01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Crawley Town or draw (1X)70%
- Under 3.5 goals72%
EFL League TwoBroadfield Stadium, Crawley17°21 km/h
Läs på svenskaMarcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
Crawley Town enters this matchup as the slight favorites, with a 43% chance of victory according to the model. The hosts' style of possession control will face off against the visitors' defensive resilience and direct counter-attacking approach. Despite Crawley Town’s higher expected goals per match (1.4), they struggle defensively, conceding an average of 1.9 expected goals against per match. Cheltenham, although statistically weaker in attack, has the edge defensively with a lower xGA of 1.5.
Historically, these teams have only met twice since 2023, each winning once, which gives little weight in predicting the outcome. The most likely scoreline, a 1-1 draw, reflects the balanced nature of this contest, with Crawley Town holding a marginal edge in attack and Cheltenham Town's stable defense offering a counterbalance.
Throughout the season, Cheltenham Town has outperformed Crawley in terms of points, garnering 8 compared to Crawley's 4. However, Crawley has shown glimpses of potential, reflected in their higher expected points of 5.7, suggesting they have been somewhat unlucky. This points to a competitive encounter where no side holds a decisive advantage.
The market sees an even split for over/under 2.5 goals, with a 50% probability indicating uncertainty about an explosive or restrained affair. Both teams to score is slightly more favored at 54%, aligning with the expectation of a close contest with goals from both sides.
In terms of betting value, the standout opportunity lies in the under 0.5 goals market. Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet are offering odds of 15.0, while the model rates this outcome at a 7% likelihood, providing an 11% edge. While a goalless draw is not the most probable scenario, the high odds present an attractive risk-to-reward ratio for those willing to back a low-scoring stalemate.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Crawley Town | X | 2 · Cheltenham Town |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.25 | 3.45 | 2.85 |
| Betsson | 2.25 | 3.45 | 2.85 |
| Nordicbet | 2.25 | 3.45 | 2.85 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 5% 2.44 | 3.66 | 2.72 |
Odds updated 11 Sept, 16:38
Market signal
The market has moved clearly towards over 2.5 goals since 5 September — the odds have shortened from 1.71 to 1.66 (−3%).
2.31 → 2.44
3.43 → 3.66
2.85 → 2.72
1.71 → 1.66
Pinnacle · 11 recorded price levels · 05/09/2026 → 11/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on League Two data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Crawley Town | Cheltenham Town |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 4 | 8 |
| xPoints | 5.7 | 6.9 |
| xG per match | 1.4 | 1.1 |
| xGA per match | 1.9 | 1.5 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.26 | 0.29 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.41 | 0.16 |
| Playing style | Crawley Town | Cheltenham Town |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.32 | 0.33 |
| Field tilt | 0.54 | 0.37 |
| xT per match | 0.77 | 0.6 |
| xTA per match | 1.2 | 1 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 22 | 23 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.22 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.37 | 0.32 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.35 | 0.33 |
| Entries into the box per match | 11 | 8 |
| Entries into the box against | 14 | 15 |
| Pass completion % | 0.74 | 0.62 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.68 | 0.58 |
| Passes per match | 341 | 249 |
| Passes against per match | 227 | 346 |
| Switches of play per match | 24.8 | 15.3 |
| Long balls per match | 26 | 27 |
| Set pieces | Crawley Town | Cheltenham Town |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.05 | 0 |
| Corners per match | 3.3 | 4.2 |
| Corners against per match | 4.9 | 5.7 |
| xG per corner | 0.05 | 0.01 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.41 | 0.43 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.52 | 0.68 |
| Other | Crawley Town | Cheltenham Town |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.8 | 0.68 |
| The goalkeepers | Nicholas Jake Michalski (Crawley Town) | Wylliam Sam Stanway (Cheltenham Town) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 8 | 9 |
| Save % | 67% | 50% |
| xG prevented | 59% | 26% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Crawley Town a 43% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Crawley Town 43%, draw 27%, Cheltenham Town 30%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 50% and under at 50%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 54% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.