01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance West Ham United or draw (X2)62%
- Over 1.5 goals76%
EFL ChampionshipToughsheet Community Stadium, Bolton14°6,3 mm28 km/h
Läs på svenskaErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
Bolton Wanderers have stumbled into a rough patch, losing their last three matches in the Championship. Meanwhile, West Ham United's recent form shows they're capitalizing on their balanced style, with a notable 8 points gathered compared to Bolton's 4. The model leans slightly towards West Ham, reflecting their superior xG stats. The visitors average 2.1 xG per match, double that of the hosts, and concede significantly less, with an xGA of 1.1 compared to Bolton's leaky 1.7. This suggests a potential for West Ham to exploit Bolton's defensive vulnerabilities.
The most likely scoreline, 1-1 at 12%, reflects a close contest, yet the slight edge to West Ham at 39% probability indicates their upper hand. Bolton's possession control might see them hold the ball more, but converting that into goals against a physical West Ham side is the challenge. With expected goals nearly neck and neck, 1.40 for Bolton and 1.34 for West Ham, it's a finely balanced matchup.
Weather conditions, with rain expected, might suppress some of the attacking flair, but the model still leans slightly towards over 2.5 goals at 52%. Both sides are expected to find the net, indicated by the 56% likelihood of both teams scoring. The defensive solidity of West Ham, combined with Bolton's struggles in recent games, suggest that the clash could be tight, possibly ending in a draw or a narrow West Ham victory.
However, the standout betting angle here is the value on Bolton at odds of 4.9 with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet. Despite West Ham's edge, the model's 36% probability for a Bolton win translates into a 77% expected value edge at those odds. For those who appreciate value, this presents a compelling opportunity despite the cautious indication towards a West Ham advantage.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Bolton Wanderers | X | 2 · West Ham United |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | EV+ 77% 4.90 | EV+ 0% 4.05 | 1.65 |
| Betsson | EV+ 77% 4.90 | EV+ 0% 4.05 | 1.65 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 77% 4.90 | EV+ 0% 4.05 | 1.65 |
| Paddy Power | EV+ 63% 4.50 | 4.00 | 1.67 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 76% 4.88 | EV+ 3% 4.16 | 1.63 |
Odds updated 7 Sept, 03:35
4.99 → 4.88
4.06 → 4.16
1.60 → 1.63
Pinnacle · 3 recorded price levels · 06/09/2026 → 06/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Bolton Wanderers | West Ham United |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 4 | 8 |
| xPoints | 4.8 | 8.5 |
| xG per match | 1.1 | 2.1 |
| xGA per match | 1.7 | 1.1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.14 | 0.24 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.32 | 0.1 |
| Playing style | Bolton Wanderers | West Ham United |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.34 | 0.27 |
| Field tilt | 0.56 | 0.63 |
| xT per match | 0.88 | 1 |
| xTA per match | 1.2 | 0.92 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 23 | 24 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.33 | 0.32 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.28 | 0.27 |
| Entries into the box per match | 12 | 17 |
| Entries into the box against | 15 | 11 |
| Pass completion % | 0.73 | 0.82 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.7 | 0.77 |
| Passes per match | 361 | 449 |
| Passes against per match | 283 | 304 |
| Switches of play per match | 36.4 | 34.6 |
| Long balls per match | 38 | 33 |
| Set pieces | Bolton Wanderers | West Ham United |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.03 | 0.27 |
| Corners per match | 7.1 | 7.1 |
| Corners against per match | 4.3 | 5.1 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.07 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.37 | 0.43 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.76 | 0.72 |
| Other | Bolton Wanderers | West Ham United |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.77 | 0.68 |
| The goalkeepers | Jack Elliott Bonham (Bolton Wanderers) | Mads Hermansen (West Ham United) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 15 | 11 |
| Save % | 63% | 73% |
| xG prevented | 44% | 42% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives West Ham United a 39% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Bolton Wanderers 36%, draw 25%, West Ham United 39%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 52% and under at 48%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 56% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.