01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Ascoli or draw (1X)69%
- Under 3.5 goals79%
Serie BStadio Cino e Lillo Del Duca, Ascoli Piceno30°26 km/h
Läs på svenskaErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
TEXT: Three points already on the board for Ascoli contrast sharply with Carrarese's slow start. Yet, dig deeper into the numbers, and the picture isn't so clear. The 1-1 scoreline lurks as most likely at 13%, just nudging out a narrow 1-0 win for the hosts. Ascoli's expected goals of 1.26 give them a slight edge over Carrarese's 1.07, suggesting they might eke out a tight advantage. But both teams share a possession-control style, indicating a midfield battle, with few clear chances materializing.
Despite the initial results, Carrarese's xPoints (1.4) outshine Ascoli's (0.4). Carrarese's xGA of 1.2 per match also suggests a more stable defense compared to Ascoli's leaky 3.4. Although Ascoli has the early points advantage, the visitors' underlying numbers reveal a side that could frustrate their hosts, especially if they tighten up at the back.
A dull 1-1 or 1-0 outcome seems plausible, with under 2.5 goals edging closer. For those hunting value, Carrarese at 4.0 with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet offers an 18% edge on the model's 29% win probability. It's a calculated risk on a night likely short on fireworks.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Ascoli | X | 2 · Carrarese |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.95 | 3.05 | EV+ 18% 4.00 |
| Betsson | 1.95 | 3.05 | EV+ 18% 4.00 |
| Nordicbet | 1.95 | 3.05 | EV+ 18% 4.00 |
| Pinnacle | 2.00 | 3.20 | EV+ 21% 4.12 |
Odds updated 28 Aug, 06:40
1.94 → 2.00
3.24 → 3.20
4.30 → 4.12
Pinnacle · 4 recorded price levels · 24/08/2026 → 26/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Ascoli | Carrarese |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 3 | 0 |
| xPoints | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| xG per match | 1.1 | 0.73 |
| xGA per match | 3.4 | 1.2 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.58 | 0.38 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.54 | 0.57 |
| Playing style | Ascoli | Carrarese |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.14 | 0.3 |
| Field tilt | 0.4 | 0.34 |
| xT per match | 0.38 | 0.55 |
| xTA per match | 2 | 0.99 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 32 | 21 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.22 | 0.2 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.27 | 0.29 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.26 | 0.28 |
| Entries into the box per match | 11 | 7 |
| Entries into the box against | 19 | 13 |
| Pass completion % | 0.76 | 0.72 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.71 | 0.63 |
| Passes per match | 345 | 331 |
| Passes against per match | 285 | 362 |
| Switches of play per match | 13.2 | 17.7 |
| Long balls per match | 25 | 28 |
| Set pieces | Ascoli | Carrarese |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.22 | 0.01 |
| Corners per match | 3 | 2 |
| Corners against per match | 5.1 | 2.9 |
| xG per corner | 0.06 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.67 | 0.5 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.8 | 0.67 |
| Other | Ascoli | Carrarese |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.73 | 0.56 |
| The goalkeepers | Nicholas Rizzo (Ascoli) | Fabio Ruggeri (Carrarese) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 5 | 3 |
| Save % | 100% | 100% |
| xG prevented | 100% | 100% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Ascoli a 41% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Ascoli 41%, draw 30%, Carrarese 29%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 41% and under at 59%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 48% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.