01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Salford City or draw (X2)68%
- Under 3.5 goals78%
EFL League TwoNew York Stadium, Rotherham17°0,2 mm31 km/h
Läs på svenskaAnna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
A clash of possession football is set to unfold between Rotherham United and Salford City, with both teams favoring control of the ball. However, the numbers hint at a tighter affair than this stylistic similarity might suggest. Salford, despite their slight advantage in points, are somewhat lucky to lead Rotherham, who boast stronger underlying statistics in expected points and goals. The hosts average 1.3 expected goals per match, edging out Salford's 1.0, and are marginally better in defense too, conceding an expected 1.1 goals compared to the visitors' 1.2.
The model, however, leans towards Salford City, giving them a 44% chance of victory. This is contrasted by a more muted expectation on the scoreline, with a 13% probability for a 1-1 draw standing as the most likely outcome. An intriguing tension exists between Salford City's higher win probability and their inferior xG performance, suggesting that their actual form may not hold as firmly as the stats imply. Moreover, Rotherham's capacity to control possession could play a crucial role in breaking down Salford's defenses, trying to exploit the visitors' slightly leakier backline.
Both teams' tendencies to control the game might lead to a stifled match, with possession battles overshadowing goalmouth action. The expected goals lean towards a low-scoring outcome, further supported by the under 2.5 goals chance sitting at 57%. Yet, it is the enticing value proposition on a goalless draw that stands out. Betting markets, through Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet, offer odds of 13.0 for under 0.5 goals, where the model suggests a 10% likelihood—translating to a healthy 24% edge.
Despite Salford's edge in outright win probabilities, the game is poised to be tight and tactical. With both teams adept at holding the ball yet cautious in chance creation, the under 0.5 goals bet presents itself as a sharp angle for those seeking potential value.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Rotherham United | X | 2 · Salford City |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.85 | 3.45 | EV+ 0% 2.25 |
| Betsson | 2.85 | 3.45 | EV+ 0% 2.25 |
| Nordicbet | 2.85 | 3.45 | EV+ 0% 2.25 |
| Pinnacle | 2.75 | 3.73 | EV+ 5% 2.37 |
Odds updated 11 Sept, 14:39
Market signal
The market has moved clearly towards a Rotherham United win since 6 September — the odds have shortened from 3.04 to 2.75 (−10%).
3.04 → 2.75
3.92 → 3.73
2.07 → 2.37
1.76 → 1.76
Pinnacle · 7 recorded price levels · 06/09/2026 → 11/09/2026 · fixed scale 10 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Rotherham United | Salford City |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 5 | 6 |
| xPoints | 7.8 | 5.1 |
| xG per match | 1.3 | 1 |
| xGA per match | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.16 | 0.11 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.27 | 0.48 |
| Playing style | Rotherham United | Salford City |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.35 | 0.37 |
| Field tilt | 0.49 | 0.65 |
| xT per match | 0.71 | 0.78 |
| xTA per match | 0.75 | 0.62 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 24 | 25 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.36 | 0.46 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.34 | 0.48 |
| Entries into the box per match | 9 | 15 |
| Entries into the box against | 11 | 12 |
| Pass completion % | 0.65 | 0.72 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.67 | 0.67 |
| Passes per match | 278 | 372 |
| Passes against per match | 309 | 173 |
| Switches of play per match | 20.4 | 23.8 |
| Long balls per match | 29 | 31 |
| Set pieces | Rotherham United | Salford City |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.03 | 0.13 |
| Corners per match | 3.5 | 5.8 |
| Corners against per match | 5.1 | 3.6 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.28 | 0.41 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.69 | 0.56 |
| Other | Rotherham United | Salford City |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.76 | 0.82 |
| The goalkeepers | Ted Cann (Rotherham United) | William James Norris (Salford City) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 12 | 12 |
| Save % | 63% | 67% |
| xG prevented | 39% | 36% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Salford City a 44% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Rotherham United 31%, draw 25%, Salford City 44%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 43% and under at 57%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 49% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.