EFL ChampionshipThe Valley, London17°18 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Charlton AthleticCharlton AthleticLow block & direct
    vs
    Queens Park RangersQueens Park RangersCounter-attacks & crosses
    The model's lean: 1 · Charlton Athletic (36%)Soft draw

    Charlton AthleticQueens Park Rangers · EFL Championship

    1 · Charlton Athletic 36%X 29%35% Queens Park Rangers · 2

    Analysis: Charlton AthleticQueens Park Rangers

    Anna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work

    TEXT holds mostly, but the specific betting odds ("Bet365 with odds at 2.85 to win") are not supported by the given facts and constitute an unsupported claim. Corrected:

    Two encounters since 2023 paint a narrow picture, with Queens Park Rangers holding a slight edge with one win and a draw, but this small sample doesn’t outweigh recent form and underlying metrics. The numbers suggest a more nuanced story. Charlton Athletic’s attack has been consistent, finding the net in 11 consecutive league games. Yet, the visitors’ superior xG and defensive metrics — significantly lower xGA at 0.88 compared to Charlton's 1.3 — point to a possible upper hand for QPR.

    In terms of expected goals, both sides are almost neck-and-neck, with Charlton at 1.18 and QPR at 1.23. This balance reflects the bookies' odds, with Charlton at a slight 36% edge to win against QPR’s 35%. However, Queens Park Rangers' counter-attacking and crossing prowess might exploit Charlton's low defensive setup, especially given the latter’s slightly leaky defense. The expected goals within eight seconds of winning the ball clearly favor QPR, underscoring their threat in fast breaks.

    The model leans towards a low-scoring affair, with only a 43% chance of over 2.5 goals and a 49% probability for both teams to score. The 1-1 draw emerges as the most likely scoreline at 13%, followed closely by 0-1 and 1-0. Given these probabilities, a restrained approach to goals seems prudent, aligning with Charlton's direct play and QPR's strategic counter-attacks.

    For those eyeing a betting opportunity, Queens Park Rangers appear to hold value based on their stronger xPoints (8.6 vs 5.9) and sharper xG metrics, despite the model’s slight overall lean toward Charlton Athletic. While Charlton's form suggests resilience, QPR’s tactical edge may tilt the balance in their favor, making them an intriguing prospect for punters looking for an edge.

    Charlton AthleticCharlton Athletic
    Form LWWWD
    League ranking xG #22xGA #11xT #23xP/match #12Points #2
    Key players
    • Karlan Laughton Ahearne-GrantFxG 0.16 · xT 0.16
    • Tyreece Anthony Tupac Shakur CampbellLWxG 0.14 · xT 0.07
    • Miles Lester LeaburnFxG 0.24 · xT 0.03
    Queens Park RangersQueens Park Rangers
    Form LWDWW
    League ranking xG #1xGA #2xT #3xP/match #1Points #3
    Key players
    • Rumarn Kameron-Scott BurrellFxG 0.36 · xT 0.09
    • Alfie LloydFxG 0.65 · xT 0.01
    • Richard KoneFxG 0.79 · xT 0.00

    Match prediction: Charlton AthleticQueens Park Rangers

    Predicted score matrix

    Queens Park Rangers
    Charlton Athletic
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–09.4%
    0–110.7%
    0–26.8%
    0–32.8%
    0–4+1.1%
    1
    1–010.2%
    1–113.4%
    1–28.0%
    1–33.3%
    1–4+1.3%
    2
    2–06.2%
    2–17.7%
    2–24.7%
    2–31.9%
    2–4+0.8%
    3
    3–02.4%
    3–13.0%
    3–21.9%
    3–30.8%
    3–4+0.3%
    4+
    4+–00.9%
    4+–11.1%
    4+–20.7%
    4+–30.3%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-113%
    2. 2.0-111%
    3. 3.1-010%
    4. 4.0-09%
    5. 5.1-28%
    Expected goals
    1,181,23
    Both teams to score
    49%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,4
    Under 2,557%
    @1.88EV+6%
    Over 2,543%
    @1.94

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Charlton Athletic or draw (1X)63%
    • Under 3.5 goals78%

    Combined probability

    49%

    Fair odds

    2.03

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Charlton Athletic or draw (1X)63%
    • Under 2.5 goals57%
    • Greg Alexander Docherty to score26%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score49%
    • Over 2.5 goals43%
    • Richard Kone to score27%
    • Jonathan Raymond François Varane to be booked23%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 1 · Charlton Athletic36% probability@3.28PinnacleEV+17%reference odds
    • Under 2.557% probability@1.88PinnacleEV+6%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Charlton AthleticX2 · Queens Park Rangers
    Pinnacle
    EV+ 17%
    3.28
    3.372.21

    Odds updated 7 Sept, 16:32

    Odds movement

    1+3 %
    32 %27 %

    3.173.28

    X+1 %
    31 %26 %

    3.343.37

    2-3 %
    45 %40 %

    2.282.21

    Over 2,50 %
    52 %47 %

    1.941.94

    Pinnacle · 2 recorded price levels · 06/09/2026 → 07/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    2 matches
    Charlton Athletic 0Draw 1Queens Park Rangers 1
    Goals: 13 (⌀ 2)

    Head-to-head based on Championship data since 2023.

    Key facts

    • Charlton Athletic have scored in 11 consecutive league matches.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Charlton Athletic
    Queens Park Rangers
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Charlton Athletic (63)
    Queens Park Rangers (73)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Charlton Athletic
    Conor James Coventry: 149 passningar, xT 0.26CoventryLloyd Richard Jones: 119 passningar, xT 0.07JonesAmarii Bell: 115 passningar, xT 0.06BellDanny John McNamara: 99 passningar, xT 0.36McNamaraKarlan Laughton Ahearne-Grant: 75 passningar, xT 0.52Ahearne-GrantArthur Chukwuezugo Okonkwo: 68 passningar, xT 0.12OkonkwoSonny Jack Carey: 58 passningar, xT -0.08CareyNathaniel Nyakie Chalobah: 56 passningar, xT -0.03ChalobahTyreece Anthony Tupac Shakur Campbell: 49 passningar, xT 0.23CampbellBilly Dawson Koumetio: 44 passningar, xT 0.01KoumetioTyler Grant Bindon: 34 passningar, xT 0.01Bindon
    Queens Park Rangers
    Jimmy Dunne: 184 passningar, xT -0.13DunnePierce Joseph Charles: 165 passningar, xT 0.25CharlesJake Clarke Salter: 156 passningar, xT 0.06SalterRonnie Edwards: 115 passningar, xT 0.44EdwardsIlias Chair: 101 passningar, xT 0.6ChairAmadou Salif Mbengue: 89 passningar, xT 0.31MbengueGlen Adjei Kamara: 87 passningar, xT 0.1KamaraHarvey Vale: 77 passningar, xT 0.5ValeTariq Kwame Nii-Lante Lamptey: 59 passningar, xT 0.61LampteyKealey Otieno Adamson: 58 passningar, xT 0.31AdamsonNicolas Madsen: 56 passningar, xT -0.01Madsen
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Charlton Athletic
    Conor James Coventry: 149 passningar, xT 0.26CoventryLloyd Richard Jones: 119 passningar, xT 0.07JonesAmarii Bell: 115 passningar, xT 0.06BellDanny John McNamara: 99 passningar, xT 0.36McNamaraKarlan Laughton Ahearne-Grant: 75 passningar, xT 0.52Ahearne-GrantArthur Chukwuezugo Okonkwo: 68 passningar, xT 0.12OkonkwoSonny Jack Carey: 58 passningar, xT -0.08CareyNathaniel Nyakie Chalobah: 56 passningar, xT -0.03ChalobahTyreece Anthony Tupac Shakur Campbell: 49 passningar, xT 0.23CampbellBilly Dawson Koumetio: 44 passningar, xT 0.01KoumetioTyler Grant Bindon: 34 passningar, xT 0.01Bindon
    Queens Park Rangers
    Jimmy Dunne: 184 passningar, xT -0.13DunnePierce Joseph Charles: 165 passningar, xT 0.25CharlesJake Clarke Salter: 156 passningar, xT 0.06SalterRonnie Edwards: 115 passningar, xT 0.44EdwardsIlias Chair: 101 passningar, xT 0.6ChairAmadou Salif Mbengue: 89 passningar, xT 0.31MbengueGlen Adjei Kamara: 87 passningar, xT 0.1KamaraHarvey Vale: 77 passningar, xT 0.5ValeTariq Kwame Nii-Lante Lamptey: 59 passningar, xT 0.61LampteyKealey Otieno Adamson: 58 passningar, xT 0.31AdamsonNicolas Madsen: 56 passningar, xT -0.01Madsen

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceCharlton AthleticQueens Park Rangers
    Points1010
    xPoints5.98.6
    xG per match0.942
    xGA per match1.30.88
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.10.33
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.190.05
    Playing styleCharlton AthleticQueens Park Rangers
    Build-up efficiency0.330.3
    Field tilt0.270.48
    xT per match0.571.3
    xTA per match1.31.2
    Won balls, offensive half2224
    Pressing intensity0.260.24
    Pressing efficiency0.240.26
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.230.21
    Entries into the box per match815
    Entries into the box against1711
    Pass completion %0.70.75
    Pass completion % under pressure0.650.71
    Passes per match252334
    Passes against per match472416
    Switches of play per match17.423.2
    Long balls per match2330
    Set piecesCharlton AthleticQueens Park Rangers
    xG from free kicks0.080.07
    Corners per match4.84.5
    Corners against per match5.83.7
    xG per corner0.040.05
    xGA per corner against0.030.02
    First touch, offensive corners %0.370.44
    First touch, defensive corners %0.480.87
    OtherCharlton AthleticQueens Park Rangers
    Throw-in control0.80.69
    The goalkeepersArthur Chukwuezugo Okonkwo (Charlton Athletic)Pierce Joseph Charles (Queens Park Rangers)
    Saves129
    Save %86%75%
    xG prevented74%86%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Charlton Athletic vs Queens Park Rangers according to our model?

    The model gives Charlton Athletic a 36% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Charlton Athletic 36%, draw 29%, Queens Park Rangers 35%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 43% and under at 57%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 49% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.