
1.90 → 1.87
Pinnacle · 2 recorded price levels · 05/09/2026 → 06/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Championship data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Blackburn Rovers | Sheffield United |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 5 | 6 |
| xPoints | 3.5 | 7.1 |
| xG per match | 0.67 | 1.2 |
| xGA per match | 1.7 | 1.8 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.04 | 0.1 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.17 | 0.12 |
| Playing style | Blackburn Rovers | Sheffield United |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.29 | 0.34 |
| Field tilt | 0.45 | 0.37 |
| xT per match | 0.76 | 0.51 |
| xTA per match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 17 | 27 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.26 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.27 | 0.31 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.24 | 0.31 |
| Entries into the box per match | 9 | 10 |
| Entries into the box against | 16 | 13 |
| Pass completion % | 0.76 | 0.64 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.72 | 0.63 |
| Passes per match | 377 | 236 |
| Passes against per match | 369 | 371 |
| Switches of play per match | 38.3 | 14 |
| Long balls per match | 39 | 25 |
| Set pieces | Blackburn Rovers | Sheffield United |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0 | 0.08 |
| Corners per match | 5.6 | 3.9 |
| Corners against per match | 5.2 | 7.3 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.25 | 0.32 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.58 | 0.66 |
| Other | Blackburn Rovers | Sheffield United |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.72 | 0.67 |
| The goalkeepers | Sean Mcloughlin (Blackburn Rovers) | Michael Cooper (Sheffield United) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 9 | 19 |
| Save % | 100% | 73% |
| xG prevented | 100% | 53% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Sheffield United a 37% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Blackburn Rovers 33%, draw 30%, Sheffield United 37%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 44% and under at 56%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 50% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.