01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Everton to win48%
- Under 3.5 goals75%
Premier LeagueHill Dickinson Stadium, Liverpool14°3,0 mm26 km/h
Läs på svenskaErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
TEXT: Everton holds a slight advantage with a 48% chance of winning, according to the model, and it's a matchup where the hosts' physicality could test Ipswich Town's focus on possession control. The head-to-head record is limited, with just two meetings since 2022, where Everton came out unbeaten. This offers a minor psychological edge but doesn't weigh heavily against current form and expectations.
The model suggests a low-scoring affair, with Everton expected to find the net 1.43 times compared to Ipswich's 1.09. A 1-1 draw is the most likely scoreline at 13%, while Everton sneaking a 1-0 or 2-1 win also holds some probability at 11% and 9%, respectively. With an over/under 2.5 goals probability of 46%, the data aligns with a cautious game plan likely to keep the total goals under 2.5, reflecting Everton's slightly superior xG and defensive metrics.
Given Ipswich's lower xPoints and higher xGA metrics, Everton's edge in the underlying data suggests a narrow home advantage. Safe bets don't turn heads, but they keep the lights on.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Everton | X | 2 · Ipswich Town |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.78 | EV+ 2% 3.65 | EV+ 9% 4.55 |
| Betsson | 1.78 | EV+ 2% 3.65 | EV+ 10% 4.59 |
| Nordicbet | 1.78 | EV+ 2% 3.65 | EV+ 10% 4.60 |
| Pinnacle | 1.79 | EV+ 4% 3.72 | EV+ 4% 4.32 |
Odds updated 11 Sept, 16:14
1.82 → 1.79
3.69 → 3.72
4.23 → 4.32
1.87 → 1.86
Pinnacle · 2 recorded price levels · 11/09/2026 → 11/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Premier League data since 2022.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Everton | Ipswich Town |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 5 | 3 |
| xPoints | 4.6 | 3.7 |
| xG per match | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| xGA per match | 1.7 | 1.8 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.3 | 0.24 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.2 | 0.21 |
| Playing style | Everton | Ipswich Town |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.31 | 0.29 |
| Field tilt | 0.51 | 0.32 |
| xT per match | 0.71 | 0.87 |
| xTA per match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 28 | 20 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.22 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.24 | 0.21 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.22 | 0.19 |
| Entries into the box per match | 13 | 7 |
| Entries into the box against | 11 | 16 |
| Pass completion % | 0.75 | 0.76 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.71 | 0.73 |
| Passes per match | 312 | 313 |
| Passes against per match | 437 | 479 |
| Switches of play per match | 20.4 | 17.1 |
| Long balls per match | 26 | 23 |
| Set pieces | Everton | Ipswich Town |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.06 | 0 |
| Corners per match | 4.9 | 3.7 |
| Corners against per match | 4.3 | 5.4 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.13 | 0.01 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.2 | 0.18 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.62 | 0.44 |
| Other | Everton | Ipswich Town |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.61 | 0.68 |
| The goalkeepers | Jordan Pickford (Everton) | Kjell Scherpen (Ipswich Town) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 9 | 14 |
| Save % | 75% | 67% |
| xG prevented | 81% | 49% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Everton a 48% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Everton 48%, draw 28%, Ipswich Town 24%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 46% and under at 54%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 51% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.