01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Stoke City or draw (1X)71%
- Under 3.5 goals78%
EFL Championshipbet365 Stadium, Stoke-on-Trent15°15 km/h
Läs på svenskaSofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
TEXT: Charlton Athletic's current momentum is undeniable, coming off the back of three straight wins and having found the net in ten consecutive league matches. Meanwhile, Stoke City are in a dire slump, suffering seven consecutive losses. The model gives the hosts a slight edge with a 42% win probability, but the numbers paint a bleaker picture for them. Their xG per match is just 0.72, starkly lower than Charlton’s 1.1, suggesting they struggle to create quality scoring chances.
Despite Stoke's possession-based style, their inability to capitalize on chances highlights their shortcomings. Charlton's approach, relying on counter-attacks and crosses, seems well-suited to exploit Stoke's vulnerabilities — particularly given the hosts' alarming 2.0 xGA per match. The small head-to-head sample of two matches since 2023 doesn't outweigh the current form and underlying performance metrics, which clearly favor the visitors.
The most likely scoreline leans towards a 1-1 draw (13%), with a 1-0 victory for Stoke (12%) not far behind. Considering Charlton's form and Stoke's defensive frailties, the visitors remain a live threat, though the model still favors Stoke overall.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Stoke City | X | 2 · Charlton Athletic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bet365 | 2.10 | 3.10 | EV+ 4% 3.40 |
| Betfair Exchange | 2.16 | 3.30 | EV+ 8% 3.55 |
| Betsafe | 2.12 | 3.25 | EV+ 7% 3.50 |
| Betsson | 2.12 | 3.25 | EV+ 7% 3.50 |
| Nordicbet | 2.12 | 3.25 | EV+ 7% 3.50 |
| Pinnacle | 2.11 | 3.33 | EV+ 9% 3.58 |
Odds updated 3 Sept, 05:16
Head-to-head based on Championship data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Stoke City | Charlton Athletic |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 0 | 9 |
| xPoints | 2 | 4.2 |
| xG per match | 0.72 | 1.1 |
| xGA per match | 2 | 1.5 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.09 | 0.13 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.27 | 0.2 |
| Playing style | Stoke City | Charlton Athletic |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.29 | 0.33 |
| Field tilt | 0.35 | 0.37 |
| xT per match | 1.2 | 0.66 |
| xTA per match | 0.82 | 1.4 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 27 | 23 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.22 | 0.25 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.29 | 0.27 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.27 | 0.25 |
| Entries into the box per match | 11 | 10 |
| Entries into the box against | 14 | 16 |
| Pass completion % | 0.72 | 0.71 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.67 | 0.66 |
| Passes per match | 266 | 260 |
| Passes against per match | 373 | 411 |
| Switches of play per match | 18.8 | 16.7 |
| Long balls per match | 25 | 20 |
| Set pieces | Stoke City | Charlton Athletic |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.13 | 0.11 |
| Corners per match | 2.4 | 5.3 |
| Corners against per match | 5.4 | 5 |
| xG per corner | 0 | 0.04 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.14 | 0.44 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.38 | 0.47 |
| Other | Stoke City | Charlton Athletic |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.82 | 0.81 |
| The goalkeepers | Viktor Johansson (Stoke City) | Arthur Chukwuezugo Okonkwo (Charlton Athletic) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 7 | 9 |
| Save % | 44% | 90% |
| xG prevented | 11% | 73% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Stoke City a 42% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Stoke City 42%, draw 28%, Charlton Athletic 31%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 43% and under at 57%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 49% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.