01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Crewe Alexandra or draw (1X)67%
- Under 3.5 goals75%
EFL League TwoGresty Road, Crewe16°17 km/h
Läs på svenskaErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
Crewe Alexandra’s recent difficulties against Walsall highlight an intriguing tension. Despite the hosts failing to win in their last four head-to-head encounters since 2023, the model still leans slightly toward Crewe. Their expected goals and defensive metrics indicate a team with a firm handle on their tactical approach, particularly in minimizing opponent opportunities.
The most likely scoreline, a 1-1 draw at 13%, underscores a narrow margin between the teams. Crewe's expected goals of 1.33 and Walsall's 1.18 suggest a closely fought match. Both teams lean into counter-attacking and crossing strategies, which may lead to a congested midfield battle. While Crewe Alexandra shows better xPoints than Walsall (5.4 vs. 5.2), the visitors’ stronger xG per match hints at their potential threat in attack.
Given the small sample size of head-to-head meetings, current form and xG metrics weigh more heavily. Walsall’s edge in xG per match at 2.5, compared to Crewe’s 1.4, could be pivotal if the visitors manage to exploit Crewe's defensive setup. Conversely, Crewe's tighter defense compared to Walsall's leaky backline (xGA 0.83 vs. 1.5) suggests they could frustrate the visitors' chances.
The over 2.5 goals probability sits at 46%, signifying a match leaning towards a lower-scoring affair. However, the 51% probability for both teams to score keeps the door ajar for a goal from each side. With the model indicating slight value on Walsall at odds of 2.95 with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet, the sharp angle might lean toward backing the visitors, especially as they seek to extend their favorable head-to-head trend.
In a match where defensive solidity and tactical nous are likely to prevail, a gritty 1-1 draw seems a fair prediction. Yet, the value bet on Walsall at 2.95 could be worth a speculative punt for those looking to capitalize on small edges.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Crewe Alexandra | X | 2 · Walsall |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.25 | 3.30 | EV+ 3% 2.95 |
| Betsson | 2.25 | 3.30 | EV+ 3% 2.95 |
| Nordicbet | 2.25 | 3.30 | EV+ 3% 2.95 |
| Pinnacle | 2.26 | 3.70 | EV+ 4% 2.98 |
Odds updated 1 Sept, 11:35
2.13 → 2.26
3.66 → 3.70
3.10 → 2.98
1.86 → 1.79
Pinnacle · 12 recorded price levels · 30/08/2026 → 01/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on League Two data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Crewe Alexandra | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 7 | 7 |
| xPoints | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| xG per match | 1.4 | 2.5 |
| xGA per match | 0.83 | 1.5 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.33 | 0.41 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.1 | 0.37 |
| Playing style | Crewe Alexandra | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.33 | 0.36 |
| Field tilt | 0.54 | 0.52 |
| xT per match | 0.96 | 1.3 |
| xTA per match | 0.68 | 1.2 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 19 | 22 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.2 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.32 | 0.4 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.22 | 0.38 |
| Entries into the box per match | 12 | 12 |
| Entries into the box against | 10 | 14 |
| Pass completion % | 0.73 | 0.7 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.7 | 0.68 |
| Passes per match | 292 | 312 |
| Passes against per match | 332 | 217 |
| Switches of play per match | 29.3 | 26.4 |
| Long balls per match | 29 | 33 |
| Set pieces | Crewe Alexandra | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| Corners per match | 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Corners against per match | 4.2 | 5.4 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0.07 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.42 | 0.48 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.46 | 0.71 |
| Other | Crewe Alexandra | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.71 | 0.71 |
| The goalkeepers | Tom Booth (Crewe Alexandra) | Jed MacAulay Ward (Walsall) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 12 | 11 |
| Save % | 100% | 85% |
| xG prevented | 100% | 51% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Crewe Alexandra a 38% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Crewe Alexandra 38%, draw 27%, Walsall 35%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 46% and under at 54%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 51% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.