EFL ChampionshipThe Hawthorns, West Bromwich16°2,4 mm23 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    West Bromwich AlbionWest Bromwich AlbionBalanced & physical
    vs
    Queens Park RangersQueens Park RangersBalanced & physical
    The model's lean: 1 · West Bromwich Albion (37%)Soft drawBest value by the model: 2 · Queens Park Rangers @ 3.60 (+17 %)

    West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers · EFL Championship

    1 · West Bromwich Albion 37%X 30%33% Queens Park Rangers · 2

    Analysis: West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers

    Marcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work

    The tension in this Championship clash revolves around how Queens Park Rangers, playing a balanced & physical style much like West Bromwich Albion, match up against the hosts' similarly physical approach. Despite the head-to-head advantage favoring the hosts with three wins in their last four meetings, West Brom's expected goals (xG) metrics suggest they might struggle to convert possession into clear chances. This poses a tactical puzzle for a side that prefers to battle in the midfield trenches.

    Queens Park Rangers boast superior numbers in key attacking metrics, holding an xG of 1.8 per match compared to West Brom's 1.3. Their ability to generate 0.36 xG within eight seconds of regaining possession underscores their threat on quick transitions. However, the visitors must contend with the home side's physicality, which is likely to test their resilience and adaptability. The rain forecasted, with 8.9 mm expected, should temper the pace, naturally favoring a more robust style of play and possibly stifling open exchanges.

    Given the expected goals tally of 1.47 for West Brom and 1.17 for QPR, the model leans towards a tight contest. The most probable scorelines all suggest a close affair, with 1-1 emerging as the favored outcome at 13%. Over 2.5 goals is a coin flip at 49%, while both teams to score is slightly more probable at 54%. The likelihood of a draw or a narrow win aligns with these figures, implying a strategic battle rather than a goal-fest.

    From a betting perspective, the model sees value in backing West Brom at 37%, although their underperformance in xPoints (6.1) against QPR's 9.5 might raise eyebrows. However, caution is warranted given QPR's knack for capitalizing on transitional play.

    West Bromwich AlbionWest Bromwich Albion
    Form WWLDW
    League ranking xG #12xGA #15xT #20xP/match #18Points #4
    Key players
    • Aune Selland HeggebøFxG 0.47 · xT -0.01
    • Jayson MolumbyCMxG 0.02 · xT 0.03
    • Jimmy-Jay MorganLWxG 0.31 · xT 0.09
    Queens Park RangersQueens Park Rangers
    Form WDWWL
    League ranking xG #4xGA #5xT #3xP/match #1Points #2
    Key players
    • Alfie LloydFxG 0.65 · xT 0.01
    • Rumarn Kameron-Scott BurrellFxG 0.38 · xT 0.11
    • Ilias ChairLWxG 0.54 · xT 0.34

    Match prediction: West Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers

    Predicted score matrix

    Queens Park Rangers
    West Bromwich Albion
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–07.5%
    0–18.0%
    0–24.9%
    0–31.9%
    0–4+0.7%
    1
    1–010.1%
    1–112.6%
    1–27.2%
    1–32.8%
    1–4+1.1%
    2
    2–07.7%
    2–19.0%
    2–25.3%
    2–32.1%
    2–4+0.8%
    3
    3–03.8%
    3–14.4%
    3–22.6%
    3–31.0%
    3–4+0.4%
    4+
    4+–01.9%
    4+–12.3%
    4+–21.3%
    4+–30.5%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-113%
    2. 2.1-010%
    3. 3.2-19%
    4. 4.0-18%
    5. 5.2-08%
    Expected goals
    1,471,17
    Both teams to score
    54%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,6
    Under 2,551%
    @2.20EV+6%
    Over 2,549%
    @1.80

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance West Bromwich Albion or draw (1X)70%
    • Under 3.5 goals73%

    Combined probability

    51%

    Fair odds

    1.97

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance West Bromwich Albion or draw (1X)70%
    • Under 2.5 goals51%
    • Isaac Jude Price to score22%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score54%
    • Over 2.5 goals49%
    • Ilias Emilian Chair to score22%
    • James Gerard Dunne to be booked19%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 2 · Queens Park Rangers33% probability@3.60Paddy PowerEV+17%reference odds
    • Under 2.551% probability@2.20PinnacleEV+12%reference odds
    • 2 · Queens Park Rangers33% probability@3.36PinnacleEV+9%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · West Bromwich AlbionX2 · Queens Park Rangers
    Betfair Exchange2.00
    EV+ 4%
    3.45
    EV+ 1%
    3.10
    Paddy Power1.85
    EV+ 8%
    3.60
    EV+ 17%
    3.60
    Pinnacle2.10
    EV+ 7%
    3.57
    EV+ 9%
    3.36

    Odds updated 10 Sept, 05:10

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    4 matches
    West Bromwich Albion 3Draw 0Queens Park Rangers 1
    Goals: 75 (⌀ 3)

    Head-to-head based on Championship data since 2023.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    West Bromwich Albion
    Queens Park Rangers
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    West Bromwich Albion (86)
    Queens Park Rangers (74)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    West Bromwich Albion
    George Hampton Campbell: 347 passningar, xT 0.34CampbellCallum Styles: 274 passningar, xT 0.25StylesOusmane Diakite: 257 passningar, xT -0.12DiakiteNat Phillips: 237 passningar, xT 0.27PhillipsIsaac Price: 214 passningar, xT 0.91PriceJayson Molumby: 205 passningar, xT 0.05MolumbyNolan Galves: 202 passningar, xT 0.54GalvesMax Oleary: 182 passningar, xT 0.2OlearyHarry Whitwell: 88 passningar, xT 0.46WhitwellFelix Horn Myhre: 83 passningar, xT 0.05MyhreJimmy-Jay Morgan: 81 passningar, xT -0.02Morgan
    Queens Park Rangers
    Jimmy Dunne: 237 passningar, xT 0.02DunnePierce Joseph Charles: 200 passningar, xT 0.32CharlesJake Clarke Salter: 191 passningar, xT 0.1SalterRonnie Edwards: 173 passningar, xT 0.42EdwardsAmadou Salif Mbengue: 117 passningar, xT 0.31MbengueHarvey Vale: 107 passningar, xT 0.65ValeIlias Chair: 105 passningar, xT 0.75ChairGlen Adjei Kamara: 102 passningar, xT 0.18KamaraTariq Kwame Nii-Lante Lamptey: 76 passningar, xT 0.63LampteyNicolas Madsen: 73 passningar, xT -0.01MadsenKoki Saito: 71 passningar, xT 0.33Saito
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    West Bromwich Albion
    George Hampton Campbell: 347 passningar, xT 0.34CampbellCallum Styles: 274 passningar, xT 0.25StylesOusmane Diakite: 257 passningar, xT -0.12DiakiteNat Phillips: 237 passningar, xT 0.27PhillipsIsaac Price: 214 passningar, xT 0.91PriceJayson Molumby: 205 passningar, xT 0.05MolumbyNolan Galves: 202 passningar, xT 0.54GalvesMax Oleary: 182 passningar, xT 0.2OlearyHarry Whitwell: 88 passningar, xT 0.46WhitwellFelix Horn Myhre: 83 passningar, xT 0.05MyhreJimmy-Jay Morgan: 81 passningar, xT -0.02Morgan
    Queens Park Rangers
    Jimmy Dunne: 237 passningar, xT 0.02DunnePierce Joseph Charles: 200 passningar, xT 0.32CharlesJake Clarke Salter: 191 passningar, xT 0.1SalterRonnie Edwards: 173 passningar, xT 0.42EdwardsAmadou Salif Mbengue: 117 passningar, xT 0.31MbengueHarvey Vale: 107 passningar, xT 0.65ValeIlias Chair: 105 passningar, xT 0.75ChairGlen Adjei Kamara: 102 passningar, xT 0.18KamaraTariq Kwame Nii-Lante Lamptey: 76 passningar, xT 0.63LampteyNicolas Madsen: 73 passningar, xT -0.01MadsenKoki Saito: 71 passningar, xT 0.33Saito

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceWest Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
    Points1010
    xPoints6.19.5
    xG per match1.31.8
    xGA per match1.51.1
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.090.36
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.150.11
    Playing styleWest Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
    Build-up efficiency0.30.3
    Field tilt0.640.52
    xT per match0.781.3
    xTA per match11.1
    Won balls, offensive half3024
    Pressing intensity0.220.24
    Pressing efficiency0.270.26
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.230.21
    Entries into the box per match1214
    Entries into the box against1111
    Pass completion %0.820.75
    Pass completion % under pressure0.780.69
    Passes per match474344
    Passes against per match374408
    Switches of play per match25.423.2
    Long balls per match2531
    Set piecesWest Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
    xG from free kicks00.05
    Corners per match4.86
    Corners against per match5.53.6
    xG per corner0.020.03
    xGA per corner against0.010.02
    First touch, offensive corners %0.420.33
    First touch, defensive corners %0.590.83
    OtherWest Bromwich AlbionQueens Park Rangers
    Throw-in control0.830.72
    The goalkeepersMax Oleary (West Bromwich Albion)Pierce Joseph Charles (Queens Park Rangers)
    Saves1614
    Save %76%78%
    xG prevented53%63%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins West Bromwich Albion vs Queens Park Rangers according to our model?

    The model gives West Bromwich Albion a 37% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: West Bromwich Albion 37%, draw 30%, Queens Park Rangers 33%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 49% and under at 51%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 54% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.