01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Heidenheim or draw (X2)63%
- Over 1.5 goals79%
2. BundesligaSportpark Ronhof, Fürth17°5 km/h
Läs på svenskaErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
The narrow 36% edge the model gives Heidenheim over Greuther Fürth reflects the tight nature of this matchup. Both teams have nearly identical expected goals, with Heidenheim at 1.46 and Fürth at 1.44, pointing to a balanced contest despite the visitor's slight statistical edge in possession control. The most probable scoreline is 1-1 at 12%, suggesting a closely fought encounter with both sides likely to find the net.
Heidenheim's possession-based style contrasts sharply with Fürth's counter-attacking approach. The hosts have managed to score in their last eight league matches, indicating a consistent ability to create and convert chances. However, their 4 points compared to Heidenheim's 6 in the league standings tilts the form advantage slightly towards the visitors. Despite this, Fürth's 5.1 xPoints edge over Heidenheim's 4.1 suggests they might be underperforming their expected returns.
The over 2.5 goals has a 55% probability while both teams scoring is at 59%, indicating a lean towards a higher-scoring game. The Heidenheim edge is also reflected in their superior xG within 8 seconds of ball recovery (0.43 versus 0.22). With Heidenheim's odds marginally tipped, finding value might lie in backing the visitors at bookmakers offering odds close to evens.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Greuther Fürth | X | 2 · Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betfair Exchange | 2.58 | EV+ 13% 3.85 | 2.58 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 4% 2.95 | EV+ 11% 3.80 | 2.24 |
Odds updated 4 Sept, 12:29
2.94 → 2.95
3.72 → 3.80
2.27 → 2.24
Pinnacle · 6 recorded price levels · 31/08/2026 → 04/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Greuther Fürth | Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 4 | 6 |
| xPoints | 5.1 | 4.1 |
| xG per match | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| xGA per match | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.22 | 0.43 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.18 | 0.18 |
| Playing style | Greuther Fürth | Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.32 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.32 | 0.41 |
| xT per match | 0.84 | 1.1 |
| xTA per match | 1.7 | 0.86 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 18 | 23 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.25 | 0.32 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.22 | 0.31 |
| Entries into the box per match | 10 | 15 |
| Entries into the box against | 19 | 16 |
| Pass completion % | 0.76 | 0.72 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.74 | 0.66 |
| Passes per match | 305 | 293 |
| Passes against per match | 405 | 341 |
| Switches of play per match | 25.4 | 35.2 |
| Long balls per match | 32 | 47 |
| Set pieces | Greuther Fürth | Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.04 | 0.09 |
| Corners per match | 4.2 | 4.3 |
| Corners against per match | 7.2 | 6.6 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.05 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.31 | 0.38 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.41 | 0.55 |
| Other | Greuther Fürth | Heidenheim |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.72 | 0.79 |
| The goalkeepers | Florian Pascal Hellstern (Greuther Fürth) | Frank Feller (Heidenheim) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 14 | 7 |
| Save % | 64% | 50% |
| xG prevented | 61% | 35% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Heidenheim a 36% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Greuther Fürth 35%, draw 29%, Heidenheim 36%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 55% and under at 45%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 59% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.