01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Charlton Athletic or draw (1X)63%
- Under 3.5 goals78%
EFL ChampionshipThe Valley, London17°18 km/h
Läs på svenskaAnna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
TEXT holds mostly, but the specific betting odds ("Bet365 with odds at 2.85 to win") are not supported by the given facts and constitute an unsupported claim. Corrected:
Two encounters since 2023 paint a narrow picture, with Queens Park Rangers holding a slight edge with one win and a draw, but this small sample doesn’t outweigh recent form and underlying metrics. The numbers suggest a more nuanced story. Charlton Athletic’s attack has been consistent, finding the net in 11 consecutive league games. Yet, the visitors’ superior xG and defensive metrics — significantly lower xGA at 0.88 compared to Charlton's 1.3 — point to a possible upper hand for QPR.
In terms of expected goals, both sides are almost neck-and-neck, with Charlton at 1.18 and QPR at 1.23. This balance reflects the bookies' odds, with Charlton at a slight 36% edge to win against QPR’s 35%. However, Queens Park Rangers' counter-attacking and crossing prowess might exploit Charlton's low defensive setup, especially given the latter’s slightly leaky defense. The expected goals within eight seconds of winning the ball clearly favor QPR, underscoring their threat in fast breaks.
The model leans towards a low-scoring affair, with only a 43% chance of over 2.5 goals and a 49% probability for both teams to score. The 1-1 draw emerges as the most likely scoreline at 13%, followed closely by 0-1 and 1-0. Given these probabilities, a restrained approach to goals seems prudent, aligning with Charlton's direct play and QPR's strategic counter-attacks.
For those eyeing a betting opportunity, Queens Park Rangers appear to hold value based on their stronger xPoints (8.6 vs 5.9) and sharper xG metrics, despite the model’s slight overall lean toward Charlton Athletic. While Charlton's form suggests resilience, QPR’s tactical edge may tilt the balance in their favor, making them an intriguing prospect for punters looking for an edge.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Charlton Athletic | X | 2 · Queens Park Rangers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pinnacle | EV+ 17% 3.28 | 3.37 | 2.21 |
Odds updated 7 Sept, 16:32
3.17 → 3.28
3.34 → 3.37
2.28 → 2.21
1.94 → 1.94
Pinnacle · 2 recorded price levels · 06/09/2026 → 07/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Championship data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Charlton Athletic | Queens Park Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 10 | 10 |
| xPoints | 5.9 | 8.6 |
| xG per match | 0.94 | 2 |
| xGA per match | 1.3 | 0.88 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.1 | 0.33 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.19 | 0.05 |
| Playing style | Charlton Athletic | Queens Park Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.33 | 0.3 |
| Field tilt | 0.27 | 0.48 |
| xT per match | 0.57 | 1.3 |
| xTA per match | 1.3 | 1.2 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 22 | 24 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.26 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.24 | 0.26 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.23 | 0.21 |
| Entries into the box per match | 8 | 15 |
| Entries into the box against | 17 | 11 |
| Pass completion % | 0.7 | 0.75 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.65 | 0.71 |
| Passes per match | 252 | 334 |
| Passes against per match | 472 | 416 |
| Switches of play per match | 17.4 | 23.2 |
| Long balls per match | 23 | 30 |
| Set pieces | Charlton Athletic | Queens Park Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.08 | 0.07 |
| Corners per match | 4.8 | 4.5 |
| Corners against per match | 5.8 | 3.7 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.05 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.37 | 0.44 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.48 | 0.87 |
| Other | Charlton Athletic | Queens Park Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.8 | 0.69 |
| The goalkeepers | Arthur Chukwuezugo Okonkwo (Charlton Athletic) | Pierce Joseph Charles (Queens Park Rangers) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 12 | 9 |
| Save % | 86% | 75% |
| xG prevented | 74% | 86% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Charlton Athletic a 36% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Charlton Athletic 36%, draw 29%, Queens Park Rangers 35%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 43% and under at 57%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 49% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.