Serie AStadio Via del Mare, Lecce23°19 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    LecceLecceLow block & direct
    vs
    MonzaMonzaLow block & direct
    The model's lean: 1 · Lecce (35%)Soft drawBest value by the model: X · Draw @ 3.14 (+3 %)

    Lecce vs Monza · Serie A

    1 · Lecce 35%X 33%33% Monza · 2

    Analysis: LecceMonza

    Erik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work

    With Lecce and Monza both profiling as low defence and direct teams, this matchup has the makings of a tight affair. The model sees a slight edge for the hosts, but the margin is razor-thin — just 35% to Monza’s 33%, with a draw almost equally likely at 33%. A key figure to note is Lecce's slightly higher point tally so far, but Monza's superior expected points and xG metrics suggest they’ve been more effective in creating chances, even if the results haven't shown it yet.

    Recent head-to-head encounters offer a small sample size, with only two matches since 2021. Lecce has a minor upper hand, registering one win and one draw. However, the visitors' better xG and xGA per match hint at a team that might be underperforming on the scoreboard but is capable of turning things around. Monza's xGA of 1.3 per match is particularly notable, potentially limiting Lecce's attacking opportunities compared to their 2.1 xGA.

    The expected goals for this matchup are nearly even at 1.14 for Lecce and 1.21 for Monza, pointing towards a low-scoring game. With a 42% chance of over 2.5 goals and a both-teams-to-score probability at 48%, the stats lean towards a grind rather than a goal-fest. The weather forecast includes modest rain, which can further dampen scoring opportunities, a factor already considered in the model's numbers.

    The most likely scoreline, 1-1, reflected in a 14% probability, aligns with this cautious analysis. Given the balance of probabilities and the defensive tendencies of both sides, betting on a draw seems the sharpest approach. At odds of 3.15 with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet, the draw offers a 3% edge over the model's valuation, standing out as the value pick in a match where excitement might take a back seat to defensive discipline.

    LecceLecce
    Form WWWLL
    League ranking xG #12xGA #19xT #14xP/match #16Points #14
    Key players
    • Santiago PierottiCMxG 0.17 · xT 0.09
    • Lassana CoulibalyCMxG 0.07 · xT 0.01
    • Tiago GabrielCBxG 0.38 · xT 0.07
    MonzaMonza
    Form LLLLD
    League ranking xG #10xGA #8xT #11xP/match #6Points #17
    Key players
    • Gustavo Miguel Pereira de Sousa VarelaFxG 0.38 · xT -0.08
    • Samuele BirindelliLWxG 0.05 · xT 0.21
    • Andrea CarboniCBxG 0.22 · xT 0.15

    Match prediction: LecceMonza

    Predicted score matrix

    Monza
    Lecce
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–09.8%
    0–111.1%
    0–27.0%
    0–32.8%
    0–4+1.1%
    1
    1–010.4%
    1–113.5%
    1–28.0%
    1–33.2%
    1–4+1.3%
    2
    2–06.2%
    2–17.5%
    2–24.6%
    2–31.8%
    2–4+0.7%
    3
    3–02.4%
    3–12.9%
    3–21.7%
    3–30.7%
    3–4+0.3%
    4+
    4+–00.9%
    4+–11.0%
    4+–20.6%
    4+–30.3%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-114%
    2. 2.0-111%
    3. 3.1-010%
    4. 4.0-010%
    5. 5.1-28%
    Expected goals
    1,141,21
    Both teams to score
    48%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,4
    Under 2,558%
    @1.66
    Over 2,542%
    @2.32

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Lecce or draw (1X)63%
    • Under 3.5 goals79%

    Combined probability

    50%

    Fair odds

    2.01

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Lecce or draw (1X)63%
    • Under 2.5 goals58%
    • Lassana Coulibaly to score17%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score48%
    • Over 2.5 goals42%
    • Lassana Coulibaly to score17%
    • Ylber Ramadani to be booked22%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • X · Draw33% probability@3.14PinnacleEV+3%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · LecceX2 · Monza
    Betsafe2.683.052.82
    Betsson2.723.002.82
    Nordicbet2.703.052.85
    Pinnacle2.74
    EV+ 3%
    3.14
    2.86

    Odds updated 11 Sept, 21:38

    Odds movement

    Market signal

    The market has moved clearly towards an Monza win since 5 September — the odds have shortened from 3.32 to 2.86 (−14%).

    1+20 %
    43 %33 %

    2.292.74

    X-1 %
    35 %25 %

    3.183.14

    2-14 %
    36 %26 %

    3.322.86

    Over 2,5+2 %
    47 %37 %

    2.282.32

    Pinnacle · 13 recorded price levels · 05/09/2026 → 11/09/2026 · fixed scale 10 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    2 matches
    Lecce 1Draw 1Monza 0
    Goals: 21 (⌀ 1,5)

    Head-to-head based on Serie A data since 2021.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Lecce
    Monza
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Lecce (25)
    Monza (48)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Lecce
    Kialonda Gaspar: 100 passningar, xT 0.06GasparDanilo Veiga: 95 passningar, xT 0.28VeigaLassana Coulibaly: 94 passningar, xT 0.01CoulibalyTiago Gabriel: 93 passningar, xT 0.11GabrielOumar Jacky Ngom: 77 passningar, xT 0.05NgomIvan Ilić: 69 passningar, xT 0.1IlićJamil Siebert: 62 passningar, xT 0.43SiebertSantiago Pierotti: 61 passningar, xT 0.2PierottiWladimiro Falcone: 53 passningar, xT 0.06FalconeYoussef Maleh: 46 passningar, xT 0.45MalehCorrie Ndaba: 38 passningar, xT 0.05Ndaba
    Monza
    Andrea Carboni: 120 passningar, xT 0.36CarboniLorenzo Lucchesi: 96 passningar, xT 0.02LucchesiEddy Kouadio: 94 passningar, xT 0.41KouadioEbenezer Akinsanmiro: 77 passningar, xT 0.22AkinsanmiroRicardo Luís Chaby Mangas: 76 passningar, xT 0.58MangasSamuele Birindelli: 75 passningar, xT 0.51BirindelliMichael Folorunsho: 64 passningar, xT 0.19FolorunshoDemba Thiam: 46 passningar, xT 0.09ThiamManga Foe-Ondoa: 44 passningar, xT 0.04Foe-OndoaMathis Mout: 41 passningar, xT 0.09MoutAndrea Colpani: 39 passningar, xT -0.02Colpani
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Lecce
    Kialonda Gaspar: 100 passningar, xT 0.06GasparDanilo Veiga: 95 passningar, xT 0.28VeigaLassana Coulibaly: 94 passningar, xT 0.01CoulibalyTiago Gabriel: 93 passningar, xT 0.11GabrielOumar Jacky Ngom: 77 passningar, xT 0.05NgomIvan Ilić: 69 passningar, xT 0.1IlićJamil Siebert: 62 passningar, xT 0.43SiebertSantiago Pierotti: 61 passningar, xT 0.2PierottiWladimiro Falcone: 53 passningar, xT 0.06FalconeYoussef Maleh: 46 passningar, xT 0.45MalehCorrie Ndaba: 38 passningar, xT 0.05Ndaba
    Monza
    Andrea Carboni: 120 passningar, xT 0.36CarboniLorenzo Lucchesi: 96 passningar, xT 0.02LucchesiEddy Kouadio: 94 passningar, xT 0.41KouadioEbenezer Akinsanmiro: 77 passningar, xT 0.22AkinsanmiroRicardo Luís Chaby Mangas: 76 passningar, xT 0.58MangasSamuele Birindelli: 75 passningar, xT 0.51BirindelliMichael Folorunsho: 64 passningar, xT 0.19FolorunshoDemba Thiam: 46 passningar, xT 0.09ThiamManga Foe-Ondoa: 44 passningar, xT 0.04Foe-OndoaMathis Mout: 41 passningar, xT 0.09MoutAndrea Colpani: 39 passningar, xT -0.02Colpani

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceLecceMonza
    Points31
    xPoints3.14.7
    xG per match1.21.5
    xGA per match2.11.3
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.40.14
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.760.2
    Playing styleLecceMonza
    Build-up efficiency0.280.29
    Field tilt0.290.55
    xT per match0.830.99
    xTA per match1.40.8
    Won balls, offensive half2020
    Pressing intensity0.260.21
    Pressing efficiency0.280.24
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.210.17
    Entries into the box per match812
    Entries into the box against1614
    Pass completion %0.720.78
    Pass completion % under pressure0.680.71
    Passes per match303333
    Passes against per match478429
    Switches of play per match17.621.2
    Long balls per match1829
    Set piecesLecceMonza
    xG from free kicks0.050.09
    Corners per match3.33.1
    Corners against per match4.34.1
    xG per corner0.110.03
    xGA per corner against0.030.04
    First touch, offensive corners %0.40.56
    First touch, defensive corners %0.620.42
    OtherLecceMonza
    Throw-in control0.560.78
    The goalkeepersWladimiro Falcone (Lecce)Lorenzo Lucchesi (Monza)
    Saves185
    Save %78%100%
    xG prevented52%100%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Lecce vs Monza according to our model?

    The model gives Lecce a 35% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Lecce 35%, draw 33%, Monza 33%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 14% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 42% and under at 58%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 48% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.