01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Mantova or draw (1X)65%
- Over 1.5 goals78%
Serie BStadio Danilo Martelli, Mantova20°7 km/h
Läs på svenskaSofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
Mantova's 42% win probability against Sampdoria suggests a clear tilt towards the hosts. Despite a narrow expected goals margin (1.46 vs 1.38), the home side’s head-to-head record—two wins, a draw, and a loss from four matchups—reinforces their edge. Although the sample is small, Mantova has capitalized on its possession-based style, leveraging a more resilient defense with an xGA of 0.58 compared to Sampdoria's 0.96. The hosts have also shown a knack for tight games, reflected in their marginal edge in points and expected points.
The goal model points to a slight inclination towards over 2.5 goals at 54%, but the rainy forecast of 6.9 mm could dampen the scoring potential, already factored into this percentage. Both teams are likely to find the net, with a 58% chance indicating defensive vulnerabilities on both ends. Sampdoria's high pressing might unsettle Mantova, yet the visitors have struggled to convert possession into points, highlighted by their meager tally of one point.
There's potential lean towards Mantova given their favorable home statistics and Sampdoria’s underwhelming form. A 1-1 scoreline looms over others, aligning with the model's projections as the most likely outcome.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Mantova | X | 2 · Sampdoria |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bet365 | 2.25 | 2.90 | EV+ 4% 3.40 |
| Betsafe | 2.12 | 3.00 | EV+ 8% 3.50 |
| Betsson | 2.12 | 3.00 | EV+ 8% 3.50 |
| Nordicbet | 2.12 | 3.00 | EV+ 8% 3.50 |
| Pinnacle | 2.14 | 3.29 | EV+ 8% 3.53 |
Odds updated 8 Sept, 05:16
Head-to-head based on Serie B data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Mantova | Sampdoria |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 6 | 1 |
| xPoints | 3.4 | 3.1 |
| xG per match | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| xGA per match | 0.58 | 0.96 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.46 | 0.26 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.19 | 0.19 |
| Playing style | Mantova | Sampdoria |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.27 | 0.3 |
| Field tilt | 0.6 | 0.74 |
| xT per match | 0.84 | 0.79 |
| xTA per match | 0.55 | 0.58 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 34 | 25 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.21 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.33 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.27 | 0.23 |
| Entries into the box per match | 12 | 21 |
| Entries into the box against | 6 | 9 |
| Pass completion % | 0.74 | 0.77 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.69 | 0.68 |
| Passes per match | 329 | 392 |
| Passes against per match | 334 | 329 |
| Switches of play per match | 29.3 | 30.5 |
| Long balls per match | 34 | 32 |
| Set pieces | Mantova | Sampdoria |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.27 | 0.08 |
| Corners per match | 3 | 6.9 |
| Corners against per match | 4 | 3.4 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.33 | 0.46 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.75 | 0.57 |
| Other | Mantova | Sampdoria |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.51 | 0.71 |
| The goalkeepers | Francesco Bardi (Mantova) | Peter Vindahl Jensen (Sampdoria) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 2 | 5 |
| Save % | 50% | 63% |
| xG prevented | 38% | 34% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Mantova a 42% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Mantova 42%, draw 27%, Sampdoria 31%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 54% and under at 46%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 58% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.