01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Lincoln City to win46%
- Under 3.5 goals76%
EFL ChampionshipSincil Bank, Lincoln14°0,8 mm21 km/h
Läs på svenskaAnna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
TEXT: A striking contrast in styles sets the stage for Lincoln City's clash with Swansea City. The hosts' direct approach faces off against the visitors' preference for possession control. With a 46% probability favoring Lincoln City, the model suggests that the home side might have the upper hand. Yet, despite Swansea's superior points tally (11 to Lincoln's 5), the expected points offer a different narrative, with Lincoln slightly edging Swansea 9.3 to 8.7. This discrepancy between actual points and xPoints reveals that Lincoln's performances may have been stronger than their results suggest.
It's a match that could hinge on small margins. With expected goals narrowly favoring Lincoln (1.31 to 1.17), and Swansea boasting a marginally better defensive record in terms of expected goals against (1.1 vs. 1.4), the contest could be decided by whichever team is more clinical in front of goal. The most likely scoreline, according to the model, is a 1-1 draw at 13%, with a 1-0 home victory not far behind at 11%. These numbers imply a tight game, where a single moment of inspiration or error could tilt the balance.
The over/under goal expectation leans slightly under 2.5 goals at 45%, with both teams to score sitting at 51%. Considering the styles and the expected tightness, it might be prudent to anticipate a game with limited scoring opportunities, particularly as Lincoln will look to stifle Swansea's possession game with their directness. Current form and underlying metrics point to a closely contested affair.
As the numbers suggest a tight, possibly low-scoring encounter, a 1-0 win for Lincoln City seems the most plausible outcome.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Lincoln City | Swansea City |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 5 | 11 |
| xPoints | 9.3 | 8.7 |
| xG per match | 1.8 | 1.7 |
| xGA per match | 1.4 | 1.1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.18 | 0.25 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.2 | 0.14 |
| Playing style | Lincoln City | Swansea City |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.37 | 0.27 |
| Field tilt | 0.27 | 0.63 |
| xT per match | 1.1 | 0.95 |
| xTA per match | 0.98 | 0.76 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 32 | 30 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.21 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.26 | 0.36 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.25 | 0.34 |
| Entries into the box per match | 18 | 13 |
| Entries into the box against | 16 | 12 |
| Pass completion % | 0.63 | 0.78 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.6 | 0.73 |
| Passes per match | 194 | 446 |
| Passes against per match | 443 | 282 |
| Switches of play per match | 20.6 | 26.9 |
| Long balls per match | 33 | 32 |
| Set pieces | Lincoln City | Swansea City |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.18 | 0.02 |
| Corners per match | 4.8 | 5 |
| Corners against per match | 7 | 4.3 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.05 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.25 | 0.57 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.49 | 0.58 |
| Other | Lincoln City | Swansea City |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.72 | 0.72 |
| The goalkeepers | George Wickens (Lincoln City) | Lawrence Vigouroux (Swansea City) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 20 | 11 |
| Save % | 77% | 73% |
| xG prevented | 56% | 77% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Lincoln City a 46% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Lincoln City 46%, draw 27%, Swansea City 27%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 45% and under at 55%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 51% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.