EFL League TwoBoundary Park, Oldham14°6,4 mm21 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Oldham AthleticOldham AthleticLow block & direct
    vs
    ChesterfieldChesterfieldPossession control
    The model's lean: 2 · Chesterfield (40%)

    Oldham AthleticChesterfield · EFL League Two

    1 · Oldham Athletic 33%X 27%40% Chesterfield · 2

    Analysis: Oldham AthleticChesterfield

    Sofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work

    Two encounters since 2023 frame the head-to-head narrative between Oldham and Chesterfield, with the hosts unbeaten thus far. While a limited sample, Oldham's edge adds intrigue. Yet, Chesterfield's 40% model probability underscores their favored status in this matchup. Despite Oldham's slight historical advantage, the visitors' overall form and playing style might turn the tide.

    Examining recent performances, Oldham's low defensive profile contrasts sharply with Chesterfield's controlled possession game. The hosts enjoy a marginal edge in points and expected points, yet the expected goals suggest a near parity, with Chesterfield slightly ahead at 1.7 xG per match to Oldham's 1.6. Defensively, Oldham concedes fewer expected goals, providing them with a slight defensive advantage.

    The expected weather, particularly the forecasted 17 mm of rain, could suppress scoring, aligning with the model's underwhelming 48% probability for over 2.5 goals. The most probable scorelines, 1-1 and 0-1, reflect the likely tightness of the contest. The Oldham-Chesterfield clash is poised to be a closely-fought encounter, with both teams likely to score, indicated by the 53% probability.

    In terms of betting value, Chesterfield's away win at odds of 3.25 through Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet presents a compelling opportunity. The model's 40% probability offers a significant 29% edge over the bookmakers' evaluation. With Chesterfield tipped by the model and the potential for tight margins, this odds disparity is the sharpest angle entering the match.

    Oldham AthleticOldham Athletic
    Form WLWDL
    League ranking xG #8xGA #7xT #23xP/match #4Points #10
    Key players
    • Karl Mike Fondop-TalumFxG 0.35 · xT 0.09
    • Elliott Lloyd NevittFxG 0.11 · xT 0.01
    • Favour FawunmiRWxG 0.26 · xT 0.08
    ChesterfieldChesterfield
    Form LWLDD
    League ranking xG #7xGA #15xT #11xP/match #8Points #18
    Key players
    • Lee BonisFxG 0.55 · xT 0.02
    • Liam MandevilleCMxG 0.29 · xT 0.01
    • Dilan MarkandayRWxG 0.17 · xT 0.09

    Match prediction: Oldham AthleticChesterfield

    Predicted score matrix

    Chesterfield
    Oldham Athletic
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–07.9%
    0–19.5%
    0–26.5%
    0–32.8%
    0–4+1.2%
    1
    1–09.2%
    1–113.0%
    1–28.2%
    1–33.6%
    1–4+1.6%
    2
    2–06.1%
    2–18.0%
    2–25.3%
    2–32.3%
    2–4+1.0%
    3
    3–02.6%
    3–13.4%
    3–22.2%
    3–31.0%
    3–4+0.4%
    4+
    4+–01.1%
    4+–11.4%
    4+–20.9%
    4+–30.4%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-113%
    2. 2.0-19%
    3. 3.1-09%
    4. 4.1-28%
    5. 5.2-18%
    Expected goals
    1,281,31
    Both teams to score
    53%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,6
    Under 2,552%
    @1.92EV+0%
    Over 2,548%
    @1.90

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Chesterfield or draw (X2)64%
    • Under 3.5 goals74%

    Combined probability

    48%

    Fair odds

    2.09

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Chesterfield or draw (X2)64%
    • Under 2.5 goals52%
    • Ruel Dimitrios Sotiriou to score27%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score53%
    • Over 2.5 goals48%
    • Ruel Dimitrios Sotiriou to score27%
    • Ryan William Stirk to be booked23%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 2 · Chesterfield40% probability@3.33PinnacleEV+32%reference odds
    • 2 · Chesterfield40% probability@3.15BetsafeEV+25%reference odds
    • 2 · Chesterfield40% probability@3.15BetssonEV+25%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Oldham AthleticX2 · Chesterfield
    Betsafe2.153.30
    EV+ 25%
    3.15
    Betsson2.153.30
    EV+ 25%
    3.15
    Nordicbet2.153.30
    EV+ 25%
    3.15
    Pinnacle2.183.39
    EV+ 32%
    3.33

    Odds updated 11 Sept, 14:39

    Odds movement

    Market signal

    The market has moved clearly towards a Oldham Athletic win since 6 September — the odds have shortened from 2.40 to 2.18 (−9%).

    1-9 %
    44 %39 %

    2.402.18

    X+3 %
    31 %26 %

    3.293.39

    2+14 %
    33 %28 %

    2.923.33

    Over 2,50 %
    52 %47 %

    1.901.90

    Pinnacle · 9 recorded price levels · 06/09/2026 → 11/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    2 matches
    Oldham Athletic 1Draw 1Chesterfield 0
    Goals: 41 (⌀ 2,5)

    Head-to-head based on League Two data since 2023.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Oldham Athletic
    Chesterfield
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Oldham Athletic (75)
    Chesterfield (67)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Oldham Athletic
    Oliver Lewis Norburn: 213 passningar, xT 0.22NorburnJamie David Robson: 145 passningar, xT 0.15RobsonGus Scott-Morriss: 145 passningar, xT 0.43Scott-MorrissKeenan Appiah-Forson: 108 passningar, xT 0.2Appiah-ForsonRyan Liam Delaney: 104 passningar, xT 0.12DelaneyDonervon Daniels: 101 passningar, xT 0.08DanielsMathew Anthony Hudson: 81 passningar, xT 0.22HudsonKane Drummond: 60 passningar, xT 0.19DrummondFavour Fawunmi: 55 passningar, xT 0.27FawunmiKarl Mike Fondop-Talum: 45 passningar, xT 0.14Fondop-TalumCalum Kavanagh: 41 passningar, xT 0.17Kavanagh
    Chesterfield
    Jack Benjamin Simpson: 278 passningar, xT 0.73SimpsonLewis Gordon: 260 passningar, xT 0.22GordonKyle Mcfadzean: 233 passningar, xT 0.4McfadzeanRemeao Andrew Hutton: 232 passningar, xT 1.62HuttonGeorge McEachran: 193 passningar, xT 0.22McEachranRyan Stirk: 191 passningar, xT 0.24StirkRyan Thomas William Boot: 137 passningar, xT 0.17BootLiam Mandeville: 131 passningar, xT 0MandevilleDilan Markanday: 92 passningar, xT 0.36MarkandayJoshua Abdulai Koroma: 60 passningar, xT 0.3KoromaLouie Marsh: 31 passningar, xT 0Marsh
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Oldham Athletic
    Oliver Lewis Norburn: 213 passningar, xT 0.22NorburnJamie David Robson: 145 passningar, xT 0.15RobsonGus Scott-Morriss: 145 passningar, xT 0.43Scott-MorrissKeenan Appiah-Forson: 108 passningar, xT 0.2Appiah-ForsonRyan Liam Delaney: 104 passningar, xT 0.12DelaneyDonervon Daniels: 101 passningar, xT 0.08DanielsMathew Anthony Hudson: 81 passningar, xT 0.22HudsonKane Drummond: 60 passningar, xT 0.19DrummondFavour Fawunmi: 55 passningar, xT 0.27FawunmiKarl Mike Fondop-Talum: 45 passningar, xT 0.14Fondop-TalumCalum Kavanagh: 41 passningar, xT 0.17Kavanagh
    Chesterfield
    Jack Benjamin Simpson: 278 passningar, xT 0.73SimpsonLewis Gordon: 260 passningar, xT 0.22GordonKyle Mcfadzean: 233 passningar, xT 0.4McfadzeanRemeao Andrew Hutton: 232 passningar, xT 1.62HuttonGeorge McEachran: 193 passningar, xT 0.22McEachranRyan Stirk: 191 passningar, xT 0.24StirkRyan Thomas William Boot: 137 passningar, xT 0.17BootLiam Mandeville: 131 passningar, xT 0MandevilleDilan Markanday: 92 passningar, xT 0.36MarkandayJoshua Abdulai Koroma: 60 passningar, xT 0.3KoromaLouie Marsh: 31 passningar, xT 0Marsh

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceOldham AthleticChesterfield
    Points75
    xPoints8.57.1
    xG per match1.61.7
    xGA per match1.11.4
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.420.46
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.060.4
    Playing styleOldham AthleticChesterfield
    Build-up efficiency0.370.33
    Field tilt0.50.63
    xT per match0.490.91
    xTA per match1.10.86
    Won balls, offensive half2928
    Pressing intensity0.20.22
    Pressing efficiency0.320.39
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.270.42
    Entries into the box per match1114
    Entries into the box against1010
    Pass completion %0.640.74
    Pass completion % under pressure0.610.7
    Passes per match239391
    Passes against per match340255
    Switches of play per match18.544
    Long balls per match3549
    Set piecesOldham AthleticChesterfield
    xG from free kicks0.040.01
    Corners per match6.33.6
    Corners against per match5.53.4
    xG per corner0.030.04
    xGA per corner against0.010.02
    First touch, offensive corners %0.520.41
    First touch, defensive corners %0.590.59
    OtherOldham AthleticChesterfield
    Throw-in control0.740.83
    The goalkeepersMathew Anthony Hudson (Oldham Athletic)Ryan Thomas William Boot (Chesterfield)
    Saves1114
    Save %73%67%
    xG prevented55%74%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Oldham Athletic vs Chesterfield according to our model?

    The model gives Chesterfield a 40% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Oldham Athletic 33%, draw 27%, Chesterfield 40%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 48% and under at 52%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 53% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.