EFL ChampionshipLoftus Road, London18°14 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Queens Park RangersQueens Park RangersCounter-attacks & crosses
    01
    MiddlesbroughMiddlesbroughPossession & high press
    The model's lean: 2 · Middlesbrough (51%)

    Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough · EFL Championship

    1 · Queens Park Rangers 25%X 25%51% Middlesbrough · 2

    Analysis: Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough

    Oscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work

    Queens Park Rangers have ridden a wave of defensive solidity, conceding just 0.88 expected goals against per match this season. Their knack for soaking up pressure and countering effectively contrasts sharply with Middlesbrough's high-pressing, possession-based approach. Despite the hosts' strength in these metrics, they face a troubling head-to-head record: four consecutive losses to Middlesbrough since 2023. However, the small sample size of these encounters suggests current form and expected goals might hold more weight in predicting this clash.

    The market heavily leans towards the visitors, with Middlesbrough holding a 51% probability of victory according to the model. This suggests confidence in their ability to control the game and create chances. Yet, while Middlesbrough are tipped as favorites, Queens Park Rangers' higher xPoints and xG per match indicate that they might be underestimated. The hosts' counter-attacking and crossing prowess could exploit Middlesbrough's potentially overcommitting press.

    Despite the visitors' market favor, the most likely scorelines of 1-1 and 0-1 hint at a closer contest than some might expect. The expected goals are also suggestive of a competitive encounter, with both teams to score pegged at 53%. Given QPR's defensive stats, there's a decent chance they can keep the match tight and grind out a result, even if not a win.

    For punters seeking value, Queens Park Rangers' underdog status at odds of 4.50 with Bet365 offers a potential edge. While the model leans towards Middlesbrough, the underlying numbers argue for a closer match. Predict a narrow 1-1 draw, with a slight lean towards over 2.5 goals based on the attacking profiles and expected goals forecast.

    Queens Park RangersQueens Park Rangers
    Form LWDWW
    League ranking xG #1xGA #2xT #3xP/match #1Points #3
    Key players
    • Rumarn Kameron-Scott BurrellFxG 0.36 · xT 0.09
    • Alfie LloydFxG 0.65 · xT 0.01
    • Richard KoneFxG 0.79 · xT 0.00
    MiddlesbroughMiddlesbrough
    Form DWLWD
    League ranking xG #5xGA #4xT #2xP/match #10Points #6
    Key players
    • Callum BrittainRWBxG 0.05 · xT 0.15
    • William LankshearFxG 0.82 · xT 0.07
    • Luke AylingCBxG 0.08 · xT 0.28
    Final score
    01
    The model called the outcome
    Predicted probabilities: Queens Park Rangers 25% · Draw 25% · Middlesbrough 51%

    Match prediction: Queens Park RangersMiddlesbrough

    Predicted score matrix

    Middlesbrough
    Queens Park Rangers
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–07.0%
    0–110.8%
    0–29.3%
    0–35.1%
    0–4+3.1%
    1
    1–06.6%
    1–111.9%
    1–29.6%
    1–35.4%
    1–4+3.2%
    2
    2–03.6%
    2–16.0%
    2–25.0%
    2–32.8%
    2–4+1.7%
    3
    3–01.3%
    3–12.1%
    3–21.7%
    3–31.0%
    3–4+0.6%
    4+
    4+–00.4%
    4+–10.7%
    4+–20.6%
    4+–30.3%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-112%
    2. 2.0-111%
    3. 3.1-210%
    4. 4.0-29%
    5. 5.0-07%
    Expected goals
    1,041,67
    Both teams to score
    53%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,7
    Under 2,549%
    @2.20EV+8%
    Over 2,551%
    @1.91

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Middlesbrough to win51%
    • Over 1.5 goals76%

    Combined probability

    41%

    Fair odds

    2.45

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Middlesbrough to win51%
    • Over 2.5 goals51%
    • Tommy Daniel John Conway to score26%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score53%
    • Over 2.5 goals51%
    • Tommy Daniel John Conway to score26%
    • Jonathan Raymond François Varane to be booked22%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 2 · Middlesbrough51% probability@2.24Betfair ExchangeEV+13%reference odds
    • 2 · Middlesbrough51% probability@2.20PinnacleEV+11%reference odds
    • Under 2.549% probability@2.20PinnacleEV+8%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Queens Park RangersX2 · Middlesbrough
    Bet3653.403.30
    EV+ 4%
    2.05
    Betfair Exchange3.353.50
    EV+ 13%
    2.24
    Pinnacle3.173.72
    EV+ 11%
    2.20

    Odds updated 5 Sept, 10:32

    Odds movement

    1-1 %
    33 %28 %

    3.203.17

    X+4 %
    29 %24 %

    3.593.72

    2+2 %
    46 %41 %

    2.162.20

    Pinnacle · 12 recorded price levels · 03/09/2026 → 05/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    4 matches
    Queens Park Rangers 0Draw 0Middlesbrough 4
    Goals: 313 (⌀ 4)

    Head-to-head based on Championship data since 2023.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Queens Park Rangers
    Middlesbrough
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Queens Park Rangers (73)
    Middlesbrough (75)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Queens Park Rangers
    Jimmy Dunne: 184 passningar, xT -0.13DunnePierce Joseph Charles: 165 passningar, xT 0.25CharlesJake Clarke Salter: 156 passningar, xT 0.06SalterRonnie Edwards: 115 passningar, xT 0.44EdwardsIlias Chair: 101 passningar, xT 0.6ChairAmadou Salif Mbengue: 89 passningar, xT 0.31MbengueGlen Adjei Kamara: 87 passningar, xT 0.1KamaraHarvey Vale: 77 passningar, xT 0.5ValeTariq Kwame Nii-Lante Lamptey: 59 passningar, xT 0.61LampteyKealey Otieno Adamson: 58 passningar, xT 0.31AdamsonNicolas Madsen: 56 passningar, xT -0.01Madsen
    Middlesbrough
    Luke Ayling: 298 passningar, xT 1.09AylingAdilson Malanda: 292 passningar, xT 0.52MalandaAidan Morris: 253 passningar, xT 0.1MorrisCallum Brittain: 191 passningar, xT 0.5BrittainNeto Borges: 171 passningar, xT 0.35BorgesSebastian Matthew Berhalter: 166 passningar, xT 0.53BerhalterMorgan Whittaker: 90 passningar, xT 0.24WhittakerMyles Peart Harris: 88 passningar, xT 0.1HarrisMaximilian Michael Arfsten: 88 passningar, xT 0.23ArfstenRiley Mcgree: 73 passningar, xT 0.51McgreeRadek Vítek: 72 passningar, xT 0.24Vítek
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Queens Park Rangers
    Jimmy Dunne: 184 passningar, xT -0.13DunnePierce Joseph Charles: 165 passningar, xT 0.25CharlesJake Clarke Salter: 156 passningar, xT 0.06SalterRonnie Edwards: 115 passningar, xT 0.44EdwardsIlias Chair: 101 passningar, xT 0.6ChairAmadou Salif Mbengue: 89 passningar, xT 0.31MbengueGlen Adjei Kamara: 87 passningar, xT 0.1KamaraHarvey Vale: 77 passningar, xT 0.5ValeTariq Kwame Nii-Lante Lamptey: 59 passningar, xT 0.61LampteyKealey Otieno Adamson: 58 passningar, xT 0.31AdamsonNicolas Madsen: 56 passningar, xT -0.01Madsen
    Middlesbrough
    Luke Ayling: 298 passningar, xT 1.09AylingAdilson Malanda: 292 passningar, xT 0.52MalandaAidan Morris: 253 passningar, xT 0.1MorrisCallum Brittain: 191 passningar, xT 0.5BrittainNeto Borges: 171 passningar, xT 0.35BorgesSebastian Matthew Berhalter: 166 passningar, xT 0.53BerhalterMorgan Whittaker: 90 passningar, xT 0.24WhittakerMyles Peart Harris: 88 passningar, xT 0.1HarrisMaximilian Michael Arfsten: 88 passningar, xT 0.23ArfstenRiley Mcgree: 73 passningar, xT 0.51McgreeRadek Vítek: 72 passningar, xT 0.24Vítek

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceQueens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
    Points107
    xPoints8.66.2
    xG per match21.9
    xGA per match0.881
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.330.3
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.050.04
    Playing styleQueens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
    Build-up efficiency0.30.34
    Field tilt0.480.67
    xT per match1.31.4
    xTA per match1.20.65
    Won balls, offensive half2426
    Pressing intensity0.240.24
    Pressing efficiency0.260.31
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.210.29
    Entries into the box per match1519
    Entries into the box against1110
    Pass completion %0.750.83
    Pass completion % under pressure0.710.79
    Passes per match334524
    Passes against per match416290
    Switches of play per match23.230.5
    Long balls per match3025
    Set piecesQueens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
    xG from free kicks0.070.22
    Corners per match4.55.8
    Corners against per match3.74.5
    xG per corner0.050.03
    xGA per corner against0.020.02
    First touch, offensive corners %0.440.65
    First touch, defensive corners %0.870.89
    OtherQueens Park RangersMiddlesbrough
    Throw-in control0.690.75
    The goalkeepersPierce Joseph Charles (Queens Park Rangers)Radek Vítek (Middlesbrough)
    Saves96
    Save %75%55%
    xG prevented86%43%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Queens Park Rangers vs Middlesbrough according to our model?

    The model gives Middlesbrough a 51% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Queens Park Rangers 25%, draw 25%, Middlesbrough 51%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 51% and under at 49%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 53% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.