01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Chesterfield or draw (X2)64%
- Under 3.5 goals74%
EFL League TwoBoundary Park, Oldham14°6,4 mm21 km/h
Läs på svenskaSofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
Two encounters since 2023 frame the head-to-head narrative between Oldham and Chesterfield, with the hosts unbeaten thus far. While a limited sample, Oldham's edge adds intrigue. Yet, Chesterfield's 40% model probability underscores their favored status in this matchup. Despite Oldham's slight historical advantage, the visitors' overall form and playing style might turn the tide.
Examining recent performances, Oldham's low defensive profile contrasts sharply with Chesterfield's controlled possession game. The hosts enjoy a marginal edge in points and expected points, yet the expected goals suggest a near parity, with Chesterfield slightly ahead at 1.7 xG per match to Oldham's 1.6. Defensively, Oldham concedes fewer expected goals, providing them with a slight defensive advantage.
The expected weather, particularly the forecasted 17 mm of rain, could suppress scoring, aligning with the model's underwhelming 48% probability for over 2.5 goals. The most probable scorelines, 1-1 and 0-1, reflect the likely tightness of the contest. The Oldham-Chesterfield clash is poised to be a closely-fought encounter, with both teams likely to score, indicated by the 53% probability.
In terms of betting value, Chesterfield's away win at odds of 3.25 through Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet presents a compelling opportunity. The model's 40% probability offers a significant 29% edge over the bookmakers' evaluation. With Chesterfield tipped by the model and the potential for tight margins, this odds disparity is the sharpest angle entering the match.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Oldham Athletic | X | 2 · Chesterfield |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.15 | 3.30 | EV+ 25% 3.15 |
| Betsson | 2.15 | 3.30 | EV+ 25% 3.15 |
| Nordicbet | 2.15 | 3.30 | EV+ 25% 3.15 |
| Pinnacle | 2.18 | 3.39 | EV+ 32% 3.33 |
Odds updated 11 Sept, 14:39
Market signal
The market has moved clearly towards a Oldham Athletic win since 6 September — the odds have shortened from 2.40 to 2.18 (−9%).
2.40 → 2.18
3.29 → 3.39
2.92 → 3.33
1.90 → 1.90
Pinnacle · 9 recorded price levels · 06/09/2026 → 11/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on League Two data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Oldham Athletic | Chesterfield |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 7 | 5 |
| xPoints | 8.5 | 7.1 |
| xG per match | 1.6 | 1.7 |
| xGA per match | 1.1 | 1.4 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.42 | 0.46 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.06 | 0.4 |
| Playing style | Oldham Athletic | Chesterfield |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.37 | 0.33 |
| Field tilt | 0.5 | 0.63 |
| xT per match | 0.49 | 0.91 |
| xTA per match | 1.1 | 0.86 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 29 | 28 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.2 | 0.22 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.32 | 0.39 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.27 | 0.42 |
| Entries into the box per match | 11 | 14 |
| Entries into the box against | 10 | 10 |
| Pass completion % | 0.64 | 0.74 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.61 | 0.7 |
| Passes per match | 239 | 391 |
| Passes against per match | 340 | 255 |
| Switches of play per match | 18.5 | 44 |
| Long balls per match | 35 | 49 |
| Set pieces | Oldham Athletic | Chesterfield |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.04 | 0.01 |
| Corners per match | 6.3 | 3.6 |
| Corners against per match | 5.5 | 3.4 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.04 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.52 | 0.41 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.59 | 0.59 |
| Other | Oldham Athletic | Chesterfield |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.74 | 0.83 |
| The goalkeepers | Mathew Anthony Hudson (Oldham Athletic) | Ryan Thomas William Boot (Chesterfield) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 11 | 14 |
| Save % | 73% | 67% |
| xG prevented | 55% | 74% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Chesterfield a 40% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Oldham Athletic 33%, draw 27%, Chesterfield 40%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 48% and under at 52%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 53% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.