01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance FC Köln or draw (1X)71%
- Over 1.5 goals77%
BundesligaRheinEnergieStadion, Köln19°12 km/h
Läs på svenskaErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
A key number emerges: FC Köln have scored in 12 consecutive league matches. This suggests a level of reliability in attack, even as they face a Werder Bremen side known for its physical approach. Although the hosts have shown vulnerability with an average xGA of 2.1 per match, their offensive xG of 2.2 suggests they can create opportunities. In contrast, the visitors have a lower xG per match at 0.74, indicating potential struggles to find the net.
The head-to-head record is limited, with just two games since 2022 where Köln came out unbeaten. So, while it leans slightly in the home side's favor, it's less relevant than current form and expected goals. Probabilities suggest a narrow edge for Köln with a likely 1-1 or 1-0 outcome. However, the over 2.5 goals probability at 53% tempers any certainty of a low-scoring affair.
For those seeking value, the under 2.5 goals market stands out. With a 47% model rating against odds of 2.47 on Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet, this offers a 17% edge, making it an enticing proposition for those less swayed by the allure of a potentially goal-heavy game.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · FC Köln | X | 2 · Werder Bremen |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.10 | EV+ 6% 3.55 | EV+ 0% 3.20 |
| Betsson | 2.10 | EV+ 7% 3.60 | EV+ 0% 3.20 |
| Nordicbet | 2.10 | EV+ 6% 3.55 | EV+ 0% 3.20 |
| Pinnacle | 2.11 | EV+ 11% 3.72 | EV+ 6% 3.39 |
Odds updated 11 Sept, 16:38
2.03 → 2.11
3.72 → 3.72
3.39 → 3.39
Pinnacle · 14 recorded price levels · 04/09/2026 → 11/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Bundesliga data since 2022.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | FC Köln | Werder Bremen |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 3 | 3 |
| xPoints | 3.7 | 2.6 |
| xG per match | 2.2 | 0.74 |
| xGA per match | 2.1 | 1.7 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.26 | 0.27 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.18 | 0.32 |
| Playing style | FC Köln | Werder Bremen |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.35 | 0.3 |
| Field tilt | 0.29 | 0.26 |
| xT per match | 0.95 | 0.38 |
| xTA per match | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 17 | 25 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.27 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.25 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.15 | 0.14 |
| Entries into the box per match | 10 | 6 |
| Entries into the box against | 23 | 15 |
| Pass completion % | 0.75 | 0.75 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.76 | 0.73 |
| Passes per match | 300 | 291 |
| Passes against per match | 448 | 519 |
| Switches of play per match | 24.1 | 25.3 |
| Long balls per match | 34 | 32 |
| Set pieces | FC Köln | Werder Bremen |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0 | 0.05 |
| Corners per match | 7 | 3.5 |
| Corners against per match | 8.5 | 6.5 |
| xG per corner | 0.07 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.05 | 0.07 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.29 | 0.43 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.41 | 0.62 |
| Other | FC Köln | Werder Bremen |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.73 | 0.77 |
| The goalkeepers | Marvin Schwäbe (FC Köln) | Karl Hein (Werder Bremen) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 6 | 4 |
| Save % | 50% | 44% |
| xG prevented | 69% | 17% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives FC Köln a 39% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: FC Köln 39%, draw 30%, Werder Bremen 31%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 53% and under at 47%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 56% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.