01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Middlesbrough to win51%
- Over 1.5 goals76%
EFL ChampionshipLoftus Road, London18°14 km/h
Läs på svenskaOscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
Queens Park Rangers have ridden a wave of defensive solidity, conceding just 0.88 expected goals against per match this season. Their knack for soaking up pressure and countering effectively contrasts sharply with Middlesbrough's high-pressing, possession-based approach. Despite the hosts' strength in these metrics, they face a troubling head-to-head record: four consecutive losses to Middlesbrough since 2023. However, the small sample size of these encounters suggests current form and expected goals might hold more weight in predicting this clash.
The market heavily leans towards the visitors, with Middlesbrough holding a 51% probability of victory according to the model. This suggests confidence in their ability to control the game and create chances. Yet, while Middlesbrough are tipped as favorites, Queens Park Rangers' higher xPoints and xG per match indicate that they might be underestimated. The hosts' counter-attacking and crossing prowess could exploit Middlesbrough's potentially overcommitting press.
Despite the visitors' market favor, the most likely scorelines of 1-1 and 0-1 hint at a closer contest than some might expect. The expected goals are also suggestive of a competitive encounter, with both teams to score pegged at 53%. Given QPR's defensive stats, there's a decent chance they can keep the match tight and grind out a result, even if not a win.
For punters seeking value, Queens Park Rangers' underdog status at odds of 4.50 with Bet365 offers a potential edge. While the model leans towards Middlesbrough, the underlying numbers argue for a closer match. Predict a narrow 1-1 draw, with a slight lean towards over 2.5 goals based on the attacking profiles and expected goals forecast.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Queens Park Rangers | X | 2 · Middlesbrough |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bet365 | 3.40 | 3.30 | EV+ 4% 2.05 |
| Betfair Exchange | 3.35 | 3.50 | EV+ 13% 2.24 |
| Pinnacle | 3.17 | 3.72 | EV+ 11% 2.20 |
Odds updated 5 Sept, 10:32
3.20 → 3.17
3.59 → 3.72
2.16 → 2.20
Pinnacle · 12 recorded price levels · 03/09/2026 → 05/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Championship data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Queens Park Rangers | Middlesbrough |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 10 | 7 |
| xPoints | 8.6 | 6.2 |
| xG per match | 2 | 1.9 |
| xGA per match | 0.88 | 1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.33 | 0.3 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| Playing style | Queens Park Rangers | Middlesbrough |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.3 | 0.34 |
| Field tilt | 0.48 | 0.67 |
| xT per match | 1.3 | 1.4 |
| xTA per match | 1.2 | 0.65 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 24 | 26 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.26 | 0.31 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.21 | 0.29 |
| Entries into the box per match | 15 | 19 |
| Entries into the box against | 11 | 10 |
| Pass completion % | 0.75 | 0.83 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.71 | 0.79 |
| Passes per match | 334 | 524 |
| Passes against per match | 416 | 290 |
| Switches of play per match | 23.2 | 30.5 |
| Long balls per match | 30 | 25 |
| Set pieces | Queens Park Rangers | Middlesbrough |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.07 | 0.22 |
| Corners per match | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Corners against per match | 3.7 | 4.5 |
| xG per corner | 0.05 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.44 | 0.65 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.87 | 0.89 |
| Other | Queens Park Rangers | Middlesbrough |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.69 | 0.75 |
| The goalkeepers | Pierce Joseph Charles (Queens Park Rangers) | Radek Vítek (Middlesbrough) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 9 | 6 |
| Save % | 75% | 55% |
| xG prevented | 86% | 43% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Middlesbrough a 51% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Queens Park Rangers 25%, draw 25%, Middlesbrough 51%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 51% and under at 49%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 53% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.