01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Chesterfield or draw (1X)63%
- Under 3.5 goals72%
EFL League TwoSMH Group Stadium, Chesterfield16°1,2 mm19 km/h
Läs på svenskaMarcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
Barnet's unbeaten streak of 13 league matches underscores their formidable league form, having scored in each of their last 14 outings. Chesterfield, however, has demonstrated resilience in possession-driven play, reflected in their higher expected goals per match (1.7) compared to Barnet's 1.5. This tactical contrast — the hosts' control against the visitors' counter-attacking prowess — sets the stage for a tightly contested match.
Despite Chesterfield's slight model-backed lean (39% probability of winning), Barnet's momentum is hard to ignore, especially with their marginal advantage in league points (8 vs. Chesterfield’s 4). The expected goals suggest parity, with Chesterfield at 1.33 and Barnet at 1.36; hence, the most likely scoreline remains 1-1 (13%). The small head-to-head sample of two matches, split evenly between the sides, offers limited insight into this encounter.
From a betting perspective, value clearly lies with Barnet. Odds of 3.2 from Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet present a 9% edge, as the model rates the visitors’ chances at 34%. Given the high likelihood of both teams finding the net (55%), a scoreline of 1-1 appears most probable, with the over 2.5 goals market sitting at an even 50%. The smart play is to back Barnet at those enticing odds.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Chesterfield | X | 2 · Barnet |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bet365 | 2.30 | 3.30 | 2.88 |
| Betfair Exchange | 2.26 | EV+ 0% 3.75 | EV+ 13% 3.30 |
| Betsafe | 2.05 | 3.45 | EV+ 9% 3.20 |
| Betsson | 2.05 | 3.45 | EV+ 9% 3.20 |
| Nordicbet | 2.05 | 3.45 | EV+ 9% 3.20 |
| Pinnacle | 2.17 | 3.71 | EV+ 7% 3.14 |
Odds updated 5 Sept, 06:32
2.06 → 2.17
3.77 → 3.71
3.18 → 3.14
1.72 → 1.76
Pinnacle · 8 recorded price levels · 02/09/2026 → 05/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on League Two data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Chesterfield | Barnet |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 4 | 8 |
| xPoints | 6.3 | 6.2 |
| xG per match | 1.7 | 1.5 |
| xGA per match | 1.1 | 0.98 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.48 | 0.43 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.23 | 0.28 |
| Playing style | Chesterfield | Barnet |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.32 | 0.35 |
| Field tilt | 0.66 | 0.69 |
| xT per match | 0.74 | 0.93 |
| xTA per match | 0.75 | 0.69 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 30 | 41 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.21 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.37 | 0.48 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.38 | 0.52 |
| Entries into the box per match | 14 | 16 |
| Entries into the box against | 8 | 10 |
| Pass completion % | 0.76 | 0.55 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.73 | 0.56 |
| Passes per match | 423 | 206 |
| Passes against per match | 279 | 184 |
| Switches of play per match | 48.4 | 12 |
| Long balls per match | 51 | 24 |
| Set pieces | Chesterfield | Barnet |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.01 | 0.04 |
| Corners per match | 3.5 | 7 |
| Corners against per match | 2.2 | 4.2 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.38 | 0.43 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.67 | 0.41 |
| Other | Chesterfield | Barnet |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.81 | 0.71 |
| The goalkeepers | Ryan Thomas William Boot (Chesterfield) | Matthew Aidan Cox (Barnet) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 11 | 8 |
| Save % | 73% | 62% |
| xG prevented | 82% | 41% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Chesterfield a 39% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Chesterfield 39%, draw 27%, Barnet 34%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 50% and under at 50%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 55% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.