EFL League TwoPriestfield Stadium, Gillingham18°1,1 mm22 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    GillinghamGillinghamLow block & direct
    vs
    Tranmere RoversTranmere RoversPossession control
    The model's lean: 1 · Gillingham (41%)

    Gillingham – Tranmere Rovers · EFL League Two

    1 · Gillingham 41%X 29%30% Tranmere Rovers · 2

    Analysis: Gillingham – Tranmere Rovers

    Anna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work

    Gillingham's clash with Tranmere Rovers tomorrow is all about contrasting styles and current form. With Gillingham leaning on a low defence and direct approach, they're set to clash against Rovers' possession-heavy style. The hosts’ strategy suggests they might try to absorb pressure and hit on the break, while the visitors could dominate the ball. Yet, it's the fine margins that will define this contest.

    Despite Tranmere's impressive unbeaten run in their last six league matches, Gillingham's head-to-head edge cannot be overlooked, even if the sample size of four matches is relatively small. Gillingham has won twice and drawn twice in those encounters. This might instill a psychological edge, but how much it influences the game remains debatable given the small number of games.

    The model suggests Gillingham holds a slight upper hand with a 41% victory probability over Tranmere's 30%. Expected goals paint a picture of a tight battle: 1.39 for the home side against 1.04 for the visitors, implying a lean towards a low-scoring affair. Most likely scorelines hover around 1-1 and 1-0, indicating a narrow margin. With a 44% chance of over 2.5 goals and a 49% probability of both teams scoring, the data leans towards a closely fought match with minimal fireworks.

    From a betting perspective, Gillingham's victory odds of 2.55 present a 4% edge according to the model's valuation. Available at Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet, this market position offers value that underscores the hosts' potential to edge the contest. For those seeking an analytical advantage, this is where the sharpest angle lies—trusting Gillingham to capitalize on their home ground in a match that might just tilt in their favor.

    GillinghamGillingham
    Form LDDDW
    League ranking xG #18xGA #16xT #13xP/match #17Points #14
    Key players
    • Ronan Aiden Connolly Shea Chapman HaleFxG 0.25 · xT -0.06
    • James Robert BrophyLWxG 0.18 · xT 0.09
    • William Neil GoodwinFxG 0.38 · xT 0.00
    Tranmere RoversTranmere Rovers
    Form WDDDW
    League ranking xG #15xGA #22xT #19xP/match #18Points #4
    Key players
    • Dylan JonesFxG 0.57 · xT 0.04
    • Zane OkoroRWxG 0.23 · xT -0.01
    • Jordan DaviesRWxG 0.25 · xT 0.03

    Match prediction: Gillingham – Tranmere Rovers

    Predicted score matrix

    Tranmere Rovers →
    Gillingham →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–09.2%
    0–18.7%
    0–24.7%
    0–31.6%
    0–4+0.5%
    1
    1–011.9%
    1–113.1%
    1–26.6%
    1–32.3%
    1–4+0.7%
    2
    2–08.6%
    2–18.9%
    2–24.6%
    2–31.6%
    2–4+0.5%
    3
    3–04.0%
    3–14.1%
    3–22.1%
    3–30.7%
    3–4+0.2%
    4+
    4+–01.9%
    4+–11.9%
    4+–21.0%
    4+–30.3%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-113%
    2. 2.1-012%
    3. 3.0-09%
    4. 4.2-19%
    5. 5.0-19%
    Expected goals
    1,39–1,04
    Both teams to score
    49%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,4
    Under 2,556%
    @1.81EV+2%
    Over 2,544%
    @2.02

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Gillingham or draw (1X)72%
    • Under 3.5 goals77%

    Combined probability

    56%

    Fair odds

    1.80

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Gillingham or draw (1X)72%
    • Under 2.5 goals56%
    • Sebastian Palmer-Houlden to score18%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score49%
    • Over 2.5 goals44%
    • Thomas Christopher Ince to score20%
    • Samuel Joseph Finley to be booked22%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 1 · Gillingham41% probability@2.55BetsafeEV+4%reference odds
    • 1 · Gillingham41% probability@2.55BetssonEV+4%reference odds
    • 1 · Gillingham41% probability@2.55NordicbetEV+4%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · GillinghamX2 · Tranmere Rovers
    Betsafe
    EV+ 4%
    2.55    		3.302.55
    Betsson
    EV+ 4%
    2.55    		3.302.55
    Nordicbet
    EV+ 4%
    2.55    		3.302.55
    Pinnacle
    EV+ 3%
    2.52    		3.372.78

    Odds updated 11 Sept, 14:39

    Odds movement

    1-5 %
    39 %34 %

    2.66 → 2.52

    X+2 %
    31 %26 %

    3.30 → 3.37

    2+7 %
    38 %33 %

    2.59 → 2.78

    Over 2,50 %
    49 %44 %

    2.03 → 2.02

    Pinnacle · 8 recorded price levels · 06/09/2026 → 11/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    4 matches
    Gillingham 2Draw 2Tranmere Rovers 0
    Goals: 7–3 (⌀ 2,5)

    Head-to-head based on League Two data since 2023.

    Key facts

    • Tranmere Rovers are unbeaten in their last 6 league matches.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Gillingham
    Tranmere Rovers
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Gillingham (6–6)
    Tranmere Rovers (9–5)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Gillingham
    Omar Jerome Beckles: 189 passningar, xT 0.19BecklesJames Robert Brophy: 150 passningar, xT 0.39BrophyAndy Smith: 123 passningar, xT 0.2SmithLogan Dobbs: 119 passningar, xT 0.24DobbsNicholas Scott Edward Freeman: 111 passningar, xT 1.34FreemanOliver Lennon George Wright: 82 passningar, xT 0.18WrightRobbie Mckenzie: 65 passningar, xT -0.04MckenzieRonan Aiden Connolly Shea Chapman Hale: 61 passningar, xT -0.3HaleConor McManus: 50 passningar, xT 0.33McManusHarry Waldock: 38 passningar, xT 0.23WaldockAshley Maynard-Brewer: 32 passningar, xT 0.12Maynard-Brewer
    Tranmere Rovers
    William Robert Vaulks: 198 passningar, xT 0.61VaulksJoel Toby Senior: 113 passningar, xT 0.42SeniorJacob Vaughan Slater: 93 passningar, xT 0.35SlaterTom George Sawyer Conlon: 89 passningar, xT 0.17ConlonBobby Faulkner: 86 passningar, xT 0.36FaulknerThomas Christopher Ince: 81 passningar, xT 0.1InceNathan Smith: 76 passningar, xT 0.31SmithLuke Paul McGee: 74 passningar, xT 0.19McGeeJordan Turnbull: 73 passningar, xT 0.12TurnbullSam Finley: 56 passningar, xT 0.05FinleyCharlie Whitaker: 48 passningar, xT 0.08Whitaker
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Gillingham
    Omar Jerome Beckles: 189 passningar, xT 0.19BecklesJames Robert Brophy: 150 passningar, xT 0.39BrophyAndy Smith: 123 passningar, xT 0.2SmithLogan Dobbs: 119 passningar, xT 0.24DobbsNicholas Scott Edward Freeman: 111 passningar, xT 1.34FreemanOliver Lennon George Wright: 82 passningar, xT 0.18WrightRobbie Mckenzie: 65 passningar, xT -0.04MckenzieRonan Aiden Connolly Shea Chapman Hale: 61 passningar, xT -0.3HaleConor McManus: 50 passningar, xT 0.33McManusHarry Waldock: 38 passningar, xT 0.23WaldockAshley Maynard-Brewer: 32 passningar, xT 0.12Maynard-Brewer
    Tranmere Rovers
    William Robert Vaulks: 198 passningar, xT 0.61VaulksJoel Toby Senior: 113 passningar, xT 0.42SeniorJacob Vaughan Slater: 93 passningar, xT 0.35SlaterTom George Sawyer Conlon: 89 passningar, xT 0.17ConlonBobby Faulkner: 86 passningar, xT 0.36FaulknerThomas Christopher Ince: 81 passningar, xT 0.1InceNathan Smith: 76 passningar, xT 0.31SmithLuke Paul McGee: 74 passningar, xT 0.19McGeeJordan Turnbull: 73 passningar, xT 0.12TurnbullSam Finley: 56 passningar, xT 0.05FinleyCharlie Whitaker: 48 passningar, xT 0.08Whitaker

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceGillinghamTranmere Rovers
    Points69
    xPoints6.36.1
    xG per match11.2
    xGA per match1.51.8
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.210.3
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.230.08
    Playing styleGillinghamTranmere Rovers
    Build-up efficiency0.330.34
    Field tilt0.380.4
    xT per match0.80.66
    xTA per match0.710.97
    Won balls, offensive half2729
    Pressing intensity0.240.22
    Pressing efficiency0.30.36
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.30.35
    Entries into the box per match98
    Entries into the box against1312
    Pass completion %0.650.62
    Pass completion % under pressure0.610.59
    Passes per match241231
    Passes against per match341250
    Switches of play per match15.113.7
    Long balls per match3234
    Set piecesGillinghamTranmere Rovers
    xG from free kicks0.10.06
    Corners per match43.2
    Corners against per match7.45.4
    xG per corner0.010.01
    xGA per corner against0.020.01
    First touch, offensive corners %0.40.12
    First touch, defensive corners %0.610.67
    OtherGillinghamTranmere Rovers
    Throw-in control0.670.79
    The goalkeepersOliver Lennon George Wright (Gillingham)Luke Paul McGee (Tranmere Rovers)
    Saves118
    Save %79%67%
    xG prevented81%38%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Gillingham
    Fixtures, form & tips
    Tranmere Rovers
    Fixtures, form & tips

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Gillingham vs Tranmere Rovers according to our model?

    The model gives Gillingham a 41% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Gillingham 41%, draw 29%, Tranmere Rovers 30%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 44% and under at 56%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 49% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Cheltenham TownCheltenham Town
    2–1
    Rotherham UnitedRotherham United
    1 38%X 25%2 38%
    The model missed the outcome
    GillinghamGillingham
    0–3
    WalsallWalsall
    1 34%X 27%2 40%
    The model called the outcome
    ChesterfieldChesterfield
    0–1
    Fleetwood TownFleetwood Town
    1 53%X 26%2 22%
    The model missed the outcome

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.