Serie ABluenergy Stadium, Udine25°10 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    UdineseUdineseBalanced & physical
    vs
    LazioLazioBalanced & physical
    The model's lean: 1 · Udinese (35%)Soft draw

    UdineseLazio · Serie A

    1 · Udinese 35%X 31%33% Lazio · 2

    Analysis: UdineseLazio

    Marcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work

    The clash between Udinese and Lazio promises a fascinating duel, with the hosts showing a slight model edge despite the visitors' recent hot streak. Lazio rides a wave of three consecutive victories, which on the surface suggests momentum. Yet, the underlying numbers tell a different story. Udinese's expected goals per match stand at 1.4, significantly higher than Lazio's 0.81, indicating that Udinese has been creating better quality chances even if recent results haven't always reflected this.

    A closer look at their head-to-head record reveals a small sample of four matches, with Udinese unbeaten against Lazio since 2021. However, this historical data is less predictive than current form and expected goals. Still, it suggests that the hosts have had the measure of their Roman visitors in recent encounters, which might give them a psychological edge.

    Both teams play a balanced and physical game, which often results in tight contests. The model slightly favors Udinese with a 35% win probability, supported by the most likely scorelines being 1-1, 1-0, and 0-1. The expected goals are almost neck and neck at 1.23 for Udinese and 1.16 for Lazio, implying a closely fought battle on the pitch. With only a 43% probability for over 2.5 goals, the match leans towards a low-scoring affair.

    For bettors, the value lies with Udinese at odds of 2.88 available across Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet, as the model rates their chances at 35%, offering a 2% edge. While not a guarantee, this indicates a slight value play on the home side, especially given their better xG metrics and unbeaten head-to-head record against Lazio in recent years. Expect a tightly-contested affair potentially decided by a solitary goal or ending in a draw.

    UdineseUdinese
    Form WLLDW
    League ranking xG #11xGA #12xT #10xP/match #8Points #8
    Key players
    • Idrissa GueyeFxG 0.45 · xT -0.08
    • Mërgim VojvodaRWxG 0.02 · xT 0.37
    • Hassane KamaraLWBxG 0.10 · xT 0.07
    LazioLazio
    Form LLWWW
    League ranking xG #17xGA #8xT #13xP/match #12Points #7
    Key players
    • Davide FrattesiCMxG 0.22 · xT 0.15
    • Mattia ZaccagniLWxG 0.15 · xT 0.16
    • Boulaye DiaFxG 0.00 · xT -0.01

    Match prediction: UdineseLazio

    Predicted score matrix

    Lazio
    Udinese
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–09.5%
    0–110.2%
    0–26.1%
    0–32.4%
    0–4+0.9%
    1
    1–010.9%
    1–113.5%
    1–27.6%
    1–32.9%
    1–4+1.1%
    2
    2–07.0%
    2–18.1%
    2–24.7%
    2–31.8%
    2–4+0.7%
    3
    3–02.9%
    3–13.3%
    3–21.9%
    3–30.7%
    3–4+0.3%
    4+
    4+–01.2%
    4+–11.3%
    4+–20.8%
    4+–30.3%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-113%
    2. 2.1-011%
    3. 3.0-110%
    4. 4.0-010%
    5. 5.2-18%
    Expected goals
    1,231,16
    Both teams to score
    49%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,4
    Under 2,557%
    @1.63
    Over 2,543%
    @2.40EV+3%

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Udinese or draw (1X)66%
    • Under 3.5 goals78%

    Combined probability

    52%

    Fair odds

    1.93

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Udinese or draw (1X)66%
    • Under 2.5 goals57%
    • Nicolò Zaniolo to score25%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score49%
    • Over 2.5 goals43%
    • Nicolò Zaniolo to score25%
    • Jesper Kewe Karlström to be booked20%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 1 · Udinese35% probability@2.93PinnacleEV+4%reference odds
    • Over 2.543% probability@2.40PinnacleEV+3%reference odds
    • 1 · Udinese35% probability@2.88BetsafeEV+2%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · UdineseX2 · Lazio
    Betsafe
    EV+ 2%
    2.88
    3.102.58
    Betsson
    EV+ 2%
    2.88
    3.152.58
    Nordicbet
    EV+ 2%
    2.88
    3.152.58
    Pinnacle
    EV+ 4%
    2.93
    3.152.65

    Odds updated 5 Sept, 20:33

    Odds movement

    1+5 %
    36 %31 %

    2.782.93

    X+2 %
    33 %28 %

    3.093.15

    2-2 %
    39 %34 %

    2.702.65

    Pinnacle · 10 recorded price levels · 30/08/2026 → 05/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    4 matches
    Udinese 1Draw 3Lazio 0
    Goals: 76 (⌀ 3,2)

    Head-to-head based on Serie A data since 2021.

    Key facts

    • Lazio come into this round on 3 straight wins.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Udinese
    Lazio
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Udinese (43)
    Lazio (20)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Udinese
    Oumar Solet: 84 passningar, xT 0.18SoletMërgim Vojvoda: 81 passningar, xT 0.68VojvodaEnzo Ebosse: 77 passningar, xT 0.22EbosseHassane Kamara: 61 passningar, xT 0.12KamaraJames Abankwah: 58 passningar, xT 0.03AbankwahJesper Karlström: 53 passningar, xT 0.01KarlströmMaduka Okoye: 53 passningar, xT 0.1OkoyeJakub Piotrowski: 52 passningar, xT 0.08PiotrowskiJurgen Ekkelenkamp: 44 passningar, xT 0.02EkkelenkampKeinan Davis: 16 passningar, xT -0.01DavisNicolò Zaniolo: 16 passningar, xT 0.27Zaniolo
    Lazio
    Nicolò Rovella: 74 passningar, xT 0.04RovellaOliver Provstgaard: 73 passningar, xT 0.17ProvstgaardRomano Benito Floriani Mussolini: 69 passningar, xT 0.07MussoliniDanilho Raimundo Doekhi: 66 passningar, xT 0.05DoekhiKenneth Taylor: 65 passningar, xT 0.07TaylorChristos Mandas: 56 passningar, xT 0.05MandasNuno Tavares: 51 passningar, xT 0.22TavaresMattia Zaccagni: 49 passningar, xT 0.21ZaccagniBoulaye Dia: 34 passningar, xT 0.02DiaMatteo Cancellieri: 27 passningar, xT 0.07CancellieriReda Belahyane: 26 passningar, xT 0.09Belahyane
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Udinese
    Oumar Solet: 84 passningar, xT 0.18SoletMërgim Vojvoda: 81 passningar, xT 0.68VojvodaEnzo Ebosse: 77 passningar, xT 0.22EbosseHassane Kamara: 61 passningar, xT 0.12KamaraJames Abankwah: 58 passningar, xT 0.03AbankwahJesper Karlström: 53 passningar, xT 0.01KarlströmMaduka Okoye: 53 passningar, xT 0.1OkoyeJakub Piotrowski: 52 passningar, xT 0.08PiotrowskiJurgen Ekkelenkamp: 44 passningar, xT 0.02EkkelenkampKeinan Davis: 16 passningar, xT -0.01DavisNicolò Zaniolo: 16 passningar, xT 0.27Zaniolo
    Lazio
    Nicolò Rovella: 74 passningar, xT 0.04RovellaOliver Provstgaard: 73 passningar, xT 0.17ProvstgaardRomano Benito Floriani Mussolini: 69 passningar, xT 0.07MussoliniDanilho Raimundo Doekhi: 66 passningar, xT 0.05DoekhiKenneth Taylor: 65 passningar, xT 0.07TaylorChristos Mandas: 56 passningar, xT 0.05MandasNuno Tavares: 51 passningar, xT 0.22TavaresMattia Zaccagni: 49 passningar, xT 0.21ZaccagniBoulaye Dia: 34 passningar, xT 0.02DiaMatteo Cancellieri: 27 passningar, xT 0.07CancellieriReda Belahyane: 26 passningar, xT 0.09Belahyane

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceUdineseLazio
    Points46
    xPoints2.82.3
    xG per match1.40.81
    xGA per match1.71.3
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.380.07
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.180.65
    Playing styleUdineseLazio
    Build-up efficiency0.280.3
    Field tilt0.440.59
    xT per match0.990.78
    xTA per match10.89
    Won balls, offensive half2419
    Pressing intensity0.230.2
    Pressing efficiency0.280.24
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.250.19
    Entries into the box per match129
    Entries into the box against1710
    Pass completion %0.750.79
    Pass completion % under pressure0.720.74
    Passes per match333332
    Passes against per match439439
    Switches of play per match1926.1
    Long balls per match3028
    Set piecesUdineseLazio
    xG from free kicks0.030
    Corners per match24.8
    Corners against per match6.54.8
    xG per corner0.040.05
    xGA per corner against0.080.04
    First touch, offensive corners %0.50.5
    First touch, defensive corners %0.540.3
    OtherUdineseLazio
    Throw-in control0.560.65
    The goalkeepersMaduka Okoye (Udinese)Christos Mandas (Lazio)
    Saves96
    Save %75%100%
    xG prevented50%100%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Udinese vs Lazio according to our model?

    The model gives Udinese a 35% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Udinese 35%, draw 31%, Lazio 33%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 43% and under at 57%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 49% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.