01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Juve Stabia or draw (X2)64%
- Over 1.5 goals76%
Serie BStadio Romeo Menti, Vicenza21°6 km/h
Läs på svenskaErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
A razor-thin margin separates these two sides in what promises to be a tightly contested Serie B clash. With the model giving Juve Stabia a slight win probability edge at 37% over Vicenza’s 34%, the visitors carry the favored tag, albeit by the slimmest of margins. Yet, the most probable scoreline tells a different story with a 1-1 draw leading the prediction at 12%, supported by the expected goals tally (Vicenza 1.37, Juve Stabia 1.38).
Vicenza holds a slight advantage in underlying numbers, boasting 1.6 xG per match compared to Juve Stabia’s 1.0, and a better defensive posture with 1.2 xGA against 1.5. This suggests the hosts have more scoring potential and defensive solidity. However, both teams employ a counter-attacking style with a focus on crosses, making their battle likely to hinge on who can exploit these opportunities more effectively.
For those seeking value, the away win at odds of 3.9 with bookmakers like Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet offers a tempting proposition, given the model’s assessment of Juve Stabia's 37% win probability. With a 45% edge on the odds, it stands as the sharpest angle for punters looking to back the visitors in this encounter.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Vicenza | X | 2 · Juve Stabia |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.98 | 3.05 | EV+ 45% 3.90 |
| Betsson | 1.98 | 3.05 | EV+ 45% 3.90 |
| Nordicbet | 1.98 | 3.05 | EV+ 45% 3.90 |
| Pinnacle | 2.13 | 3.11 | EV+ 46% 3.93 |
Odds updated 11 Sept, 14:30
2.04 → 2.13
3.12 → 3.11
4.17 → 3.93
2.36 → 2.26
Pinnacle · 9 recorded price levels · 07/09/2026 → 11/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Vicenza | Juve Stabia |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 4 | 3 |
| xPoints | 4.5 | 2.2 |
| xG per match | 1.6 | 1 |
| xGA per match | 1.2 | 1.5 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.46 | 0.15 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.16 | 0.38 |
| Playing style | Vicenza | Juve Stabia |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.31 | 0.28 |
| Field tilt | 0.48 | 0.45 |
| xT per match | 1.1 | 0.81 |
| xTA per match | 0.89 | 0.6 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 27 | 26 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.28 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.24 | 0.32 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.23 | 0.27 |
| Entries into the box per match | 11 | 12 |
| Entries into the box against | 11 | 12 |
| Pass completion % | 0.77 | 0.79 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.75 | 0.75 |
| Passes per match | 332 | 407 |
| Passes against per match | 323 | 292 |
| Switches of play per match | 31.5 | 25.3 |
| Long balls per match | 39 | 25 |
| Set pieces | Vicenza | Juve Stabia |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.04 | 0.01 |
| Corners per match | 7 | 5.5 |
| Corners against per match | 4 | 3.6 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.07 | 0.01 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.29 | 0.59 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.58 | 0.64 |
| Other | Vicenza | Juve Stabia |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.71 | 0.71 |
| The goalkeepers | Riccardo Gagno (Vicenza) | Pietro Boer (Juve Stabia) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 12 | 13 |
| Save % | 63% | 72% |
| xG prevented | 36% | 75% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Juve Stabia a 37% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Vicenza 34%, draw 28%, Juve Stabia 37%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 52% and under at 48%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 56% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.