01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Burnley to win50%
- Over 1.5 goals77%
EFL ChampionshipTurf Moor, Burnley11°9,2 mm24 km/h
Läs på svenskaSofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
Two head-to-head draws since 2023 can't outweigh the current form and underlying numbers for Burnley and Derby County. The hosts have shown offensive consistency, scoring in 11 consecutive league matches, which complements their balanced and physical playing style. In contrast, the visitors lean on a low defensive setup with a direct approach, yet they haven't managed to keep things tighter at the back, as reflected in their higher expected goals against (xGA) per match.
Despite Derby County's slight edge in points, Burnley leads the expected points race with 6.7 to the Rams' 5.8, suggesting their performances have deserved more than the table shows. The expected goals (xG) metrics bolster this view, with Burnley posting 1.62 expected goals compared to Derby's 1.14. This indicates more scoring opportunities for Burnley, who also benefit from a model probability favoring them at 50% over Derby's 25%.
Weather conditions with 2.4 mm of rain are likely to dampen the scoring probability slightly, but the model already accounts for this. Hence, the over 2.5 goals probability stands at 52%, while both teams to score is pegged at 55%. Given these numbers, a narrow win for Burnley appears more likely, with the 1-0 or 2-1 scorelines standing out.
For those assessing the betting angles, the value appears to rest with Burnley. A 1-0 scoreline sits at 10% likelihood, and the bookmakers' odds might not fully incorporate Burnley's underlying strengths. Keep an eye on these odds, as a slight deviation from market expectations could present an opportunity for a calculated wager.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Head-to-head based on Championship data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Burnley | Derby County |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 3 | 4 |
| xPoints | 6.7 | 5.8 |
| xG per match | 1.1 | 1 |
| xGA per match | 1.6 | 2 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.08 | 0.2 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.35 | 0.2 |
| Playing style | Burnley | Derby County |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Field tilt | 0.44 | 0.54 |
| xT per match | 0.9 | 0.93 |
| xTA per match | 1.1 | 0.95 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 14 | 25 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.23 | 0.29 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.2 | 0.28 |
| Entries into the box per match | 10 | 12 |
| Entries into the box against | 13 | 12 |
| Pass completion % | 0.78 | 0.73 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.74 | 0.7 |
| Passes per match | 389 | 322 |
| Passes against per match | 399 | 358 |
| Switches of play per match | 35.3 | 20.3 |
| Long balls per match | 33 | 31 |
| Set pieces | Burnley | Derby County |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0 | 0.01 |
| Corners per match | 4.8 | 5.7 |
| Corners against per match | 4.2 | 6.1 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.05 | 0.07 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.34 | 0.31 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.68 | 0.51 |
| Other | Burnley | Derby County |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.73 | 0.68 |
| The goalkeepers | Max Weiß (Burnley) | Jacob Widell Zetterstrom (Derby County) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 13 | 22 |
| Save % | 50% | 67% |
| xG prevented | 36% | 42% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Burnley a 50% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Burnley 50%, draw 25%, Derby County 25%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 52% and under at 48%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 55% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.