01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Paris FC or draw (1X)64%
- Over 1.5 goals81%
Ligue 1Stade Jean-Bouin, Paris18°20 km/h
Läs på svenskaErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
TEXT: Model probabilities give Paris FC a 44% chance of winning against Strasbourg, indicating the hosts should have the upper hand. The expected goals are tightly matched, with Paris FC having a slight edge at 1.58 compared to Strasbourg's 1.49. Despite the visitors' higher points tally, Paris FC's xPoints of 4.6 surpass Strasbourg's 2.8, suggesting a gap between outcomes and underlying performances. This leans towards a home victory, where Paris FC's control could outbalance Strasbourg's defensive stance.
The limited head-to-head data offers little guidance, with only two meetings since 2022 resulting in a draw and a loss for Paris FC. More telling is the xGA per match, where the hosts allow just 0.67 goals compared to Strasbourg's 2.2. This defensive solidity could neutralize the visitors' direct play, despite Strasbourg's points advantage. A 2-1 scoreline seems plausible, with both teams finding the net in a game likely to clear 2.5 goals.
In betting terms, the over 2.5 goals market at 59% looks promising. The defensive gaps in Strasbourg's setup against Paris FC's xG efficiency could push this match over the line. A 2-1 finish aligns with this analysis.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
| Bookmaker | 1 · Paris FC | X | 2 · Strasbourg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.05 | 3.60 | 3.40 |
| Betsson | 2.05 | 3.60 | 3.40 |
| Nordicbet | 2.05 | 3.60 | 3.40 |
Odds updated 11 Sept, 16:39
2.05 → 2.05
3.60 → 3.60
3.40 → 3.40
1.66 → 1.66
Betsson · 5 recorded price levels · 11/09/2026 → 11/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Ligue 1 data since 2022.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Paris FC | Strasbourg |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 4 | 6 |
| xPoints | 4.6 | 2.8 |
| xG per match | 2 | 1.6 |
| xGA per match | 0.67 | 2.2 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.53 | 0.31 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.11 | 0.41 |
| Playing style | Paris FC | Strasbourg |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.3 | 0.29 |
| Field tilt | 0.34 | 0.41 |
| xT per match | 0.69 | 0.93 |
| xTA per match | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 22 | 19 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.23 | 0.25 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.17 | 0.22 |
| Entries into the box per match | 6 | 15 |
| Entries into the box against | 21 | 16 |
| Pass completion % | 0.86 | 0.81 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.84 | 0.79 |
| Passes per match | 580 | 370 |
| Passes against per match | 522 | 430 |
| Switches of play per match | 15.9 | 19.4 |
| Long balls per match | 25 | 24 |
| Set pieces | Paris FC | Strasbourg |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0 | 0.02 |
| Corners per match | 2 | 2.3 |
| Corners against per match | 5.1 | 6.6 |
| xG per corner | 0.05 | 0.01 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.75 | 0.43 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.4 | 0.45 |
| Other | Paris FC | Strasbourg |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.43 | 0.75 |
| The goalkeepers | Kevin Trapp (Paris FC) | Filip Jørgensen (Strasbourg) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 9 | 14 |
| Save % | 82% | 67% |
| xG prevented | 71% | 27% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Paris FC a 44% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Paris FC 44%, draw 27%, Strasbourg 29%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 59% and under at 41%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 62% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.