01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Port Vale to win49%
- Under 3.5 goals77%
EFL League TwoVale Park, Stoke-on-Trent16°1,3 mm26 km/h
Läs på svenskaMarcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
Port Vale's defensive unit will be crucial as they host Exeter City, with the stats suggesting a tightly contested battle. Both teams lean on possession control, relying on careful buildup rather than rapid transitions. This strategic overlap might lead to a congested midfield, making it difficult for either side to dominate the goal-scoring charts. Intriguingly, Port Vale's expected goals against (xGA) of 1.0 is slightly better than Exeter's 1.1, which could hint at their ability to resist Exeter's attacking maneuvers.
However, Exeter City arrives with a slight edge in various metrics: they've amassed more points (5) and boast superior underlying stats such as expected points (8.7) and xG per match (1.4). These figures suggest they have been the more consistent side in creating quality chances. Yet, Port Vale's home advantage should not be discounted. The model gives them a 49% win probability, highlighting their potential to edge out a narrow victory.
The forecast of 15.2°C with significant rainfall—15.9 mm expected—can often play a dampening role on scoring. The model's numbers for over 2.5 goals (44%) and both teams to score (49%) reflect this consideration. The most likely outcomes, a 1-1 draw and a 1-0 home win, further reinforce the idea of a low-scoring affair.
Given the tactical styles and weather considerations, the odds for under 2.5 goals present a calculated opportunity. Bettors can find value with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet, each offering odds of 1.82. The model rates this outcome as a 56% likelihood, providing a 2% edge. While predictions are never certainties, the data suggests a measured approach: expect a keenly fought contest with a premium on defensive organization and strategic patience.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Port Vale | X | 2 · Exeter City |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.98 | 3.30 | 3.70 |
| Betsson | 1.98 | 3.30 | 3.70 |
| Nordicbet | 1.98 | 3.30 | 3.70 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 0% 2.03 | 3.56 | 3.60 |
Odds updated 11 Sept, 16:32
1.98 → 2.03
3.61 → 3.56
3.52 → 3.60
1.96 → 1.98
Pinnacle · 10 recorded price levels · 06/09/2026 → 11/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Port Vale | Exeter City |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 2 | 5 |
| xPoints | 5.3 | 8.7 |
| xG per match | 0.95 | 1.4 |
| xGA per match | 1 | 1.1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.17 | 0.24 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.39 | 0.2 |
| Playing style | Port Vale | Exeter City |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.32 | 0.31 |
| Field tilt | 0.57 | 0.36 |
| xT per match | 0.9 | 0.72 |
| xTA per match | 0.43 | 0.82 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 28 | 31 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.22 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.4 | 0.35 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.41 | 0.28 |
| Entries into the box per match | 11 | 10 |
| Entries into the box against | 9 | 13 |
| Pass completion % | 0.64 | 0.61 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.62 | 0.61 |
| Passes per match | 264 | 209 |
| Passes against per match | 219 | 339 |
| Switches of play per match | 18.7 | 13.7 |
| Long balls per match | 31 | 32 |
| Set pieces | Port Vale | Exeter City |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.06 | 0.09 |
| Corners per match | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Corners against per match | 4.2 | 4.7 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.01 | 0.04 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.48 | 0.45 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.76 | 0.48 |
| Other | Port Vale | Exeter City |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.75 | 0.7 |
| The goalkeepers | Jackson William Smith (Port Vale) | Jack Thomas Bycroft (Exeter City) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 10 | 16 |
| Save % | 59% | 80% |
| xG prevented | 36% | 61% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Port Vale a 49% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Port Vale 49%, draw 25%, Exeter City 25%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 44% and under at 56%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 49% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.