EFL League TwoVale Park, Stoke-on-Trent16°1,3 mm26 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Port ValePort ValePossession control
    vs
    Exeter CityExeter CityPossession control
    The model's lean: 1 · Port Vale (49%)Best value by the model: Under 2,5 @ 1.86 (+4 %)

    Port ValeExeter City · EFL League Two

    1 · Port Vale 49%X 25%25% Exeter City · 2

    Analysis: Port ValeExeter City

    Marcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work

    Port Vale's defensive unit will be crucial as they host Exeter City, with the stats suggesting a tightly contested battle. Both teams lean on possession control, relying on careful buildup rather than rapid transitions. This strategic overlap might lead to a congested midfield, making it difficult for either side to dominate the goal-scoring charts. Intriguingly, Port Vale's expected goals against (xGA) of 1.0 is slightly better than Exeter's 1.1, which could hint at their ability to resist Exeter's attacking maneuvers.

    However, Exeter City arrives with a slight edge in various metrics: they've amassed more points (5) and boast superior underlying stats such as expected points (8.7) and xG per match (1.4). These figures suggest they have been the more consistent side in creating quality chances. Yet, Port Vale's home advantage should not be discounted. The model gives them a 49% win probability, highlighting their potential to edge out a narrow victory.

    The forecast of 15.2°C with significant rainfall—15.9 mm expected—can often play a dampening role on scoring. The model's numbers for over 2.5 goals (44%) and both teams to score (49%) reflect this consideration. The most likely outcomes, a 1-1 draw and a 1-0 home win, further reinforce the idea of a low-scoring affair.

    Given the tactical styles and weather considerations, the odds for under 2.5 goals present a calculated opportunity. Bettors can find value with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet, each offering odds of 1.82. The model rates this outcome as a 56% likelihood, providing a 2% edge. While predictions are never certainties, the data suggests a measured approach: expect a keenly fought contest with a premium on defensive organization and strategic patience.

    Port ValePort Vale
    Form LDDLL
    League ranking xG #21xGA #4xT #12xP/match #22Points #24
    Key players
    • Oliver David James LynchFxG 0.23 · xT 0.05
    • Cameron HumphreysCBxG 0.03 · xT 0.05
    • Jordan Lawrence GabrielRWBxG 0.05 · xT 0.13
    Exeter CityExeter City
    Form LWLDD
    League ranking xG #12xGA #8xT #17xP/match #2Points #16
    Key players
    • Jayden WarehamFxG 0.90 · xT 0.00
    • Reece ColeCAMxG 0.12 · xT 0.01
    • Edward George Martin JamesCBxG 0.15 · xT 0.05

    Match prediction: Port ValeExeter City

    Predicted score matrix

    Exeter City
    Port Vale
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–09.0%
    0–18.8%
    0–24.8%
    0–31.7%
    0–4+0.6%
    1
    1–011.7%
    1–113.1%
    1–26.7%
    1–32.4%
    1–4+0.8%
    2
    2–08.4%
    2–18.8%
    2–24.7%
    2–31.6%
    2–4+0.5%
    3
    3–03.9%
    3–14.1%
    3–22.2%
    3–30.8%
    3–4+0.3%
    4+
    4+–01.8%
    4+–11.9%
    4+–21.0%
    4+–30.4%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-113%
    2. 2.1-012%
    3. 3.0-09%
    4. 4.2-19%
    5. 5.0-19%
    Expected goals
    1,391,05
    Both teams to score
    49%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,4
    Under 2,556%
    @1.86EV+2%
    Over 2,544%
    @1.98

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Port Vale to win49%
    • Under 3.5 goals77%

    Combined probability

    33%

    Fair odds

    3.05

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Port Vale to win49%
    • Under 2.5 goals56%
    • Oliver David James Lynch to score28%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score49%
    • Over 2.5 goals44%
    • Oliver David James Lynch to score28%
    • Edward George Martin James to be booked22%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • Under 2.556% probability@1.86PinnacleEV+4%reference odds
    • Under 2.556% probability@1.82BetsafeEV+2%reference odds
    • Under 2.556% probability@1.82BetssonEV+2%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Port ValeX2 · Exeter City
    Betsafe1.983.303.70
    Betsson1.983.303.70
    Nordicbet1.983.303.70
    Pinnacle
    EV+ 0%
    2.03
    3.563.60

    Odds updated 11 Sept, 16:32

    Odds movement

    1+3 %
    49 %44 %

    1.982.03

    X-1 %
    29 %24 %

    3.613.56

    2+2 %
    29 %24 %

    3.523.60

    Over 2,5+1 %
    49 %44 %

    1.961.98

    Pinnacle · 10 recorded price levels · 06/09/2026 → 11/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Port Vale
    Exeter City
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Port Vale (27)
    Exeter City (44)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Port Vale
    Cameron Humphreys: 165 passningar, xT 0.18HumphreysJordan Lawrence Gabriel: 152 passningar, xT 0.62GabrielKyle Michael Dempsey: 141 passningar, xT 0.32DempseyLiam Spencer Gordon: 135 passningar, xT 0.38GordonConnor Hall: 131 passningar, xT 0.5HallJackson William Smith: 113 passningar, xT 0.22SmithLewis Lee Montsma: 77 passningar, xT 0.19MontsmaRhys Walters: 64 passningar, xT -0.09WaltersOnel Lázaro Hernández Mayea: 56 passningar, xT 0.89MayeaJaheim Anthony Headley: 47 passningar, xT 0.12HeadleyBenjamin Matthew Garrity: 43 passningar, xT 0.19Garrity
    Exeter City
    Jack Joseph Fitzwater: 125 passningar, xT 0.23FitzwaterCharlie James Cummins: 119 passningar, xT 0.21CumminsEdward George Martin James: 98 passningar, xT 0.21JamesJack Thomas Bycroft: 84 passningar, xT 0.25BycroftReece Cole: 79 passningar, xT 0.02ColeLuca Woodhouse: 76 passningar, xT 0.14WoodhouseJake Billy Doyle-Hayes: 74 passningar, xT 0.21Doyle-HayesGwion Dafydd Rhys Edwards: 71 passningar, xT 0.86EdwardsLakyle Samuel: 67 passningar, xT 0.06SamuelEthan Sutherland: 55 passningar, xT 0.3SutherlandVincent Harper: 52 passningar, xT 0.09Harper
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Port Vale
    Cameron Humphreys: 165 passningar, xT 0.18HumphreysJordan Lawrence Gabriel: 152 passningar, xT 0.62GabrielKyle Michael Dempsey: 141 passningar, xT 0.32DempseyLiam Spencer Gordon: 135 passningar, xT 0.38GordonConnor Hall: 131 passningar, xT 0.5HallJackson William Smith: 113 passningar, xT 0.22SmithLewis Lee Montsma: 77 passningar, xT 0.19MontsmaRhys Walters: 64 passningar, xT -0.09WaltersOnel Lázaro Hernández Mayea: 56 passningar, xT 0.89MayeaJaheim Anthony Headley: 47 passningar, xT 0.12HeadleyBenjamin Matthew Garrity: 43 passningar, xT 0.19Garrity
    Exeter City
    Jack Joseph Fitzwater: 125 passningar, xT 0.23FitzwaterCharlie James Cummins: 119 passningar, xT 0.21CumminsEdward George Martin James: 98 passningar, xT 0.21JamesJack Thomas Bycroft: 84 passningar, xT 0.25BycroftReece Cole: 79 passningar, xT 0.02ColeLuca Woodhouse: 76 passningar, xT 0.14WoodhouseJake Billy Doyle-Hayes: 74 passningar, xT 0.21Doyle-HayesGwion Dafydd Rhys Edwards: 71 passningar, xT 0.86EdwardsLakyle Samuel: 67 passningar, xT 0.06SamuelEthan Sutherland: 55 passningar, xT 0.3SutherlandVincent Harper: 52 passningar, xT 0.09Harper

    The teams in numbers

    PerformancePort ValeExeter City
    Points25
    xPoints5.38.7
    xG per match0.951.4
    xGA per match11.1
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.170.24
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.390.2
    Playing stylePort ValeExeter City
    Build-up efficiency0.320.31
    Field tilt0.570.36
    xT per match0.90.72
    xTA per match0.430.82
    Won balls, offensive half2831
    Pressing intensity0.220.24
    Pressing efficiency0.40.35
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.410.28
    Entries into the box per match1110
    Entries into the box against913
    Pass completion %0.640.61
    Pass completion % under pressure0.620.61
    Passes per match264209
    Passes against per match219339
    Switches of play per match18.713.7
    Long balls per match3132
    Set piecesPort ValeExeter City
    xG from free kicks0.060.09
    Corners per match4.64.5
    Corners against per match4.24.7
    xG per corner0.020.02
    xGA per corner against0.010.04
    First touch, offensive corners %0.480.45
    First touch, defensive corners %0.760.48
    OtherPort ValeExeter City
    Throw-in control0.750.7
    The goalkeepersJackson William Smith (Port Vale)Jack Thomas Bycroft (Exeter City)
    Saves1016
    Save %59%80%
    xG prevented36%61%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Port Vale vs Exeter City according to our model?

    The model gives Port Vale a 49% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Port Vale 49%, draw 25%, Exeter City 25%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 44% and under at 56%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 49% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.