01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Sheffield Wednesday to win49%
- Over 1.5 goals83%
EFL League OneHillsborough, Sheffield16°1,1 mm28 km/h
Läs på svenskaErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
The crucial number here is 49% — the model's probability for a Sheffield Wednesday victory. While the hosts have been on a roll with three consecutive wins, Wigan Athletic's form has been less compelling, accumulating only three points so far. The gap in expected goals per match is significant: 2.4 for Wednesday versus 1.8 for Wigan, further underlining the home side's offensive edge.
Weather conditions suggest 3.7 mm of rain, which can dampen the scoring. However, with over 2.5 goals pegged at 61%, the model already accounts for this. Both sides share a possession-oriented style, potentially leading to midfield congestion and fewer clear-cut chances. Yet, Sheffield's defensive numbers stand out, conceding an expected 1.1 goals per game compared to Wigan's 2.0, hinting at defensive frailties for the visitors.
The smart play leans towards a Sheffield Wednesday win, perhaps 1-0 or 2-1, with the low-scoring 1-0 at 7% reflecting the defensive solidity in play — a dry but sensible choice for punters looking to capitalize on form and statistical dominance.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Sheffield Wednesday | X | 2 · Wigan Athletic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pinnacle | 1.62 | EV+ 7% 4.11 | EV+ 28% 5.14 |
Odds updated 11 Sept, 16:32
Market signal
The market has moved clearly towards a Sheffield Wednesday win since 6 September — the odds have shortened from 1.85 to 1.62 (−12%).
1.85 → 1.62
3.85 → 4.11
3.82 → 5.14
Pinnacle · 16 recorded price levels · 06/09/2026 → 11/09/2026 · fixed scale 10 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Sheffield Wednesday | Wigan Athletic |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 12 | 3 |
| xPoints | 8.9 | 5.5 |
| xG per match | 2.4 | 1.8 |
| xGA per match | 1.1 | 2 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.64 | 0.37 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.24 | 0.3 |
| Playing style | Sheffield Wednesday | Wigan Athletic |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.28 | 0.31 |
| Field tilt | 0.53 | 0.61 |
| xT per match | 1.3 | 1.2 |
| xTA per match | 0.78 | 1 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 21 | 24 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.22 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.41 | 0.32 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.37 | 0.27 |
| Entries into the box per match | 13 | 13 |
| Entries into the box against | 12 | 11 |
| Pass completion % | 0.72 | 0.75 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.69 | 0.72 |
| Passes per match | 325 | 375 |
| Passes against per match | 249 | 278 |
| Switches of play per match | 18.6 | 15.9 |
| Long balls per match | 28 | 24 |
| Set pieces | Sheffield Wednesday | Wigan Athletic |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.02 | 0.06 |
| Corners per match | 6.9 | 5.8 |
| Corners against per match | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.06 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.37 | 0.34 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.59 | 0.58 |
| Other | Sheffield Wednesday | Wigan Athletic |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.7 | 0.74 |
| The goalkeepers | Joseph Patrick Lumley (Sheffield Wednesday) | Joe Whitworth (Wigan Athletic) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 14 | 8 |
| Save % | 74% | 62% |
| xG prevented | 40% | 57% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Sheffield Wednesday a 49% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Sheffield Wednesday 49%, draw 26%, Wigan Athletic 25%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 61% and under at 39%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 62% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.