EFL League TwoSMH Group Stadium, Chesterfield16°1,2 mm19 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    ChesterfieldChesterfieldPossession control
    33
    BarnetBarnetCounter-attacks & crosses
    The model's lean: 1 · Chesterfield (39%)Best value by the model: 2 · Barnet @ 3.30 (+13 %)

    ChesterfieldBarnet · EFL League Two

    1 · Chesterfield 39%X 27%34% Barnet · 2

    Analysis: ChesterfieldBarnet

    Marcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work

    Barnet's unbeaten streak of 13 league matches underscores their formidable league form, having scored in each of their last 14 outings. Chesterfield, however, has demonstrated resilience in possession-driven play, reflected in their higher expected goals per match (1.7) compared to Barnet's 1.5. This tactical contrast — the hosts' control against the visitors' counter-attacking prowess — sets the stage for a tightly contested match.

    Despite Chesterfield's slight model-backed lean (39% probability of winning), Barnet's momentum is hard to ignore, especially with their marginal advantage in league points (8 vs. Chesterfield’s 4). The expected goals suggest parity, with Chesterfield at 1.33 and Barnet at 1.36; hence, the most likely scoreline remains 1-1 (13%). The small head-to-head sample of two matches, split evenly between the sides, offers limited insight into this encounter.

    From a betting perspective, value clearly lies with Barnet. Odds of 3.2 from Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet present a 9% edge, as the model rates the visitors’ chances at 34%. Given the high likelihood of both teams finding the net (55%), a scoreline of 1-1 appears most probable, with the over 2.5 goals market sitting at an even 50%. The smart play is to back Barnet at those enticing odds.

    ChesterfieldChesterfield
    Form DLWLD
    League ranking xG #4xGA #7xT #18xP/match #6Points #16
    Key players
    • Lee BonisFxG 0.60 · xT -0.12
    • Remeao Andrew HuttonRWBxG 0.00 · xT 0.35
    • Liam MandevilleCMxG 0.29 · xT -0.01
    BarnetBarnet
    Form WWWDD
    League ranking xG #8xGA #2xT #11xP/match #8Points #2
    Key players
    • Charlie James LakinFxG 0.32 · xT 0.20
    • Kabongo TshimangaFxG 0.41 · xT -0.05
    • Oisín Jack GallagherFxG 0.10 · xT 0.03
    Final score
    33
    The model missed the outcome
    Predicted probabilities: Chesterfield 39% · Draw 27% · Barnet 34%

    How the bookmaker bet builders went

    The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.

    Matchresultat - BarnetBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 9,91fair 10,27-3 %
    Miss
    Matchresultat - ChesterfieldBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 6,29fair 10,79-42 %
    Miss

    Match prediction: ChesterfieldBarnet

    Predicted score matrix

    Barnet
    Chesterfield
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–07.1%
    0–18.9%
    0–26.3%
    0–32.9%
    0–4+1.3%
    1
    1–08.6%
    1–112.6%
    1–28.4%
    1–33.8%
    1–4+1.7%
    2
    2–06.0%
    2–18.2%
    2–25.6%
    2–32.5%
    2–4+1.2%
    3
    3–02.7%
    3–13.6%
    3–22.5%
    3–31.1%
    3–4+0.5%
    4+
    4+–01.2%
    4+–11.6%
    4+–21.1%
    4+–30.5%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-113%
    2. 2.0-19%
    3. 3.1-09%
    4. 4.1-28%
    5. 5.2-18%
    Expected goals
    1,331,36
    Both teams to score
    55%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,7
    Under 2,550%
    @2.09EV+3%
    Over 2,550%
    @1.85

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Chesterfield or draw (1X)63%
    • Under 3.5 goals72%

    Combined probability

    45%

    Fair odds

    2.21

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Chesterfield or draw (1X)63%
    • Over 2.5 goals50%
    • Dilan Kumar Markanday to score19%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score55%
    • Over 2.5 goals50%
    • Scott John High to score20%
    • Ryan William Stirk to be booked22%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 2 · Barnet34% probability@3.30Betfair ExchangeEV+13%reference odds
    • 2 · Barnet34% probability@3.20BetsafeEV+9%reference odds
    • 2 · Barnet34% probability@3.20BetssonEV+9%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · ChesterfieldX2 · Barnet
    Bet3652.303.302.88
    Betfair Exchange2.26
    EV+ 0%
    3.75
    EV+ 13%
    3.30
    Betsafe2.053.45
    EV+ 9%
    3.20
    Betsson2.053.45
    EV+ 9%
    3.20
    Nordicbet2.053.45
    EV+ 9%
    3.20
    Pinnacle2.173.71
    EV+ 7%
    3.14

    Odds updated 5 Sept, 06:32

    Odds movement

    1+5 %
    47 %42 %

    2.062.17

    X-2 %
    28 %23 %

    3.773.71

    2-1 %
    32 %27 %

    3.183.14

    Over 2,5+2 %
    57 %52 %

    1.721.76

    Pinnacle · 8 recorded price levels · 02/09/2026 → 05/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    2 matches
    Chesterfield 1Draw 0Barnet 1
    Goals: 32 (⌀ 2,5)

    Head-to-head based on League Two data since 2023.

    Key facts

    • Barnet are unbeaten in their last 13 league matches.
    • Barnet have scored in 14 consecutive league matches.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Chesterfield
    Barnet
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Chesterfield (34)
    Barnet (95)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Chesterfield
    Jack Benjamin Simpson: 260 passningar, xT 0.71SimpsonKyle Mcfadzean: 233 passningar, xT 0.4McfadzeanLewis Gordon: 227 passningar, xT 0.17GordonRemeao Andrew Hutton: 195 passningar, xT 1.3HuttonRyan Stirk: 166 passningar, xT 0.19StirkGeorge McEachran: 165 passningar, xT 0.16McEachranRyan Thomas William Boot: 122 passningar, xT 0.16BootLiam Mandeville: 108 passningar, xT -0.03MandevilleDilan Markanday: 81 passningar, xT 0.23MarkandayJoshua Abdulai Koroma: 54 passningar, xT 0.27KoromaLee Bonis: 21 passningar, xT -0.06Bonis
    Barnet
    Jake Reeves: 96 passningar, xT 0.73ReevesNikola Tavares: 81 passningar, xT 0.15TavaresDaniele James Collinge: 74 passningar, xT 0.38CollingeNnamdi Ofoborh: 73 passningar, xT 0.25OfoborhAdam Nicholas Senior: 66 passningar, xT 0.33SeniorMatthew Aidan Cox: 65 passningar, xT 0.36CoxMyles Lewis George-Kenlock: 64 passningar, xT 0.28George-KenlockCharlie James Lakin: 61 passningar, xT 0.55LakinOisín Jack Gallagher: 60 passningar, xT 0.12GallagherIdris Sheka Kanu: 47 passningar, xT 0.08KanuMichael Issac Williams: 34 passningar, xT 0.17Williams
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Chesterfield
    Jack Benjamin Simpson: 260 passningar, xT 0.71SimpsonKyle Mcfadzean: 233 passningar, xT 0.4McfadzeanLewis Gordon: 227 passningar, xT 0.17GordonRemeao Andrew Hutton: 195 passningar, xT 1.3HuttonRyan Stirk: 166 passningar, xT 0.19StirkGeorge McEachran: 165 passningar, xT 0.16McEachranRyan Thomas William Boot: 122 passningar, xT 0.16BootLiam Mandeville: 108 passningar, xT -0.03MandevilleDilan Markanday: 81 passningar, xT 0.23MarkandayJoshua Abdulai Koroma: 54 passningar, xT 0.27KoromaLee Bonis: 21 passningar, xT -0.06Bonis
    Barnet
    Jake Reeves: 96 passningar, xT 0.73ReevesNikola Tavares: 81 passningar, xT 0.15TavaresDaniele James Collinge: 74 passningar, xT 0.38CollingeNnamdi Ofoborh: 73 passningar, xT 0.25OfoborhAdam Nicholas Senior: 66 passningar, xT 0.33SeniorMatthew Aidan Cox: 65 passningar, xT 0.36CoxMyles Lewis George-Kenlock: 64 passningar, xT 0.28George-KenlockCharlie James Lakin: 61 passningar, xT 0.55LakinOisín Jack Gallagher: 60 passningar, xT 0.12GallagherIdris Sheka Kanu: 47 passningar, xT 0.08KanuMichael Issac Williams: 34 passningar, xT 0.17Williams

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceChesterfieldBarnet
    Points48
    xPoints6.36.2
    xG per match1.71.5
    xGA per match1.10.98
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.480.43
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.230.28
    Playing styleChesterfieldBarnet
    Build-up efficiency0.320.35
    Field tilt0.660.69
    xT per match0.740.93
    xTA per match0.750.69
    Won balls, offensive half3041
    Pressing intensity0.210.24
    Pressing efficiency0.370.48
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.380.52
    Entries into the box per match1416
    Entries into the box against810
    Pass completion %0.760.55
    Pass completion % under pressure0.730.56
    Passes per match423206
    Passes against per match279184
    Switches of play per match48.412
    Long balls per match5124
    Set piecesChesterfieldBarnet
    xG from free kicks0.010.04
    Corners per match3.57
    Corners against per match2.24.2
    xG per corner0.040
    xGA per corner against0.010.01
    First touch, offensive corners %0.380.43
    First touch, defensive corners %0.670.41
    OtherChesterfieldBarnet
    Throw-in control0.810.71
    The goalkeepersRyan Thomas William Boot (Chesterfield)Matthew Aidan Cox (Barnet)
    Saves118
    Save %73%62%
    xG prevented82%41%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Chesterfield vs Barnet according to our model?

    The model gives Chesterfield a 39% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Chesterfield 39%, draw 27%, Barnet 34%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 50% and under at 50%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 55% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.