01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Lincoln City to win52%
- Under 3.5 goals73%
EFL ChampionshipAshton Gate, Bristol16°3,9 mm22 km/h
Läs på svenskaSofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
TEXT (corrected):
Lincoln City may only have five points this season, but their underlying numbers tell a different story. With an impressive xG per match of 1.8, the visitors boast a significant edge in creating opportunities, nearly doubling their hosts' average of 0.94. This attacking efficiency is likely to play a crucial role, especially against a Bristol City side that has struggled defensively. The hosts' xGA per match matches Lincoln's at 1.4, yet when it comes to delivering on the attack, the home side lags considerably.
Despite Bristol City's recent streak of three consecutive wins, their xPoints tally of 6.2 suggests they might have been riding their luck. In contrast, Lincoln's xPoints of 9.3 reflects a team performing below its potential in terms of actual points. The rain forecast of 2.9 mm could dampen the match's tempo and goal-scoring opportunities—something already accounted for in the model's numbers. Nonetheless, with both teams deploying a low defence and direct style, the game could still see quick transitions and counter-attacks, especially from Lincoln.
The model heavily favors Lincoln City with a 52% probability of victory, compared to Bristol City's 25%. Despite the home team's current form, the visitors' statistical superiority in expected goals and points suggests they are due for a positive result. The most likely scorelines reflect this, with a 1-1 draw at 13% and a 0-1 win for Lincoln at 11%. The potential for both teams to score is also notable at 53%, but the over 2.5 goals sits just below even probability at 48%, hinting at a tighter affair.
With an edge in expected metrics and the statistical backing to upset the recent form narrative, Lincoln City looks poised to claim a narrow victory, possibly a 0-1 or 1-2 outcome.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Bristol City | Lincoln City |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 10 | 5 |
| xPoints | 6.2 | 9.3 |
| xG per match | 0.94 | 1.8 |
| xGA per match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.22 | 0.18 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.26 | 0.2 |
| Playing style | Bristol City | Lincoln City |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.3 | 0.36 |
| Field tilt | 0.32 | 0.27 |
| xT per match | 0.68 | 1.1 |
| xTA per match | 1.3 | 0.98 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 21 | 33 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.31 | 0.26 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.27 | 0.25 |
| Entries into the box per match | 9 | 18 |
| Entries into the box against | 13 | 16 |
| Pass completion % | 0.66 | 0.63 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.61 | 0.6 |
| Passes per match | 241 | 194 |
| Passes against per match | 364 | 443 |
| Switches of play per match | 15.8 | 20.7 |
| Long balls per match | 24 | 33 |
| Set pieces | Bristol City | Lincoln City |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.09 | 0.18 |
| Corners per match | 4.3 | 4.8 |
| Corners against per match | 6.5 | 7 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.23 | 0.25 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.73 | 0.49 |
| Other | Bristol City | Lincoln City |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.68 | 0.72 |
| The goalkeepers | Rob Dickie (Bristol City) | George Wickens (Lincoln City) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 8 | 20 |
| Save % | 100% | 77% |
| xG prevented | 100% | 56% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Lincoln City a 52% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Bristol City 25%, draw 23%, Lincoln City 52%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 48% and under at 52%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 53% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.