01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Nottingham Forest or draw (1X)71%
- Under 3.5 goals75%
Premier LeagueThe City Ground, Nottingham15°12 km/h
Läs på svenskaSofia Andersson · · How the predictions work
42% — that's the chance Nottingham Forest has of claiming victory against Leeds United, according to the models. With Leeds trailing at 29% for both a win and a draw, the numbers nudge us toward a Forest triumph. Nottingham Forest's style leans towards counterattacks and crosses, a strategy that might exploit Leeds United's preference for a low defense and direct play. This tactical clash will be crucial, especially as Forest seeks to extend their scoring run to nine league matches.
Nottingham Forest have shown their prowess in finding the net consistently, but their head-to-head record against Leeds since 2022 offers little insight, given the small sample of just two matches split evenly with a win apiece. Undoubtedly, broader metrics tip the balance slightly toward Leeds United. They hold a marginal lead in points and expected metrics, suggesting a tighter contest than the model's prediction might imply.
1-1 emerges as the most probable scoreline, reflecting a game that could see both sides finding the net. With expected goals sitting at 1.43 for Nottingham Forest and 1.11 for Leeds, a narrow victory or a draw seems plausible. The model suggests over 2.5 goals has a mere 47% chance, and both teams to score sees a slender edge at 51%, indicating a match that might not explode into a goal fest.
Leeds United, while perhaps edging on paper, might find the away fixture challenging, especially against a Forest side eager to capitalize on its counter-attacking opportunities. However, with rain and strong wind forecasted, scoring might be hampered, leaning toward a lower-scoring affair. Here, the sharpest betting angle lies. Value seekers should note the under 2.5 goals market offers a slight edge with odds at 1.9 available with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet, presenting a 1% edge based on the model's 53% rating. It's a subtle nod to those who relish finding the right numbers in the noise.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Nottingham Forest | X | 2 · Leeds United |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.30 | 3.35 | 3.05 |
| Betsson | 2.31 | 3.37 | 3.09 |
| Nordicbet | 2.32 | 3.35 | 3.10 |
Odds updated 18 Aug, 06:36
2.36 → 2.31
3.34 → 3.37
3.05 → 3.09
1.92 → 1.91
Betsson · 2 recorded price levels · 18/08/2026 → 18/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Premier League data since 2022.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Nottingham Forest | Leeds United |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 44 | 47 |
| xPoints | 51.3 | 56.8 |
| xG per match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| xGA per match | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.18 | 0.31 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.29 | 0.22 |
| Playing style | Nottingham Forest | Leeds United |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.32 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.47 | 0.4 |
| xT per match | 1 | 0.8 |
| xTA per match | 0.99 | 0.97 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 24 | 28 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.25 | 0.27 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.29 | 0.29 |
| Entries into the box per match | 12 | 11 |
| Entries into the box against | 14 | 12 |
| Pass completion % | 0.77 | 0.75 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.74 | 0.71 |
| Passes per match | 345 | 321 |
| Passes against per match | 404 | 401 |
| Switches of play per match | 21 | 19.8 |
| Long balls per match | 27 | 27 |
| Set pieces | Nottingham Forest | Leeds United |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.05 | 0.12 |
| Corners per match | 5.3 | 4.4 |
| Corners against per match | 4.8 | 5.1 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.07 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.07 | 0.08 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.37 | 0.41 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.55 | 0.63 |
| Other | Nottingham Forest | Leeds United |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.66 | 0.7 |
| The goalkeepers | Matz Sels (Nottingham Forest) | Karl Darlow (Leeds United) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 94 | 63 |
| Save % | 72% | 72% |
| xG prevented | 52% | 58% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Nottingham Forest a 42% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Nottingham Forest 42%, draw 29%, Leeds United 29%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 47% and under at 53%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 51% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.