EFL League TwoNew Meadow, Shrewsbury17°0,1 mm29 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Shrewsbury TownShrewsbury TownCounter-attacks & crosses
    vs
    Northampton TownNorthampton TownPossession control
    The model's lean: X (38%)

    Shrewsbury TownNorthampton Town · EFL League Two

    1 · Shrewsbury Town 37%X 38%26% Northampton Town · 2

    Analysis: Shrewsbury TownNorthampton Town

    Oscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work

    The number that jumps out here is the 38% model probability for a draw between Shrewsbury Town and Northampton Town. This suggests a rather balanced affair, with both sides struggling to gain an outright advantage. The predicted most likely scorelines, 1-0, 0-0, and 1-1, further underline a cautious game, with neither team expected to dominate offensively. In fact, the match is leaning heavily towards lower-scoring outcomes, indicated by the 32% chance for over 2.5 goals and a mere 40% probability for both teams to score.

    Shrewsbury, despite sitting three points behind Northampton in the standings, showcases a stronger expected goals (xG) metric per match at 1.2 compared to the visitors' 0.74. This might suggest an offensive edge for the home team. However, Shrewsbury's style of relying on counter-attacks and crosses could be hampered by the forecasted 9.9 mm of rain, which tends to suppress attacking fluidity and has been considered in the model's calculations.

    On the defensive side, both teams are quite similar, with Northampton having a slight edge in xGA (expected goals against) at 0.96 compared to Shrewsbury's 1.0. Northampton's possession-control style might help them navigate the adverse weather better, as maintaining possession can mitigate the unpredictability of a slick pitch.

    Current form and expected goals metrics point to a tight contest. Shrewsbury may have a slight xG edge, but Northampton's higher xG within eight seconds of winning the ball indicates their potential for breaking quickly and efficiently when opportunities arise.

    The standout betting angle here is the value on the draw, with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet offering odds at 3.1. The model gives a 38% probability for this result, translating to a 16% edge for bettors. Given the even nature of the matchup and the likelihood of a low-scoring affair, backing the draw seems the sharpest play.

    Shrewsbury TownShrewsbury Town
    Form LLWLL
    League ranking xG #14xGA #3xT #5xP/match #12Points #23
    Key players
    • Tom SangRWxG 0.00 · xT 0.24
    • George Robert Lawrence LloydLWxG 0.64 · xT -0.03
    • Luca Anthony HooleCBxG 0.03 · xT 0.11
    Northampton TownNorthampton Town
    Form DLDDW
    League ranking xG #24xGA #2xT #22xP/match #14Points #15
    Key players
    • Joseph Oliver WormleightonRWBxG 0.00 · xT 0.06
    • Lee EvansCDMxG 0.00 · xT 0.05
    • Nathaniel Opoku OnyinaFxG 0.26 · xT 0.00

    Match prediction: Shrewsbury TownNorthampton Town

    Predicted score matrix

    Northampton Town
    Shrewsbury Town
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–013.9%
    0–111.7%
    0–25.4%
    0–31.6%
    0–4+0.4%
    1
    1–014.6%
    1–113.8%
    1–26.0%
    1–31.8%
    1–4+0.5%
    2
    2–08.3%
    2–17.4%
    2–23.3%
    2–31.0%
    2–4+0.3%
    3
    3–03.1%
    3–12.7%
    3–21.2%
    3–30.4%
    3–4+0.1%
    4+
    4+–01.1%
    4+–11.0%
    4+–20.4%
    4+–30.1%
    4+–4+0.0%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-015%
    2. 2.0-014%
    3. 3.1-114%
    4. 4.0-112%
    5. 5.2-08%
    Expected goals
    1,110,89
    Both teams to score
    40%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,0
    Under 2,568%
    @1.62EV+9%
    Over 2,532%
    @2.35

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Shrewsbury Town or draw (1X)71%
    • Under 3.5 goals86%

    Combined probability

    61%

    Fair odds

    1.64

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Shrewsbury Town or draw (1X)71%
    • Under 2.5 goals68%
    • Joshua Michael Blainey Davison to score22%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score40%
    • Over 2.5 goals32%
    • Connor Lemonheigh-Evans to score26%
    • Elliott Jordan Moore to be booked21%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • X · Draw38% probability@3.21PinnacleEV+20%reference odds
    • X · Draw38% probability@3.10BetsafeEV+16%reference odds
    • X · Draw38% probability@3.10BetssonEV+16%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Shrewsbury TownX2 · Northampton Town
    Betsafe2.55
    EV+ 16%
    3.10
    2.72
    Betsson2.55
    EV+ 16%
    3.10
    2.72
    Nordicbet2.55
    EV+ 16%
    3.10
    2.72
    Pinnacle2.66
    EV+ 20%
    3.21
    2.74

    Odds updated 11 Sept, 16:32

    Odds movement

    Market signal

    The market has moved clearly towards under 2.5 goals since 6 September — the odds have shortened from 1.67 to 1.60 (−4%).

    1+3 %
    38 %33 %

    2.592.66

    X-2 %
    32 %27 %

    3.273.21

    2+2 %
    37 %32 %

    2.682.74

    Over 2,5+8 %
    44 %39 %

    2.172.35

    Pinnacle · 6 recorded price levels · 06/09/2026 → 11/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Shrewsbury Town
    Northampton Town
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Shrewsbury Town (210)
    Northampton Town (33)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Shrewsbury Town
    Luca Anthony Hoole: 131 passningar, xT 0.5HooleKevin Berkoe: 121 passningar, xT 0.79BerkoeTom Sang: 120 passningar, xT 1.09SangWilliam Sam Douglas Harry Boyle: 105 passningar, xT 0.23BoyleWill Gary: 93 passningar, xT 0.15GaryWilliam Michael Brook: 89 passningar, xT 0.19BrookArkell Nicholas Cecil Jude-Boyd: 81 passningar, xT 1.07Jude-BoydJoshua Andrew Bernard Ruffels: 73 passningar, xT 0.07RuffelsIsaac Andrew Fletcher: 58 passningar, xT 0.39FletcherSam Stubbs: 43 passningar, xT 0.1StubbsTom Anderson: 43 passningar, xT 0.2Anderson
    Northampton Town
    Elliott Jordan Moore: 178 passningar, xT 0.16MooreJonathan Neil Guthrie: 166 passningar, xT 0.49GuthrieLee Evans: 158 passningar, xT 0.16EvansTyrese Momodu Fornah: 141 passningar, xT 0.02FornahJames Ian Maxwell: 133 passningar, xT 0.27MaxwellJanoi Denzil Naieme Donacien: 101 passningar, xT 0.27DonacienZachary Anton John Jeacock: 92 passningar, xT 0.13JeacockJoseph Oliver Wormleighton: 92 passningar, xT 0.17WormleightonJoe Obrien Whitmarsh: 49 passningar, xT 0.26WhitmarshLogan Briggs: 49 passningar, xT -0.07BriggsConnor Lemonheigh-Evans: 39 passningar, xT -0.03Lemonheigh-Evans
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Shrewsbury Town
    Luca Anthony Hoole: 131 passningar, xT 0.5HooleKevin Berkoe: 121 passningar, xT 0.79BerkoeTom Sang: 120 passningar, xT 1.09SangWilliam Sam Douglas Harry Boyle: 105 passningar, xT 0.23BoyleWill Gary: 93 passningar, xT 0.15GaryWilliam Michael Brook: 89 passningar, xT 0.19BrookArkell Nicholas Cecil Jude-Boyd: 81 passningar, xT 1.07Jude-BoydJoshua Andrew Bernard Ruffels: 73 passningar, xT 0.07RuffelsIsaac Andrew Fletcher: 58 passningar, xT 0.39FletcherSam Stubbs: 43 passningar, xT 0.1StubbsTom Anderson: 43 passningar, xT 0.2Anderson
    Northampton Town
    Elliott Jordan Moore: 178 passningar, xT 0.16MooreJonathan Neil Guthrie: 166 passningar, xT 0.49GuthrieLee Evans: 158 passningar, xT 0.16EvansTyrese Momodu Fornah: 141 passningar, xT 0.02FornahJames Ian Maxwell: 133 passningar, xT 0.27MaxwellJanoi Denzil Naieme Donacien: 101 passningar, xT 0.27DonacienZachary Anton John Jeacock: 92 passningar, xT 0.13JeacockJoseph Oliver Wormleighton: 92 passningar, xT 0.17WormleightonJoe Obrien Whitmarsh: 49 passningar, xT 0.26WhitmarshLogan Briggs: 49 passningar, xT -0.07BriggsConnor Lemonheigh-Evans: 39 passningar, xT -0.03Lemonheigh-Evans

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceShrewsbury TownNorthampton Town
    Points36
    xPoints6.76.7
    xG per match1.20.74
    xGA per match10.96
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.10.22
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.170.24
    Playing styleShrewsbury TownNorthampton Town
    Build-up efficiency0.330.32
    Field tilt0.440.38
    xT per match1.10.49
    xTA per match0.760.75
    Won balls, offensive half3327
    Pressing intensity0.230.24
    Pressing efficiency0.310.36
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.260.32
    Entries into the box per match139
    Entries into the box against1112
    Pass completion %0.620.67
    Pass completion % under pressure0.580.63
    Passes per match226268
    Passes against per match320335
    Switches of play per match15.916.3
    Long balls per match2721
    Set piecesShrewsbury TownNorthampton Town
    xG from free kicks0.180.02
    Corners per match4.85.3
    Corners against per match3.83.2
    xG per corner0.020.02
    xGA per corner against0.030.01
    First touch, offensive corners %0.420.5
    First touch, defensive corners %0.630.62
    OtherShrewsbury TownNorthampton Town
    Throw-in control0.760.72
    The goalkeepersWilliam Sam Douglas Harry Boyle (Shrewsbury Town)Zachary Anton John Jeacock (Northampton Town)
    Saves611
    Save %100%79%
    xG prevented100%54%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Shrewsbury Town vs Northampton Town according to our model?

    The model sees a draw as the most likely outcome: Shrewsbury Town 37%, draw 38%, Northampton Town 26%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-0 at 15% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 32% and under at 68%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 40% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.