01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Rotherham United or draw (X2)62%
- Under 3.5 goals83%
EFL League TwoSixfields, Northampton14°0,6 mm18 km/h
Läs på svenskaErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
The model indicates a finely balanced affair between Northampton Town and Rotherham United, with both the draw and the visitors slightly favored at 34%. These odds suggest a tight, tactical battle, likely dominated by defensive set-ups, given the possession-heavy styles of both teams. The most probable scorelines of 1-1 at 14% and 1-0 at 13% emphasize the likelihood of a low-scoring match.
The expected goals figures provide further clarity: Northampton's 1.14 against Rotherham's 1.01 show a negligible difference, reinforcing the idea of a close contest. However, Rotherham's superior xG per match of 1.3 over Northampton's 0.74 points to a better attacking efficiency from the visitors, despite Northampton's slight edge in defensive metrics with a lower xGA of 0.96 versus 1.1. This gives Rotherham a hint of an advantage if they can capitalize on their superior chance creation.
The numbers lean towards under 2.5 goals at 64%, with both teams scoring just 44% of the time, underscoring the defensive control expected in this match. For those looking for value, a draw at 34% is supported by the symmetry in the probabilities, with bookies typically offering appealing odds for such outcomes, making it a sensible play in an otherwise cagey fixture.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Northampton Town | Rotherham United |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 6 | 5 |
| xPoints | 6.7 | 7.8 |
| xG per match | 0.74 | 1.3 |
| xGA per match | 0.96 | 1.1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.22 | 0.16 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.24 | 0.27 |
| Playing style | Northampton Town | Rotherham United |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.32 | 0.35 |
| Field tilt | 0.38 | 0.49 |
| xT per match | 0.49 | 0.71 |
| xTA per match | 0.75 | 0.75 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 27 | 24 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.36 | 0.36 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.32 | 0.34 |
| Entries into the box per match | 9 | 9 |
| Entries into the box against | 12 | 11 |
| Pass completion % | 0.67 | 0.65 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.63 | 0.67 |
| Passes per match | 268 | 278 |
| Passes against per match | 335 | 309 |
| Switches of play per match | 16.3 | 20.4 |
| Long balls per match | 21 | 29 |
| Set pieces | Northampton Town | Rotherham United |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| Corners per match | 5.3 | 3.5 |
| Corners against per match | 3.2 | 5.1 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.5 | 0.28 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.62 | 0.69 |
| Other | Northampton Town | Rotherham United |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.72 | 0.76 |
| The goalkeepers | Zachary Anton John Jeacock (Northampton Town) | Ted Cann (Rotherham United) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 11 | 12 |
| Save % | 79% | 63% |
| xG prevented | 54% | 39% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model sees a draw as the most likely outcome: Northampton Town 33%, draw 34%, Rotherham United 34%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 14% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 36% and under at 64%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 44% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.