01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Heidenheim or draw (1X)66%
- Under 3.5 goals72%
2. BundesligaVoith-Arena, Heidenheim18°4,9 mm16 km/h
Läs på svenskaSofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
A small sample of head-to-head encounters makes it hard to draw definitive conclusions, but the numbers suggest a tight contest between Heidenheim and Dynamo Dresden. With Heidenheim given a slight nod by the model at 38% to win, the balance of probabilities paints a picture of a match that could swing either way, especially given the visitors' slight xPoints advantage at 2.7 compared to the hosts' 2.4.
Heidenheim's attacking edge is evident, boasting 1.6 xG per match over Dynamo's 1.2. Yet, their defensive frailties are equally pronounced, conceding an average xGA of 1.8, whereas Dynamo's defense is marginally tighter at 1.5. Both teams employ a possession control style, hinting at a strategic battle for dominance rather than an open, end-to-end affair. The expected goals tally is tightly matched—1.39 for the hosts and 1.28 for the visitors—emphasizing the likely equilibrium.
Despite both teams' preference for possession, Heidenheim's superior ability to generate xG within 8 seconds of winning the ball, at 0.45 compared to Dynamo's 0.09, could be a decisive factor. This suggests that if the hosts can capitalize on quick transitions, they might edge ahead. However, with 1-1 being the most likely scoreline (13%), a draw is a real possibility, reflecting the model's draw probability of 29%.
The betting angles point strongly towards the under market. While the over/under 2.5 goals is poised at 50%, value emerges in the under 2.5 market with Betsson at odds of 2.28, offering a significant 14% edge, suggesting a lower-scoring encounter. Even sharper is the under 1.5 at 4.5, with a 12% edge—ideal for those anticipating a particularly cagey meeting. Should caution prevail, under 3.5 at 1.52 with a 9% edge offers a safer play, nicely balancing risk and reward.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Heidenheim | X | 2 · Dynamo Dresden |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bet365 | 2.00 | 3.40 | EV+ 13% 3.40 |
| Betsson | 2.02 | 3.40 | EV+ 6% 3.20 |
| Pinnacle | 2.28 | EV+ 7% 3.75 | EV+ 1% 3.05 |
Odds updated 29 Aug, 10:25
2.16 → 2.28
3.73 → 3.75
3.14 → 3.05
Pinnacle · 20 recorded price levels · 21/08/2026 → 29/08/2026 · fixed scale 10 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Heidenheim | Dynamo Dresden |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 3 | 3 |
| xPoints | 2.4 | 2.7 |
| xG per match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| xGA per match | 1.8 | 1.5 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.45 | 0.09 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.22 | 0.44 |
| Playing style | Heidenheim | Dynamo Dresden |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.32 | 0.3 |
| Field tilt | 0.43 | 0.43 |
| xT per match | 0.82 | 0.9 |
| xTA per match | 0.94 | 0.84 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 25 | 17 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.22 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.35 | 0.25 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.35 | 0.22 |
| Entries into the box per match | 13 | 11 |
| Entries into the box against | 19 | 16 |
| Pass completion % | 0.73 | 0.83 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.71 | 0.77 |
| Passes per match | 329 | 482 |
| Passes against per match | 306 | 411 |
| Switches of play per match | 32.5 | 15.4 |
| Long balls per match | 45 | 25 |
| Set pieces | Heidenheim | Dynamo Dresden |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.12 | 0 |
| Corners per match | 3.5 | 6.2 |
| Corners against per match | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.29 | 0.58 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.45 | 0.3 |
| Other | Heidenheim | Dynamo Dresden |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.76 | 0.75 |
| The goalkeepers | Frank Feller (Heidenheim) | Tim Schreiber (Dynamo Dresden) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 7 | 5 |
| Save % | 50% | 63% |
| xG prevented | 35% | 58% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Heidenheim a 38% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Heidenheim 38%, draw 29%, Dynamo Dresden 33%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 50% and under at 50%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 55% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.